Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
15 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
epistemology
|
branch of philosophy concerned with concepts like knowledge and rational justification
|
|
metaphysics
|
branch of philosophy concerned with specifying the basic kinds of things that exist: does God exist? do physical objects exist?
|
|
metaphysical naturalism
|
holds that there is no supernatural phenomenon; can't use it as an explanation
|
|
axiology (value theory)
|
axioms are assumptions/premisses
|
|
argument
|
sequence of propositions of which 0 or more are premisses and one is the conclusion, in which the premisses are at least intended to support (give reason for accepting) the conclusion
|
|
deductive argument
|
if the premisses are true the conclusion must be true
|
|
validity
|
an argument is deductively valid because of the logical form it has; a deductively valid argument is one in which the conclusion must be true if the premisses are true
|
|
soundness
|
a deductive argument that is valid with true premisses
|
|
begging the question
|
an argument begs the question when you wouldn't accept the premisses unless you already believed the conclusion
|
|
logical form
|
logical form of an argument is what makes it deductively valid or deductively invalid
|
|
conditional
|
an if/then statement
If P, then Q |
|
antecedent
consequent |
if clause
then clause |
|
contrapositive
|
If not Q, then not P
equivalent to conditional |
|
converse
|
In P then Q equals if Q then P
NOT the equivalent of the conditional |
|
inductive argument
|
nondeductive argument in which characteristics of individuals not in a sample are inferred from the characteristics of individuals in a sample. The strength of an inductive inference is influenced by sample size and sample bias
|