• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/13

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

13 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Why should you never critisize an argument by denying the conclusion?
truth of arguement comes from premises
to criticize- prosed reasons do not properly connect to conclusion and arguement is ill formed, reasons not worthy of acceptance
Why to never accept arugement beacuse of its conclusion
the arugement may be weak
appear to be a more reasonable, careful thinker
veiws are then more worthy of a conclusion
2 types of critisims
insubstanial criticism- all As are Bs (that may not be true) the word "might" doesnt work (arguement stoppers)

Substainable - reasons to think the premises may be incorrect - reason to suspend judgement
why accept generalization and counter examples
generlizations are straightforward and counter examples find one example to make it false
how to evalute compound sentences (2)
Conjunction - 2 or more sentences (one is false)

Disjunction - "or" statements
Correlations
compare rate at which 2 or more properties show up in 2 groups
pattern is like statisitical arguemnts
Casual Statements (4 in 2 groups)
Explicitly-use words like "cause"
Implicity-without word "cause"

Singular-specific event
General-refer to a genral statement
3 claims
factual
moral
legal
moral arguements
pattern-

the only available alternatives for S are A1, A2, ...
The harms and benefits of A are C1, C2, ...
The overall value of C is greater/lower then C2, C3, ...
Overall Value Principle (OVP)
accident or concequence
Role of testimony
based on good evidence someone has
patterns of testimony
#1
S said P and P is true
Usually when someone says something is true, then it is true

#2
S said P is true
S was sincere when saying P was true
(u)

#3
S said P is true
S was sincere in saying P was true
S is knowledgable about the subject matter P
(u)
Statisitcal Statements
x% of sample population has the measured property (reults)

if x% of the (SP) has the (MP), then x% of the (SP) has the target property (accuracy premise)
x% of the (SP) has the (TP)
is x% of the (SP) has the (TP), then x% of the target population has the (TP) (representative premise)
x% of the (T POP) has the (TP)