Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
44 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
What is P's liability if his dog bites someone for the first time?
|
Negligence
|
|
What is the standard for P's liability if his dog bits someone for the second time?
|
Strict liability (because P keeps an animal with known dangerous propensities)
|
|
What is the standard for keeping wild animals?
|
Strict liability
|
|
How do safety precautions play into keeping wild animals?
|
They don't - ignore them - because strict liability applies
|
|
What is an abnormally dangerous activity? (2 parts)
|
Foreseeable risk of serious harm even when reasonable care is exercised, not in common use in community
|
|
What is the effect of contributory negligence on an intentional tort?
|
None - they can never recover on negligence claim against landowner/possessor
|
|
What is the effect of contributory negligence under traditional common law?
|
P's negligence completely barred recovery, unless last clear chance applies
|
|
What is the last clear chance doctrine?
|
P recovers despite contributory negligence; the person with the last clear chance to avoid an accident who fails to do so is liable for negligence
|
|
Is last clear chance used in comparative negligence jurisdictions?
|
No
|
|
What is assumption of risk?
|
If P knew of risk and voluntarily proceeded in face of the risk, P may be denied recovery in strict liability
|
|
Is a casual seller a merchant?
|
No.
|
|
Is a service provider a merchant of goods provided that are incidental to the service?
|
No
|
|
Is a lessor a merchant for purposes of strict liability?
|
Yes
|
|
Every firm in a product distribution change is…
|
A merchant subject to strict liability
|
|
Is privity required for strict liability?
|
No
|
|
What is liability for reasonably foreseeable damages done by a trespass of his animals?
|
Strict liability
|
|
Is an owner strictly liable for damages by wild animals to trespassers?
|
No
|
|
How to tell when a product has a design defect?
|
Hypothetical alternative design is safer, cost-justified, and practical
|
|
How to tell when a product has a manufacturing defect?
|
An unusual problem - the one in a million - exploding toaster!
|
|
When is a warning necessary?
|
If a product has physical risk that can't be remedied by different designs, and consumer would not be aware of them
|
|
What is the effect of a product that needs a warning but lacks it?
|
It's like a defective design
|
|
When will a warning not remove liability?
|
When the product can physically be altered to be safer at a low cost
|
|
How can P prove a manufacturing defect?
|
By showing that the product failed to perform as safely as an ordinary consumer would expect
|
|
Must D anticipate reasonable misuse?
|
Yes
|
|
Compliance with government safety standards is…
|
Nonconclusive evidence that product is not defective
|
|
Noncompliance with government safety standards is …
|
Conclusively establishes that the product is defective
|
|
What about strict liability and knives?
|
Manufactures will not be held liable for some dangerous products if danger is apparent and there is no safer way to make the product
|
|
Can a bystander sue a commercial supplier in the chain of distribution in strict liability?
|
Yes - there is no privity requirement
|
|
Does comparative negligence reduce recovery in strict liability cases?
|
Yes
|
|
When is employer liable for employee's intentional tort?
|
When job involves danger (repo man), authorized violence (bouncer), or when employee is engaged in a misguided effort to serve boss's purposes
|
|
When is hiring party liable for tort of independent contractor?
|
When hiring party is land possessor and P is an invitee (duty to invitee is nondelegable)
|
|
When is car owner liable for tort of driver?
|
When driver is using the car to do an errand for owner
|
|
Are parents liable for the torts of their kids?
|
No, but parents can be liable in negligence for actions that led to tort (e.g., leaving loaded gun around)
|
|
What to watch for in vicarious liability questions?
|
D may not be vicariously liable, but D can be liable for underlying tort
|
|
When does indemnification apply?
|
Vicarious liability (e.g., car owner from driver), products liability (for nonmanufacturer from manufacturers)
|
|
What recovery for loss of consortium?
|
Services, society, sexual intimacy
|
|
May a landowner use a vicious dog to protect only his property?
|
No!
|
|
When does governmental immunity not apply?
|
When government is engaged in an activity that is normally conducted by private industry
|
|
Does a city operating a parking lot for profit retain government immunity re activities in the parking lot?
|
No, because it's enacting in an activity that's normally conducted by private industry
|
|
Just because one party is negligent doesn't mean other potential Ds aren't …
|
liable, too (either strictly or in negligence)
|
|
Which determines matters of law, judge or jury?
|
Judge
|
|
Which determines whether an activity is abnormally dangerous?
|
Judge, because it is a mater of law
|
|
Which decides whether misuse of product is reasonably foreseeable?
|
Jury
|
|
Which decides whether inadequate warnings make product so defective as to be unreasonably dangerous?
|
Jury
|