• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/54

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

54 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

AF defn

an irregularly, irregular supraventricular arrhythmia w atrial rates of 350-450 bpm

AF EKG

no p waves, irregular, narrow QRS

classification of AF

-first episode


-paroxysmal


-persistent


-permanent




the longer you have the disease, it progresses to permanent

paroxysmal AF

AF alternates w NSR, pt reverts spontaneously

persistent AF

AF alternates w NSR, pt requires tx (electrical or pharmacological) to convert to NSR

permanent AF

inability to convert to NSR w therapy

sx of AF

-reduced exercise tolerance


-weakness


-fatigue


-dizziness


-lightheadedness


-palpitations


-chest pain


-SOB


-syncope




may be asymptomatic!

morbidity of AF

-reduced EF, CO, CHF, hypotension


-valvular and non-valvular AF both increase stroke risk


-overall stroke rate is 4.5%/year


-higher in elderly (18%/yr), lower in "lone" AF (1%/yr)

mortality of AF

independent risk factor post-stroke, post-MI, CHF

outcome goals for AF

direct therapy to:


1. reduce sx


2. reduce morbidity


-improve heart fxn


-reduce incidence of stroke


-reduce emergency department visits


-reduce hospitalization rates


3. improve QOL




no trial w primary endpoint to:


-reduce mortality


-promote cost-effective therapy

specific therapeutic goals for AF

1. control or cure precipitating causes


2. control rapid ventricular rate


3. prevent thromboembolic complications


4. convert AF to NSR


5. reduce recurrences of AF by attempting to maintain NSR

approach to acute AF if: unstable, serious sn/sx

-check oxygen sats, IV line, intubation equipment ready


-> pre-medicate


-> electrical conversion

approach to acute AF: no unstable, serious sn/sx

atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter


-> consider:


-cardiac status?


-duration of AF?


-rate control


-anticoagulation


-conversion

acute ventricular rate control

-slower HR allows ventricles to fill better, improving cardiac hemodynamics


-may reduce AF sx, reduce ED tx time, prevent hospitalization


-drugs MUST work to BLOCK AV Node (beta-blockers, CCB, digoxin, amiodarone)


-"target" acute HR control controversial


-IV agents used if pt is symptomatic

target acute HR control

controversial


-traditionally < 100 bpm


-critically-ill < 120 bpm


-depends on sx and comorbid diagnosis

rate control drugs

beta blockers


calcium blockers


digoxin


amiodarone (miropenem, carbapenem)

tx of AF if cardiac fxn normal

-IV beta blocker


-IV CCB (verapamil or diltiazam)





tx of AF if EF < 40% or HF

-IV digoxin


-IV amiodarone

acute antithrombotic prophylaxis

-blood stasis in fibrillating atria leads to clot formation inside atrial chambers


-electrical, pharm, or spontaneous cardioversion to NSR may restore atrial contraction and eject clot (eg stroke)


-acute antithrombotic prophylaxis choice based on duration of AF episode, hx of recurrence

risk of stroke during active cardioversion w/o antithrombotic therapy

0.8% in AF _< 58 hours duration




5% in AF > 58 hours duration

acute antithrombotic prophylaxis if AF _< 48h

-no antithrombotic therapy reqd

acute antithrombotic prophylaxis if AF > 48h or unknown

conventional approach vs TEE-guided approach




conventional approach:


-warfarin x 3 wk (INR 2-3)


--> if transesophageal echo (TEE) clot then repeat, if no clot, then cardioversion (electrical or rx)


--> warfarin x 4wk (INR 2-3)




TEE-guided approach


-IV heparin/LMWH


->if TEE clot, then warfarin x 3wks (INR 2-3)


-if no clot, cardioversion (electrical or rx)


-> warfarin x 4 wk (INR 2-3)

acute conversion to NSR

-electrical cardioversion or antiarrhythmic drugs


-conversion may reduce sx and improve cardiac hemodynamics by restoring atrial "kick" and eliminating rapid ventricular response


-may reduce ED tx time, and prevent hospitalization




drugs MUST act on ATRIAL TISSUE


-prolong atrial refractory period to convert AF to NSR


-Class IA, IC, III antiarrhythmic drugs

antiarrhythmics

Class IA


Class IC


Class III




make refractory period longer



class IA antiarrhythmic drugs

Quinidine


Procainamide

class IC antiarrhythmic drugs

propafenone


flecainide

class III antiarrhythmic drugs

sotalol


amiodarone


ibutilide

pts where more difficult to actively convert to NSR

-longer duration of AF


-larger left atrium


-low ejection fraction/clinical CHF


-mitral valve regurgitation

consider acute conversion for what pts

-acute AF episode duration for _<48h


-first episode/paroxysmal AF, NOT persistent/permanent


-pts who remain symptomatic despite HR control

when to consider TEE-guided strategy or delayed cardioversion

if AF episode > 48h

ibutilide dose

1mg IV over 10 min, repeat x 1 prn

ibutilide CI

hx of Torsades de pointes


unstable angina


CHF


MI or CABG in past 6mth

procainamide dose

1g IV over 30 min, then 2mg/min

procainamide CI

hx of hypersensitivity


Torsades de pointes

propafenone dose

600mg po single dose

propafenone CI

> 80y/o


unstable angina


MI in past 6mth


CHF _> NYHA class II


sick sinus syndrome

flecainide dose

300mg po single dose

flecainide CI

> 80y/o


unstable angina


MI in past 6mth


CHF _> NYHA class II


sick sinus syndrome

rate control vs rhythm control

much more ADRs for rhythm (amiodarone) control vs rate (diltiazem)


-rhythm had no better outcomes than rate




rhythm had no benefit in all-cause mortality or ischemic stroke

when to use rate control

should be the preferred initial long-term strategy

when to use rhythm control

consider trial for the following:


-pts who remian symptomatic w frequent and/or severe episodes despite rate control therapy




rhythm control did not improve outcomes in heart failure pts, and should not be initial strategy

drugs for chronic ventricular rate control

beta blockers


calcium channel blockers


digoxin


amiodarone




-digoxin, BB, CCB all control resting HR


-BB and CCB control resting and exercise HR


-CCB or digoxin may improve exercise tolerance, BB may worsen exercise tolerance




choose agent based on pt demographics, co-morbid deseases medications, cost

digoxin for chronic ventricular rate control

-less effective in younger pts and does not control exercise-induced HR
-may be an option in elderly pts w CHF who cannot tolerate BB

drugs for chronic ventricular rate control in heart failure pts

beta blocker +/- digoxin

drugs for chronic ventricular rate control in CAD pts

beta blocker (preferred)


CCB (non-dihydropyridine: diltiazem, verapamil)


combination RX

drugs for chronic ventricular rate control in pts w no heart failure or CAD

-beta blocker


-CCB (non-dhydropyridine: diltiazem, verapamil)


-digoxin (may be considered as monotherapy only in particularly sedentary individuals)


-combination rx

chronic antiarrhythmic therapy not indicated for

-not indicated after single episode of AF, or infrequent asymptomatic AF

chronic antiarrhythmic therapy drugs

all more effective than placebo at maintaining NSR:


quinidine


disopyramide


propafenone


flecainide


sotalol


amiodarone


dronedarone




in general, amiodarone may delay recurrences of AF better than other agents but more ADE


-agent selection depends on co-morbid conditions (HT, CAD, HF), meds, ADE profile

dronedarone efficacy

-effective at controlling HR in AF/AFL


-prolongs time to first recurrence of symptomatic AF in popn primarily w/o HF


-increases mortality in popn of admitted HF pts w NHYA class II, III, IV


-prolongs time to "first" hospitalization due to CV event in pts w hx of paroxysmal/persistent AF




has not been compared directly to propafenone, flecainide or sotalol

dronedarone SEs

increases risk of:


-rash


-n/v/d


-QTc prolongation


-creatinine increase


-drug interactions


-WD due to ADEs

dronedarone new risks

-reports of acute liver toxicity, transplants, deaths


-report of 'PALLAS' study, increased risk of stroke, hospitalization for HF, CV death




do not use dronedarone for AF pts w HF< rate control for permanent AF, or pts at risk of liver toxicity

chronic antiarrhythmic therapy: no co-morbidity or HT alone

first choice:


-propafenone


-flecainide


-sotalol




alternative


-amiodarone


-dofetilide

chronic antiarrhythmic therapy: CAD (stable, post-ACS, or PCI)

first choice:


-sotalol


-amiodarone




alternative:


-dofelitide

chronic antiarrhythmic therapy: heart failure

first choice:


-amiodarone




alternative:


-dofetilide