Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
131 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
problem
|
percieved discrepancy b/t the current state of affairs and desired state
|
|
decesions
|
choices we make among alternatives
|
|
program decesions
|
well structured for certain things that arise
|
|
non-program decesions
|
new situation or unique experience
|
|
3 types of programmed decesions
|
1.policy-borad
2.porcedure-more specific 3.rules-very specfic |
|
6 steps in rational decesion making
|
1.define the problem
2.indentify the decesino 3.allocate weights to the criteria 4.develop the alternatives 5.evaluate ' ' 6.select the best |
|
implemenatation
|
-decesion by itself changes nothing..must be implemented
-decesion quality can only be determined from consequences |
|
evaluation decesion effectiveness-5
|
1.problem still exsist?
2.problem defined properly? 3.alternatives evaluated? 4.right one chosen? 5.implementation effective? |
|
rational decesion making
|
how we should behave to maxamize outcome
|
|
myth of rationality
|
-org.'s are not emotion free
-emotions of any kind are bad-> good goal but not rational |
|
bounded rationality
|
pick the first decesion that satisfices our needs....make decesions by constructing simplified models that extract the essential features from the problems w/out capturing all their complexity
|
|
3 decesion making conditions
|
1.uncertainty
2.certainty 3.risk |
|
role of intuition
|
previous experience...gut level
|
|
escalations of commitemtn
|
continuous commitment to a previous bad decesion
|
|
intuitive decesion making
|
making decesions on the basis of experience, feelings, and judgement
|
|
satisficing
|
selecting a solution that is satisfactory rather than the best decesion
|
|
3 ethical decesion criteria
|
1.utilitarianism-greatest good for greatest number
2.rights -respecting and protecting basic rights 3.justice-imposing and enforcing rules fairly |
|
5 ways to improvme decesion making style
|
1.adjust your style to fit situation
2.be aware of biases 3.combine rational anaylis w/ intutiion 4.dont assume decesion is approriate in every situation 5.be creative |
|
creativity
|
combining new ideas in unique ways or associating ideas in unusual ways
|
|
innovation
|
turning creative ideas into useful products, services, or methods of operation
|
|
groups
|
2 or more indiviudals interacting and interdependent who have come together to achive paricular objective
|
|
formal and informal groups
|
f-managment team
i-friend group |
|
why we join groups -6
|
1.security
2.status 3.self-esteem 4.affiliation 5.power 6.goal achievement |
|
categories of teams
|
1.purpose
2.structure 3.membership 4.duration |
|
probelm solving teams
|
5-12 employees from same dept. to solve work problems
|
|
cross-functional teams
|
employees from different depts. taht come together to probelm solve
|
|
virtual teams
|
teams taht use computer technology to coordinate work...one in brazil, france, etc.
|
|
stages of development
|
1.prestage
2.forming 3.storming 4.norming 5.performing 6.adjourning |
|
punctuated equilibrium theory
|
nothing gets accomplished until the 2nd half of the alloted time in groups
|
|
interdepdence
|
-when any event depends more than one single agent
-when one person does not control all the conditions neccessary for achieving the desired outcome |
|
why are teams so popular
|
-out perform individ.
-use employee talents better -more flexible -inovlement -democrative |
|
roles
|
expected behvaior patterns
|
|
role identity
|
certain attitudes and behavior consistent w/ a role
|
|
role perception
|
view of how individual is supposed to act in a given stiuatino
|
|
role expectations
|
how others think an individual should act
|
|
psychological contract
|
unwritten contract b/t management expects from employee(vice-versa)
|
|
role conflict
|
situation where individual is confronted by divergent role expectations
|
|
norms
|
acceptable standards of behavior w/in a group that are shared by the group members
|
|
conformity
|
adjusting ones behavior to align w/ the norms of the group
|
|
reference groups
|
important groups to which individuals belong to or hope to belong to
|
|
asch's study
|
people in group were looking at size of line. person in on it woudl say the wrong answer and everyone would agree with the person
|
|
deviant behavior
|
inappropirate anti-social norms taht are intentionally violating the norms-->resualt in negative consequence for individ and org.
|
|
4 types of deviant behavior
|
1.production:leave early/work slow
2.property:sabatoge 3.political:gossiping 4.personal agresssion: sexual harrassement |
|
status
|
socially defined position or rank given to group members
|
|
social loafing
|
tendency for individuals to expend less effort when working in group(free-rider)
|
|
ringlemen effect
|
tug-of-war experiement...less inidivdual effot in groups than when working by yourself
|
|
best types of groups
|
odd number and 7 or 9
|
|
small groups
|
tasks faster
better use of facts |
|
large groups
|
solove problems better
diverse input better fact-finder |
|
group demography
|
share a commmon contribution(sex,age)
|
|
cohorts
|
individuals in a group w/ common attribute
|
|
cohsivness
|
degree to which people are attracted to each other...motivated to stay in group
|
|
realationship b/t performance and productivity
|
-hight cohesivness and high perform norms: high productiv
-high cohsiv and low norms: low productivity |
|
low cohesino
|
no too much performance w/ some productivity
|
|
high cohesion
|
really productive or really bad(extremes)
|
|
group think
|
phenomenon in which the norms for consequences overrides the realistic apprasial of alternative course of action
-rationalize resistance -direct preassure on unapposed -illusion of unamity |
|
group shift
|
change in decesion risk b/t the groups decesion and the individ decesion that member w/in the group would make
|
|
synergy
|
action of 2 or more substances-result in a different effect from individ summation of individ
|
|
social-facilitation
|
more preense of someone that is watching you causes your to chang your beavhior
|
|
decesion making techniques for groups
|
1.brainstorming
2.nominal technique 3.electronic meetings 4.delphi technique |
|
group behavior model
|
external conditions--recourcs---processes---peformance
|
|
group effectivness
|
basse compensation on what the group does. give group money and let them split it up
|
|
communication
|
transfer and understanding of meaning
|
|
transfer
|
message was recieved in a form that can be interpreted by the reciever
|
|
interpersonal comm.
|
comm. b/t 2 or more people
|
|
org. comm.
|
all the patterns, networks and systems of comm.'s w/ in a org.
|
|
4 functions of comm.
|
1.control
2.info. 3.motivation 4.emotional expression |
|
channel
|
medium selected by teh sender through which the message travels to the reciever
|
|
formal channels
|
established by the org. and transmit messages that are related to the professional activies of members
|
|
informal channels
|
transmit personal or social messages in the org. these are spontaneous and emerge as a response in individ choice
|
|
directions of comm.
|
upward,downward,lateral
|
|
common formal small group netoworks
|
-chain
-wheel -all channel |
|
rumors result from
|
uncertainity and ambiguos situations
|
|
low and high richness
|
high-face to face
low-email |
|
poltically correct comm.
|
certain words that sterotype, intimidate and insult individs. we dont know what the new words mean(phyciall challenged..wheelchair)
|
|
high contexyt cultures
|
cultures that rely heavily on non-vermal cues
|
|
low-context cultures
|
cultures that rely realy heavily on words to convey meaning in comm.
|
|
active listening
|
-dont overtalk
-be empathetic -make eye contact -head nods -question |
|
managers
|
appointed and have formal authority
|
|
leaders
|
can influence others to achieve goal
|
|
trait theory
|
leaders born not made...consider personality, social, physical
|
|
behavioral theory
|
leadership can be taught
|
|
contingency/situational thoery
|
leadership effectivness depends on the situation
|
|
iniating structure
|
defining, stucturing the task. leader structures roles of subordinates
|
|
consideration(ohio)
|
extent to which a leader is less likely to have job reltionships characterized by mutual trust, respect for subordiantes ideas
|
|
employee-oriened leader(mich)
|
emphasizing interpersonal relations, taking a personal interest in the needs of employees and accepting individ differences
|
|
production oriented leader(mich)
|
emphasizes task aspects of the job
|
|
ohio and mich in general
|
leaders can be trained and developed. cant generalize every situation
|
|
fielder model
|
match situation to particual leadership style leaders style of interacting and degree to which the situation allows the leaders to control influence
|
|
fielder model continued
|
-leaders dont readily change style
-match leader to situation or change situation to leader |
|
least preferred co-worker
|
way in which a leader will evaluate least preferred co-worker...task or realtionship oriented
|
|
leader member relations
|
degre of confidence, trust, and respect subordiantes have in their leader
|
|
task structure
|
degree to which job assignments are procedurized
|
|
position power
|
formal structure in org..power to hire, fire, etc
|
|
cognitive resource theory
|
expericence helps in stressful situations. intelligence contributes in only stress free conditons using normal problem solving behaviors
|
|
contingency approach:hersey blanchard
|
assumes leader can change their behavior. have to have ability and willingness
|
|
situational leadership theory
|
focues on follwer readiness. more ready the followers(wiling and able) less need for supervision
|
|
path goal theory
|
leader must help followers attaining goals and reduce roadblocks to success. leader must change beahvior to fit situation
|
|
leader role path goal theory
|
-increase valence
-remove barriers -increase reward valence |
|
leader-member exchange theory
|
(treating everyone fairly)select certain followers to be in and exhange....subordiantes have higher peformance ratings, less turnover
|
|
leader participation model
|
leaderhip thoery that provides a set of rules to determine the form and amount of paticpative decesion making in different situations
|
|
transactional
|
leaders who guide or motivate their followers in the directino of established goals by clarifying role and task requirements
|
|
transformational-4 I's
|
1.idealized influence-vision and sense of mission
2.inspiratinoal-high expectations 3.intellectual-promote intelligence 4.individual consideration-personal attention to each individual |
|
charasmatic leadership theory
|
follwers make attributes of heroic or extraordinary leadership abilities when they observe certain behaviors
|
|
authentic leaders
|
know who they are and waht they believe in
|
|
ethical leaders
|
use ethical means to get followers to achieve goals
|
|
attribution theory
|
leadership is merely an attribution taht people amke about other individuals(ceo is not realy cause of stock price)
|
|
substitutes for leadership
|
expereince of wokers espcially in ambiguous jobs
|
|
power
|
capacity that A has the power to influcne the behavior of B
|
|
dependency
|
b's relationship to a when a possesses something that b requires
|
|
legimate authority
|
power a leader has is result of their postion
|
|
coercive power
|
power the leader has to punish or control
|
|
reward power
|
power to give positive benefits or rewards
|
|
expert power
|
influence a leader can exert as a result of expertise or skills
|
|
referent power
|
power from persons desirable traits or personal resources
|
|
power tactics by direction
|
up, down, lateral
|
|
responses to influnece
|
compliance is the most important
|
|
coalition
|
collecton of individs who come together to achive purpose
|
|
perceptions of poltics in org
|
decrease job satisfaction
increase axiety increase turnover decrease performance |
|
impression maganement
|
individuals attempt to control the impression others form of them
|
|
conflict
|
when one persons perception that there about to feel a negative impact...its is a process with steps
|
|
human realtions view of conflict
|
conflict is natural outcome
|
|
interactionist view of conflict
|
conflict is positive
|
|
functional conflict
|
conflict supports the goals of the group and improves its performance
|
|
dysfunctional conflict
|
hinders group performance
|
|
percieved conflict
|
aware that conflict conditoins may arise
|
|
felt conflict
|
emtional involvement in a conflict creating anxiety, tensess
|
|
conflict process handout
|
1.potential opposition
2.cogniton 3.intentions 4.behavior 5.outcomes |
|
functional conflict
|
reward dissent and punish conflict avioders
|
|
BATNA
|
best alternative to a negotiated agrement...lowest accptable outcome
|
|
vroom model
|
deals with subordiantes
|