• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/7

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

7 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Provide a brief history of opium and its derivatives.
Source - opium poppy, Papaver somniferum
Origin - Asia Minor
Name - from the Greek ‘opion’ (poppy juice)
Effects - pain relief, euphoria, narcosis
6000y (Sumerians)
TO EUROPE:

Via Arabic influences on Western medicine
use widespread in Europe by mid-C16
included in many patent medicines
e.g. ‘laudanum’ - Paracelsus
PROBLEMS & REFINEMENT

Variation in purity of opium led to variation in its effects, from analgesia to death
Dosing precision aided by:
1803 - Serturner isolates active ingredient and names it morphine (after Morpheus, the Greek God of dreams)
late C19 - invention of syringe & hypodermic needle
DOUBLE-EDGED PROGRESS

medical progress paralleled by growth in opiate abuse
Medical concern: opium smoking, opium ‘eating’, patent medicines, US Civil War
Public concern: Opium Wars, popular writings e.g. Thomas de Quincey

25% raw opium made up of alkaloids
of these, morphine accounts for 40%
remaining 60% = c.20 other compounds
 most relevant
codeine - mild analgesic (action?)
papa
Discuss role played by addiction in opiate research.
CHRONIC EFFECTS:

tolerance
shift to the right in dose-response curve
variations in tolerance
cross-tolerance

dependence
‘withdrawal’ or ‘abstinence’ syndrome
symptoms opposite those of acute opiate effects
rarely fatal
PRIMARY ABSTINENCE SYNDROME:

begins within a few hours of discontinuation
agitation, yawning, insomnia
glandular hyperactivity -‘cold turkey’
severe stomach cramps
involuntary muscle spasms -‘kicking the habit’
compulsive drug craving
severity gradually declines over days
RELAPSE:

secondary abstinence
lasts weeks after main physical symptoms disappear
state of physical/psychological unease

conditioned abstinence
lasts long after primary/secondary abstinence
occasioned by cues previously associated with environment in which drugs sought/taken
(associative learning)

Both cases: user awareness of ‘cure’
JANUS-LIKE PROFILE

opiates have desirable (pain relief) and undesirable (dependence) effects
research goal to produce non-addictive analgesics
biochemical modific
Outline evidence (indirect and direct) for opiate receptors and endogenous opioids.
One way to explain powerful effects of opiates is to postulate existence of specific receptors
Beckett & Casey (1954): indirect evidence
effects seen at low doses
phenomenon of cross-tolerance
similarity of molecular structure
stereospecifity
small structural change = opiate antagonists

l-isomers
active

mirror-image
d-isomers
(not shown)
inactive
DIRECT EVIDENCE!
discovery of opiate binding sits in brain

Radioligand binding
1971 - Avram GOLDSTEIN (Palo Alto)
disappointing results (<2% specific)
1973 - Solomon SNYDER (Baltimore)
Lars TERENIUS (Uppsala)
Eric SIMON (New York)
all 3 groups reported 80+% specific binding: difference lay in affinity of the radioligand employed

Although possible that binding sites were a mere artefact:-
binding was found to be stereospecific
high correlations found between affinity & effect

inhibition of smooth muscle contractions
clinical efficacy as analgesics
binding sites therefore true ‘receptors’
LOCALISATION:

found in all vertebrates &
Explain adaptive value of pain.
PAIN PATHWAYS:
Neo: conveys sharp fast pain
Paleo: conveys dull slow pain
Opiate receptors dense in
paleospinothalamic system, & opiate drugs clinically useful only in dull aching
pain

opiate receptors could not have evolved to interact with plant-derived or synthetic opiates
endogenous morphine-like factor must exist?
skepticism fostered by early failures to detect

one key finding ensured survival of the ‘endogenous opiate’ hypothesis
stimulation-produced analgesia

David Reynolds (1969) - electrical stimulation of brain produces profound analgesia (SPA)
key region - periaqueductal gray matter (PAG) of the midbrain
Huda Akil et al (1974) - SPA prevented by opiate antagonist, naloxone
implication?
stimulation  endogenous opiate release in PAG, analgesia via opiate receptors in this region
FIRST ENDOGENOUS "opiates" DISCOVERED:

1975-6 Hughes & Kosterlitz (Aberdeen)*
Terenius (Uppsala)
Snyder (Baltimore)

* elegantly simple approach used to identify endogenous opiates in
Summarize Gate Control theory of pain.

pain is adaptive
pain is multidimensional & variable

Gate Control Theory

Postulated a ‘gating’ mechanism in the spinal cord that determines whether or not pain messages are sent to brain
Gate is controlled not only by competing sensory inputs but also by descending mechanisms
Describe research demonstrating existence of intrinsic pain inhibitory systems.
PAG rich in opiate receptors/opioid peptides
Stimulation-produced analgesia is reversed by naloxone [Reynolds 1969; Akil et al 1974]
Direct application of morphine in PAG also produces analgesia that is naloxone-reversible [Yaksh et al 1976]
Lesions to descending pathways from PAG to spinal cord block both forms of analgesia [Basbaum & Fields 1979]

Q: a powerful intrinsic analgesia system exists centered on the midbrain PAG, but why?
A: to inhibit pain - not good enough!

the key question concerns the circumstances under which the system is normally engaged
ironically, first clue came with demonstration that system can be triggered by pain itself
Akil et al (1976) - footshock induces naloxone-reversible analgesia in rats
confirmed by many labs who also reported analgesia in response to diverse stressors (most non-painful)
But not all found to involve opioid substrates

Cannon et al (1982): 2 regions of PAG, dorsal & ventral
stimulation of ventral PAG - opioid analgesia
stimulation of dorsal PAG - non-
Consider in detail research on the adaptive significance of pain inhibition for living organisms.
"STRESS" ANALGESIA

Akil et al (1976) - footshock induces naloxone-reversible analgesia in rats
confirmed by many labs who also reported analgesia in response to diverse stressors (most non-painful)
But not all found to involve opioid substrates

Cannon et al (1982): 2 regions of PAG, dorsal & ventral
stimulation of ventral PAG - opioid analgesia
stimulation of dorsal PAG - non-opioid analgesia
2 pain inhibitory systems opioid & non-opioid

Electrical stimulation of both dPAG and vPAG produces analgesia
Only the analgesia from vPAG is blocked by naloxone

Watkins & Mayer (1982,1986)
Terman et al (1984)
Rodgers & Randall (1988)
Butler & Finn (2009)
focus: underlying mechanisms as revealed by pharmacology, biochemistry & endocrinology
identify at least 4 intrinsic analgesia systems
doubly-dissociated on two dimensions

neural vs endocrine mechanisms
opioid vs non-opioid mechanisms



Liebeskind et al. (1976)
‘Analgesia may be an adaptive response to dire circumstances, enabling the organism to defensiv