Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
30 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
central/systematic route
|
evaluating the merits of the object. the central features. high motivation needed to do this
|
|
peripheral/heuristic route
|
used when you're relying on the peripheral features of the object. other cues that are persuasive but not central merits
|
|
ability to focus
petty et al |
cannot always focus
students are more persuaded by strong message than week when not distracted. but when distracted, messages equally persuasive |
|
motivation to focus
|
1.strong/week message -central
2.expert/non expert-peripheral 3.take effect now/5 years-central |
|
attractiveness
|
more attractive people are more convincing
|
|
similarity
|
we are more persuaded by those who are like us, or little better (highschool to middleschooler)
|
|
credibility
|
need someone who seems trustworthy. (often peripheral cue)
|
|
sleeper effect
|
when you read something, take source into account at first, but then over time, source fades and info later becomes more persuasive
|
|
hovland & weiss
|
with no delay- credible source more convincing than non-credible
with delay-credible and non credible report same belief in argument |
|
lenth
|
long messages generally better
but short and good is better than long and fluffy (in central processing) |
|
order
|
recency or primacycan be best.
spread between messages and then lenigh of decision makes difference. a-b-week: a wins a-week-b: b wins |
|
discrepancy
|
how much does the message disagree with your view? messages that really go against plls beliefs have no impack
|
|
positive emotion
|
try and put you in good mood bc less critical judge and more easily persuaded
|
|
subliminal
|
subliminal perception has very short term effects but does work.
liquor stores: music affects type of wine you buy |
|
audience
|
who are you persuading?
high/low SM pll influences how much they are persuaded by advertising |
|
strategies of persuasion
|
dependant on interpersonal dynamics/relations
|
|
foot in the door
|
2 step technique: get someone to do something small and then ask for something big.
|
|
Freedman & Fraser (foot in the door)
|
put small sticker on door...then asked to put large sign on front yard. people put sticker will put sign up more than no sticker pll
|
|
door in the face
|
contrast effect:
ask for something huge and pll reject...then ask for something small and they say yes bc just said no |
|
cialdini (door in the face)
|
asked students to chaperone juvenile delinquents at zoo...then ask to mentor everyday/2 weeks. will take them to the zoo
|
|
low-balling
|
agree to something and then people tell you all the details...cant back out at that point
|
|
caldini (low balling)
|
ppl asked to be in psych study...yes...7am in morning
already committed! |
|
"thats not all"
|
try to convince someone to buy something/do something but keep adding things to deal..think its a bargain
fail to realize they dont need it |
|
giving no outs for donation
|
ppl dont donate bc dont have time/money. campaigns emphasize fact that dont need time or money...ppl have to give penny...give more and more participate
|
|
scarcity(of numbers or time)
|
make ppl feel that time is running out they rush to irrational decisions (HSN)
|
|
pennebaker et al (scarcity)
|
bar example:
9 people think same sex 1030 about equal 12 opposite looking better |
|
forewarning
|
if you initially tell someone that someone is going to pursuade them then they can prepare
|
|
inoculation
|
give person small amount of persuasion effort so they can prepare to fight the view & when persaded with bigger...prepared to fight back
|
|
reactance
|
ppl resist being told what to do & then when someone tries to persuade them they become even strong in own views
kids with no candy rule growing up go crazy for candy later |
|
albarracin et al (reactance)
|
ppl given abtinence vs. moderation message with drinking
ppl drink more when abstinence only message |