• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/47

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

47 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Virtue (Machiavelli)
manliness, courage
Epistemology
the study of knowledge
Solipsism
the notion that the self's thoughts is the only real object of knowledge
Skepticism
notion that it is impossible to have any certain knowledge of anything including science, religion, or yourself
Dualism
notion that mind and matter are two different entities
Liberty (Hobbes)
The freedom to realize your desires without impediments
Liberty (Locke)
more limited than license, every man has the right to life, liberty, happiness, and private property
State of Nature (Hobbes)
State of war in human interaction in the absence of effective government
State of Nature (Locke)
Before the institution of government, Humans are naturally social beings
Natural Right (Hobbes)
every man has the right to use his own power for the preservation of his own Nature and to realize his desires without impediments.
Great Schism
the division of the church after pope Gregory dies, two popes were elected (French Pope and Roman Pope)
Natural Right (Locke)
every man has the right to life, liberty, happiness, and private property
License (Locke)
pure unbridled freedom
Faith (Luther)
Faith occurs at the moment you recognize that all things in you are blameworthy, sinful, and damnable, for in that moment you realize you need Christ
Babylonian Captivity
When Pope Clement moves papacy from Rome to France
Indulgences
The remission of temporal punishment still due for a sin that has been sacramentally absolved
Aristotle vs. Aquinas on Happiness
Aristotle thinks philosophy is enough to acquire happiness here, not on earth but Aquinas thinks that faith must complement your living in order for you to be as happy as you can be here on earth, true happiness is to be found after this life
2nd proof for the existence of God
Efficient cause

things efficiently cause one another

the cause is at least as great as the effect produced, because we witness causes and effects there must have been one cause that started all thesecauses and effects
Thomas vs. Aristotle on happiness and politics
Aristotle

Humans are rational beings and rationality is our telos

We fulfill our telos by contemplating/imitate perfect rationality

Aristotle concludes ultimate human happiness comes in the activity of contemplation

Thomas

Human beings have a telos to be rational and love god

Ultimate happiness comes from contemplating the source of all goodness and perfection

God is the source of all goodness and perfection

Concludes that contemplation of God will bring ultimate happiness
Petrarch on Christianity, fortune, death, and Roman heros
wavers in faith, questions about what will happen when he dies

goes back to old stories with great Vir

happiness rests in how well humans can free themselves from suffering
Machiavelli on fortune
fortunes affects people who don’t prepare for it, fail to prepare, prepare to face fortune
difference between Machiavelli and Petrarch
petrarch just trying to rule himself for himself

machiavelli wants to rule other people for himself
Machiavelli's theory of virtue and prudence and how it differs from Aristotle
man of practical wisdom wants to find mean between excess and deficiency but the good ruler wants to go in excess, prudence for Aristotle was all about doing the right thing in the right time for the right reasons but Machiavelli wants to do the right thing in the right time but not for the right reasons (what is most effective for me to remain in power)

prudence here means calculating, be shrewd, scheming
vicious person for Aristotle looks like the good ruler for Machiavelli
Cause/Result of Great Schism
Issue of money leads church to splitting and reunifying after the schism

If there are two Popes, which Pope is the authoritative Pope when it comes to matters of church doctrine?

Skeptical of authority of either Pope

People outside the church are starting to call church out on hypocrisy, they are guided by political and financial interests
Wycliffe
You don’t get doctrinal authority from Pope, get it from scripture itself

distinguish the true church from the church on Earth, the institutional church

we should institute a policy of poverty for religious figures

Should translate bible into english
Hus
brings Wycliffe's theories to Prague

go to the Ecumemical Council and gets burned at the stake
95 Theses
iIf the pope can grant indulgences (which he can’t) than what is his motivation from charging other than for his own self indulgences, even the saints cant take years off their purgatory

only love and faith and Christ can save a person
Luther on justification by faith and his differences from Paul
Justification by faith alone

Luther takes authority away from Pope and gives it to scripture

Paul goes from justification from faith alone to establish a church that includes everyone whereas Luther goes from church to individual
Bacon's relation to Machiavelli (4)
says can’t have enough charity, donation to humanity in general

Bacon turns humanity into a tool to conquer nature, Machiavelli turns man into animals to conquer each other

Bacon there is a definitive technique, no technique for Machiavelli

Machiavelli says no tradition at all, Bacon says I don’t want to deal with the old tradition but I want to start a new one
Bacon's reasons for the great instauration
wanted to create a science that would be transferable from generation to generation in the same way that we are creating tools and invention that we hand down from generation to generation

wants to develop a method to eventually know as God knows
emergence of skepticism
(16th and 17th Century)

people are trying to deal with two problems

science (external) - new structure of universe, heliocentric model

church (internal) - great schism, Martin Luther

puts church's authority into question, people want to know where to turn to ground meaning of their lives
Decartes relation to skepticism
Decartes is motivated to try and reestablish foundations for which religion and science can be rebuilt

want to see if he can disprove skepticism by doubting everything in order to find something that is certain
what are the types of skepticism Descartes employs?
Senses, Reality, Math
Senses (Decartes thoughts)
not always certain, constantly giving conflicting information about the world

cant be measure for establishing certainty
Reality (decartes thoughts)
the fact that there are senses whether they are right or wrong means that there is something there but since you can't always distinguish between dreams and reality, you can't use reality as a starting point either
Math (decartes thoughts)
concepts are real but they are not tangible

could be chance God is deceiving us

2+2 = 7? math cant be form of foundation of knowledge
4 characteristics of Cartesian doubt
Methodological form of doubting

Universal form of doubting - doubt everything

Provisional - if he can find something certain he will try to bring back all the things he originally discarded

Theoretical
Descartes refutation of Skepticism
if you say "I don't have a mind" then in some sense that is indubitable, if you are thinking then you must exist to do the thinking

performative contradiction - in the performance of uttering the statement "I doubt that I exist" you prove the opposite of what you have stated
Bob thinks therefore Bob exists

T of F
False
I think I see a light

T or F
True
I think therefore I am

T or F
True
anything that is anchored in the phrase I think is true

T or F
True
things that are certain
thoughts
ideas
pictures
copies
things that are uncertain
material, mathematical, reality, body, other persons, nature
Problems with Decartes response to skepticism
Problem of Generation (origin) - where do these copies come from?

Problem of Correspondence (resemblance) - do the ideas correspond to the things they are supposed to relate
How does Descartes prove god exists and that he is good?

What implications does this have?
See Notes
Formal vs. Objective Sense (decartes)
Formal - thinking about thinking
(can't get anywhere so we throw this out)

Objective - thinking about the "what"
(use hierarchy to prove God's existence)