• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/53

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

53 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Parol Evidence

Limits Admissibility


of Prior Expressions


or contemporaneous (with signing)oral statements


Applies to writings


Final Contract is Most Reliable

Parol Evidence Test


When would it be raised

Final Written Contract


Court determines contract is final between parties


Either Oral statement contemporaneous with signing


or earlier written or oral statement by the parties


Integration

Written agreement intended to be the final contract between the parties.



Does not have to be complete


If there is complete intigration

Statements are inadmissible to contradict or supliment

If there is partial intigrationq

In admissible if the evidence would contradict a term of the writing



Admissible to supplement the contract

The Parol Evidence Rule does not apply regardless of completeness

Statements that contradict contract to show mistake in integration (clerical error)



To show Defense to contract formation



To show condition precedent



To show consistent collateral contract normally not included in integration



To clarify ambiguous terms

Parol Evidence Rule does not apply if partial integration

To add consistent terms



Sometimes to show the existence of ambiguity

Merge Clause

Indicates that the contract is a final integration of the agreement between the parties

Reformation

Equitable action to modify a written contract to reflect the true intent of the parties

Interpreting Terms

Four Corners


Plain Meaning


Liberal Approach

Four Corners

Integration governed by the four corners of the contract itself


No extrinsic evidence admissible to determine ambiguity

Plain Meaning

Court will consider evidence of the context of the agreement to determine ambiguity but not evidence of preliminary negotiations

Liberal Approach

Court will consider evidence of preliminary negotiations to determine ambiguity

Maxims of Interpetation

As a Whole


Primary Purpose


Words

As a whole

Writing is interpreted as a whole and all writings are part of the same transaction are interpreted together

Primary Purpose

If the primary purpose of the parties is ascertainable, that purpose is given great weight

Words

Specific terms and exact terms are given greater weight than general language



Seperately negotiated or added terms are given greater weight than standardized terms or other terms not separately negotiated (pre-printed forms)



Ambiguities Construed Against the Drafter



Prevailing meaning controls unless a different intention is manifested



Technical Terms and Words of Art are given their technical meaning when used in a transaction within their technical field

Course of Performance

Given less weight than express terms


Wherever reasonable


Used to manifest intent of the parties


Given greater weight than course of Dealing or Usage of Trade

Course of Dealing

Different Contracts between same people


Given greater weight than Usage of Trade


Usage of Trade

Other different but similar contracts between different people in the trade

UCC Default Provisions

Used for sales of goods where terms are left out



Delivery obligation


Risk of Loss


Delivery Obligations

Time for Delivery


Place for Delivery


Common Carrier or not


Merchant Seller or not

Time for delivery

Within a Reasonable time

Place for delivery

SELLER's place of business


or if none


Seller's Residence


Delivery by other than common carrier

Merchant Seller - Delivery obligation complete when the buyer receives goods at seller's place of business or location of goods known to buyer



Non-Merchant Seller - Seller's delivery obligation is complete when the seller tenders the goods (tells the buyer where the goods are and how to get them)

Delivery by common carrier

Third Party Carrier



Shipment Contracts



Destination Contracts

Shipment Contracts

FOB Seller's City


Presumed when contract is silent and common carrier required.


Obligation of Seller is complete when delivered to carrier with


Arrangements for delivery,


Necessary documentation and


Prompt notification to seller.


Failure to notify is grounds for rejection only where there is a material delay or a loss ensues

Destination Contracts

FOB city other than seller's


Seller obligated to deliver goods to a specific location


Obligation not satisfied until goods actually arrive at the final destination

Risk of Loss

Agreement of the Parties


Breach


Non-Common Carrier


Common Carrier


Warranties of Quality


Price


Payment


UCC Parol Evidence Rule

Agreement of the Parties

Controls as to risk of loss

Breach

Breaching Party is liable for any uninsured loss even if the loss is completely unrelated to the breach

Non-Carrier Delivery Risk of Loss

Seller bears risk of loss until completion of delivery obligation

Common Carrier Delivery Risk of Loss

Shipment Contract - Risk of loss shifts to buyer when the seller delivers to the carrier



Destination Contract - Risk of loss does not shift until seller delivers at final destination

Warranties of Quality

Express Warranty


Implied Warranty


Limitations on Warranties


Third Party Beneficiaries


Express Warranty of Quality

Statement of Fact


Promise


Conduct (showing a sample or model)


Statements of value or opinion are not express warranties

Implied Warranties of Quality

Warranty of Title - Automatically implied


Merchantability - Automatic for sales of goods by merchant of those goods

Warranty of Merchantability

Requires Fitness for Ordinary Purpose - Implied in every contract for the sale of a good by a seller who is a merchant with respect to goods of that kind


Includes limited definition of Merchant


Includes Warranty against Infringement

Limited Definition of Merchant

Must be in the business of selling goods of this kind

Warranty against infringement

Goods shall be free of the rightful claim of any patent, trademark or copyright infringement

Implied Fitness for a Particular Purpose

Goods must be fit for the particular purpose the buyer has in mind if the seller is aware of it

Contractual Limitations on Warranties

Disclaimers


Limitations of Remedies

Disclaimers

Eliminates Warranties


Not valid for Express Warranties


Valid for implied warranty of merchantability of conspicuous

Conspicuous

Different Font or Print than the rest of the contract

limitations of Remedies

Must be Conscionable


Unconscionability must be Prima Facia

Third Party Beneficiaries of Express or Implied Warranties

UCC Alternatives A,B and C

Alternative A

Most states have adopted this Narrow version



Extends to


Any natural Person


In the Family


or


Household


Of the Buyer


or


Guest



Must be reasonable to expect that such a person may use, consume or be affected by the goods



Must have been injured in person by breach of warranty

Alternative B

Extends to ANY Natural Person reasonably expected to Use, consume or be affected by the goods who is injured in person by the breach

Alternative C

Any Natural Person who is injured etc. (removes 'in person' requirement

Price

Reasonable at time of delivery if



Nothing said about price


or


Left for the parties to agree on and they fail to agree


or


Price is to be fixed in terms of some agreed market or other standard as set by a third person or agency and is not set

Price fixed by buyer or seller

Must be in good faith

Price payable in goods

If each party is a seller of goods

Payment

If not specified - at time and place where buyer is to receive the goods

Oral condition to performance not written in contract. eg contractor will take job if other job falls through. Is evidence of condition admissible?

Yes, extrinsic evidence is allowed to establish an oral condition too the parties performance under the contract