Objections:

Front 1

INCOMPETENT

Back 1

this objection challenges the competnecy of the person who said what is being objected to

Front 2

IRRELEVANT

Back 2

THIS CLAIMS THAT WHAT WAS SAID IS NOT RELATED TO THE CASE OR DISCOVERABLE MATERIAL

Front 3

IMMATERIAL

Back 3

THIS CLAIMS THAT WHAT WAS SAID IS NOT GERMANE OR IMPORTANT TO THE CASE

Front 4

LEADING AND SUGGETIVE

Back 4

CLAIMING THE ATTORNEY IS ENCOURAGING THE WITNESS TO ANSWER IN A CERTAIN WAY OR SUGGESTING AN ANSWER TO THE WITNESS

Front 5

HEARSAY

Back 5

CLAIMING THE WITNESS IS SIMPLY RELATING WHAT OTHERS HAVE TOLD THE WITNESS OR WHAT HE OR SHE HEARD OTHERS SAY

Front 6

ARGUMENTATIVE/BADGERING THE WITNESS

Back 6

CLAIMING THAT THE QUESTION POSED BY THE ATTORNEY IS PROVOKING AN ARGUMENT WITH THE WITNESS, EVIDENCED BY QUESTIONS THAT BEGIN WITH WY AND ANSWERS THAT BEGIN WITH BECAUSE, OR DEMEANING THE WITNESS

Front 7

COMPOUND AND COMPLEX

Back 7

CLAIMING THAT THE QUESTION, AS POSED, IS ASKING MULTIPLE QUESTIONS THAT REQUIRE MULTIPLE ANSWERS WITHIN ONE QUESTION AND/OR IS CONFUSING

Front 8

VAGUE AND AMBIGUOUS

Back 8

CLAIMING THAT THE QUESTIN ASKED REQUIRES CLARIFICATION OR MAY BE TAKEN TWO WAYS AND SHOULD BE REPHRASED

Front 9

WITHOUT PROPER FOUNDATION

Back 9

CLAIMING THAT THE EXAMINING ATTORNE IS ASSUMING FACTS NOT IN EVIDENCE AND MUST FIRST LAY THE GROUNDWORK FOR THE QUESTION BEFORE ASKING IT

Front 10

PRIVILEGED

Back 10

CLAIMING THAT THE QUESTION WOULD LEAD TO AN ANSWER THAT SHOULD NOT BE ON THE RECORD AND IS PROTECTED BY LEGAL PRIVILEGES, SUCH AS THE ATTORNEY WORK-PRODUCT PRIVILEGE AND THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE, OR PRIVILEGES PROTECTING CERTAIN PROFESSIONALS AND THEIR PATIENTS

Front 11

ASKED AND ANSWERED

Back 11

CLAIMING THT THE QUESTION WAS ALREADY ASKED OF THE WITNESS AND ANSWERED

Front 12

NONRESPONSIVE TO THE QUESTION

Back 12

CLAIMING THAT THE WITNESS'S RESPONSE IS BEYOND THE SCOPE OF THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY THE QUESTION

Front 13

NOT THE BEST EVIDENCE

Back 13

CLAIMING THAT AN EXHIBIT'S MARKING IS NOT THE BEST TOOL TO SUPPORT THE ATTORNEY'S QUESTIONING/CASE OR THAT A QUESTION POSED WOULD BE BETTER ASKED OF A WITNESS MORE KNOWLEDGEABLE OF THE FACTS

Front 14

THE EVIDENCE SPEAKS FOR ITSELF

Back 14

CLAIMING THE WITNESS DOES NOT HAVE TO ANSWER THE QUESTION POSED AS THE ANSWER IS FOUND WITHIN THE EVIDENCE ALREADY PREENTED IN THE CASE

Front 15

BEYOND THE SCOPE

Back 15

CLAIMING THAT THE QUESTION ASKED EXCEEDS THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PROCEEDING AS SET FORTH BY cOURT oRDER o rULES OF dISCOVERY

Front 16

SELF-SERVING

Back 16

CLAIMING THAT THE WITNESS IS PROTECTED BY THE fIFTH aMENDMENT AND SHOULD NOT ANSWER THE QUESTIN AS THE ANSWER MAY LEAD TO FACTS IRRELEVANT TO THE CASE, THE DISCLOSURE OF WHICH MAY LEAD TO FURTHER LEGAL ACTION AGAINST THE WITNESS

Front 17

CALLS FOR A NARRATIVE

Back 17

CLAIMING THAT THE QUESTION CALLS FOR A LENGTHY, RAMBLING, STORYLIKE RESPONSE RATHER THAN A BRIEF, SPECIFIC ANSWER

Front 18

CALLS FOR OPINION EVIDENCE

Back 18

CLAIMING THAT THE QUESTION POSED BY THE EXAMINING ATTORNEY CALLS FOR OPINIONS FO THE WITNESS RATHER THAN FACTS

Front 19

CALLS FOR A CONCLUSION

Back 19

CLAIMING THAT THE QUESTION POSED BY THE EXAMINING ATTORNEY REQUIRES THE WITNESS TO CONCLUDE SOMETHING RATHER THAN STATE FACTS

Front 20

CALLS FOR EXPERT WITNESS TESTIMONY

Back 20

CLAIMING THAT THE WITNESS IS A LAYPERSON AND IS NOT QUALIFIED OR APPEARING IN A CAPACITY THAT WOULD ENABLE HIM OR HER TO RESPOND TO THE QUESTION POSED