• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/20

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

20 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
standards of justice (what must be done for someone)
pogge
negative rights - against harm
standards of justice (what must be done for someone)
WDR
noone is worse off
standards of justice (what must be done for someone)
singer, nagel, pogge
humanitarian claims, to recieve suffer poverty
standards of justice (what must be done for someone)
Rawls, WDR
w/in country equity
standards of justice (what must be done for someone)
Rawls
w/in country equality. difference maximize outcomes for the LAG
standards of justice (what must be done for someone)
C and S
Inclusion: global equity
standards of justice (what must be done for someone)
moellendorf
global equality, maximize least well off on a global scale
agents of justice definition
who responsible for meeting standard
scope definition
who entitled to be covered by standard
grounds definition
on what basis may people demand that agents meet standards that cover them
Peter Singer
if one is able to prevent bad without sacrificing comparable importance one should. addresses individuals. easy premise radical conclusion. utilitarianism - morality of action based on outcome
absolute deprivation (singer)
individual well being is specified level of goods
Nagel
humanitarian duties are cosmopolitan, negative rights. all demands of equality can only be addressed in co-citizen
nagel's pluralism
multiply standards of justice seeking equality
cosmotoliitan objection
individuals are fundamentals entitled to claims
Nagel and cooperative associations
voluntary, consent alone justifies content of voluntary agreement.
Pogge, claims
negative right not to be harm - positive right of rich to correct harms wrongfully imposed on the poor
pogge agents
all agents have negative duty not to harm others by imposing poverty on them. rich countries imposed international institutions. ex WTO
Nagel objects to Pogge
can only make claims of justice if agent of justice - no global government, no global soverign. no sovereign that enforces term.
Rawls standard of justice
basic liberties, equity, DP inequalities of wealth to arrange.