Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
23 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
- 3rd side (hint)
Value-Theory |
The study of value as it relates to all sorts of things. |
|
|
Ethics |
The study of value as it applies directly to personal actions and decisions. |
|
|
Aesthetics |
The study of value as it pertains to art and beauty |
|
|
Logic |
Tool used by philosophers to investigate different arguments and different issues. |
|
|
The speculative conception |
To question and think |
Most popular of the 4 major schools of philosophy |
|
The analytic conception |
Understanding and decoding philosophical language |
|
|
The Existential Conception |
Focusing on human beings as concretely existing reality |
|
|
The Phenomenological conception |
Stresses that what ever is directly experienced or seen is the departure for philosophical discussion. |
Ordinary |
|
Principles of a good philosopher |
Richer fuller life |
|
|
Socrates as a good philosopher |
"The gadfly" the unexamined life is not worth living. |
|
|
The Socratic method |
Technique used to get people to think |
Critical self exam->wisdom->richer, fuller life->happiness -> better society |
|
Premise |
Evidence statements |
|
|
Conclusion |
Statement of what you want to prove |
It should begin with THEREFORE |
|
Entailment |
Connection between premise and conclusion |
|
|
Valid |
True premise and conclusion and entailment is true |
|
|
Sound |
Something makes sense |
|
|
Law of non-contradiction |
Nothing can be and not be at the same time |
|
|
Law of the excluded middle |
Something either is or is not |
|
|
Law of identity |
Something is what it is |
|
|
Deductive logic |
2 true premises and entailment is a true conclusion |
|
|
Inductive Logic |
Universal generalization analogy. Multiple premises+weak entailment = probable conclusion |
|
|
3 types of syllogism (deductive logic) |
Categorical (All, some, no), disjunctive (Either, or), Hypothetical (if, then) |
|
|
Inductive argument |
4 premises 1.Universal Generalization(1 variable) 2.Analogy(2 variables) |
|