• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/15

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

15 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
ETDRS
CSME criteria: 1) RT w/in 500 microns; 2) lipid w/in 500 w/ assoc RT; 3) >1DD w/in 1DD of fovea
DRS
high PDR criteria: 3 or more of the following:
1) Any NV of fundus;
2) NV w/in 1 DD of disc
3) Pre-retinal heme
4) NV of moderate extent
DCCT (DM control & complication trial)
Type 1 DM, BS control decreases risk of DR; results in PDR & ME in 3 & 5 yrs respectively
BVOS
grid60% better than 20/40; control34% better than 20/40; PRP helps reduce NV (if present) or helps prevent NV for nonperfusion >5DD however, since NV only develops in 31% w/ >5DD ischemia, wait for NV to do PRP; conclusion: grid if >20/40 & >3mo; only applies to pts w/ perfused maculae (ischemic macula pts were excluded from study)
CVOS
Grid—improved edema but not VA, therefore, not recommended; >10DA ischemia  25-30% NV w/in 3 yrs; PRP reduced incidence of NV but was not statistically significant; PRP reduced efficacy of future lasers if needed
Endophthalmitis vitrectomy study
if ≥HM, T&I=vtx; if <HM vtx better than T&I; no difference w/ systemic Abx; eligibility: presumed bact endoph >6 wk PO CE
ANCHOR
IVit Ranizumab=11 letters better than PDT for acute classic AMD
Macular photocoagulation study
argon decreased vision loss or at least preserved visual function for CNV subfoveal (worse VA but better visual function), juxtafoveal (1-199um from fovea) & extrafoveal (>200um from Fovea)
subfoveal new CNV studay from MPS
eligibility: small lesions w/ VA<20/80 (Best candidate for laser= VA <20/125 (lesions <1DA) or <20/200 (lesions <2DA), No benefit=lesions >3DA & VA >20/200); short & long term, contrast sensitivity preserved by laser; short term-VA & reading speed decreased in tx group (improved long term)
silicone oil study group
C3F8 & oil were much more successful than SF6 for PVR RD reattachment tamponade
HEDS
HSV: stromal keratitis: Topical steroids reduced persistence or progression; delayed steroids slowed resolution but did not help long term visual outome; gradual taper of steroids; viroptic does not help
OHTS
risk factors for OHTCOAG: age, race, IOP, ON anatomy, CCT
CIGTS (collaborative initial glaucoma tx study)
Rx vs Sx on long term progression; Sx group=more likely to lose VA & VF in first few years but after 4 years, groups were similar
IONDT (ischemic optic neuropathy decompression trial)
30% w/ NAION w/ ON sheath decompression had improvement of 3+ lines @ 6 months; 40% on observation group improved by 3+ lines; surgery=higher risk of loss of 3+ lines (24% vs 12%)
ONTT (optic neuritis tx trial)
PO steroids had no significant improvement than control group & increase recurrence rate; IV + PO steroidsfaster recovery & slight improvement over control