• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/10

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

10 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Review Of New Matter Objections And Rejections
New matter both rejected and objected is APPEALLABE not PETITION.
Final Rejection – Time For Reply
If applicant replies w/i 2 months after mailing final rejection and an Advisory Action is mailed after 3-month shortened statutory period, extension fee is counted from the date of the mailing AA.
37 CFR § 1.85(a) - Correction of drawing
Correcting the drawings to comply with 37 CFR § 1.84(a)(1) and (k), and making them suitable for reproduction is a bona fide response
Minimum Requirements for an IDS
NO information in the IDS be disclosed w/i 3 months from IDS filing date.
Capture Bibliographic Information in ADS
ADS errors may be recaptured by request, supplemental ADS submission, and oath/declaration under 37 CFR § 1.63 or § 1.67/letter pursuant to 37 CFR 1.33(b).
Affidavit Practice - 37 CFR 1.132
Disclosure of factual evidence of time, effort and knowledge required for the practice of invention can rebut a prima facie case of nonenablement rejection.
Impermissible Recapture
Exists if the limitation being omitted or broadened was originally presented/argued/stated to overcome objection/rejection
Continuation Application
Filed under 35 USC 111(a) with new and proper specification, any necessary drawings, signed declaration and all required fees.
Continued status of small entity.
Continuation, divisional, or CIP application, including a CPA or reissue application requires a new assertion of small entity status.
A Product Appearing To Be Substantially Identical Is Found And A 35 U.S.C. 102/103 Rejection Made
Although produced by a different process, the burden shifts to applicant to prove an unobvious difference between claimed product and prior art.