Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
44 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Solipsism:
|
My mind is all that exists, and all that I can be sure of
|
|
Dualism (as a view about the human person):
|
The belief that each person is of two parts; a physical being and a soul. They are separate
|
|
Skepticism
|
Unsure, you don’t know anything outside anything of your own thoughts and experiences
|
|
Egocentric Predicament
|
we can’t get out of our own mind. We simply check one opinion of ours against another
|
|
Knowledge (three criteria):
|
Belief
Truth Justification |
|
Physicalism
|
The belief that there is only physical matter
|
|
Idealism:
|
Everything is idea, there’s no physical things, it’s all perception. We are all part of God’s perception, and are allowed to see only what he wants us to see
|
|
Determinism
|
Everything is pre determined and will inevitably occur. The process of decision is working out the pre determined scenario in your own mind
|
|
Hard Determinism
|
We are never free, and circumstances determine everything that we do
|
|
Soft Determinism
|
Everything is determined but we are sometimes free
|
|
Indeterminism
|
The belief that we are not predetermined, we can decide our future, it’s the notion of freedom. It is the denial of determinism
|
|
Libertarianism
|
The belief that we have libertarian freedom
|
|
Fatalism
|
What happens is unavoidable. The causes of what happens are unavoidable
|
|
Compatibilism
|
The belief that we have compatibilistic freedom
|
|
Libertarian Freedom
|
An action is free if one can do otherwise
|
|
Compatibilistic Freedom:
|
Soft determinism, if you had chosen to do so, you could have done so
|
|
Cogito ergo sum
|
I think therefore I am- Rene Decartes
|
|
Esse is percipi
|
To be is to be perceived-Bishop George Berkley
|
|
Endowment Thesis
|
Something has meaning if and only if it is endowed with (given) meaning
|
|
Logic
|
Reasoning
|
|
Argument parts:
|
Premises
Conclusion |
|
Valid:
|
“that good” logically
If all premises are true, the conclusion is true |
|
Sound:
|
If a valid argument passes the truth test it is sound
|
|
Criteria/questions for assessing arguments:
|
Is it True?
Is it Logical? |
|
Deductive:
|
If the premises are valid, the conclusion is true
|
|
Inductive arguments
|
Using premises to back up your argument
|
|
Modus Ponens:
|
If A then B
A Therefore B |
|
Modus Tollens
|
If A then B
B is not true Therefore A is not true |
|
Affirming the consequent:
|
If A then B
B is true Therefore A is true |
|
Denying the antecedent:
|
If A then B
A is not true Therefore B is not true |
|
Disjunctive Syllogism:
|
Either A or B
B is not true Therefore A is true |
|
False Cause (post hoc):
|
The conclusion is a causal claim and the reason given is a temporal claim
|
|
Hasty Generalization
|
Having too small of a sample size and making a conclusion about the population as a whole
|
|
False Dilemma (false alternatives)
|
Saying either A or B when there’s really A, B, C, and D.
|
|
Begging the Question (circular)
|
Saying the same thing, just in different ways
|
|
Slippery Slope
|
Saying A will lead to Z with no logical connections in between
|
|
Ad Hominem
|
Against the person, attacking the person, not the argument they’re making
|
|
Straw Man
|
Making up an opposing argument and tearing it down to make your argument sound better
|
|
Appeal to the Gallery:
(majority, mob) |
Saying that because a group of people agree, that the argument is good
|
|
Authority:
|
Citing an expert that has nothing to do with the topic of the argument
|
|
Red Herring (diversion)
|
Changing the subject, bringing up unrelated matters to distract from the matter at hand
|
|
Equivocation
|
Using the same word multiple times but using it in different ways (to mean different things)
|
|
Force
|
Using threats or harm to make the other person comply
|
|
Emotion
|
Appealing to emotions or feelings to persuade
|