• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/176

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

176 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Elements for crime
- mens rea
- actus reus
- causation
[note concurrent principle for larceny/burglary]
Form of actions (actus reus)
Commission
Omission
Commission for actus reus requires
Only the volitional act of D. Not sufficient:
- Pushed/grabbed
- Reflex/convulsion
- Sleepwalking
Ommission for actus reus requires
- Duty to act
- Ability to act
- Knowledge of the duty
Duty to act for criminal purposes arises out of
- Law
- Contract
- Status relationship
- Voluntary assumption of care that prevented help from others
- D created the dangerous situation in the first place
Common law mens rea (4)
Malice
Specific intent
General intent
Strict liability
Common law specific intent crimes
- Assault; D1-Murder
- Larceny, embezzlement, false-pretense, forgery, ROBBERY
- Burglary
- Solicitation, attempt, conspiracy
Common law malice crimes
Murder
Arson
Common law general intent crimes
battery
kidnapping
false imprisonment
sex assault
Common law strict liability crimes
Welfare crimes (selling to minor)
Statutory rape
Criminal cause in fact
But for cause
Acceleration of result
Criminal proximate cause
- Intervening factors would cut

- Eggshell victim would not cut
Common law accomplice elements
- Encourages and Aids
- Specific intent that crime be committed
- no defense to accomplice
Common law accomplice vicarious liability
- L for all crimes committed by principal aided or encouraged

- L for all foreseeable crimes committed by principal
Common law withdrawal defense for accomplice liability
- Encourages: discourages

- Aids: take substantial steps to prevent the crime from being committed
NY accomplice elements
- Aids or encourages the conduct
- Intends that the crime be committed
- No defense for accomplice
NY criminal facilitation
- Knowledge that crime be committed

- Aids or encourages the conduct
NY defense of withdrawal from accomplice liability
"Voluntary and complete" withdrawal
Both aids/encourages: take substantial step to prevent the crime from being committed
Defenses to accomplice
- Mere presence
- Mere knowledge (NY: facilitation)
- Victim of protected class
Common law solicitation
- asking, inciting, counseling or urging another to commit a crime
- Specific intent that the crime be committed

= Asking is the act targeted
Common law conspiracy elements
- Agreement (2 or more) to commit a crime
- Specific intent to agree
- Specific intent to accomplish the objective
- Overt act (preparatory is OK)
Common law vicarious liability for consiprator's crimes
- L for all crimes committed by co-conspirators in furtherance
- L for all foreseeable crimes committed by co-conspirators
Common law withdrawal from conspiracy
One cannot withdraw from "conspiracy."

- Still L for past crime committed by D and co-conspirators

- But no longer liable for crimes committed by other co-conspirators after withdrawal
NY withdrawal from conspiracy
It is an affirmative defense if:
- Withdrawal is due to change of heart
- Withdrawal is complete and voluntary (prevent the crime from happening)
Common law requirements for # of D for conspiracy
- Requires 2
- Wharton's rule: requires 1+ (# required by underlying crime) if # is 2 or more
NY law requirement for # of D for conspiracy
- Unilateral conspiracy is fine
- Wharton's rule
Common law and NY attempt (minority MBE)
- Specific intent a crime committed
- Dangerously close to completion
- Incomplete due to reason outside of control
MPC attempt (majority MBE)
- Intention a crime be committed
- Substantial step towards commission corroborative of intent (preparation insufficient)
- Incomplete for reason outside of control
MBE impossibility defense to attempt
- Legal impossibility (to commit the underlying crime) is defense
- Factual impossibility is not defense
NY impossibility defense to attempt
Neither legal impossibility nor factual impossibility is a defense
MBE merge of inchoate crimes
Merge: attempt, solicitation
Separate: conspiracy
NY merge of inchoate crimes
Merge: attempt
Separate: solicitation, conspiracy
Impossibility (of the underlying crime) defense to conspiracy
NEVER
NY vicarious liability for conspiracy
NO vicarious liability for crimes D does not participate in
Common law withdrawal defense to solicitation
NO
NY withdrawal defense to solicitation
NO
Common law withdrawal defense to attempt
NO (note abandonment)
NY withdrawal defense to attempt
No (note abandonment)
Defenses to crimes
- Incapacity (age, insanity, intoxication)
- Mistake
- Self-defense
- Duress
- Necessity
- Entrapment
Common law infancy defense for crime
- under 7: not liable
- 7-14: presumed not to be liable
- >14: prosecute as an adult
NY infancy defense for crime
- Under 13: not prosecute as an adult
- 13: only prosecute for 2nd degree murder
- 14/15: prosecute for serious crimes against person/property
- 16 and above: prosecute as an adult
Common law insanity (M'Naughten)
Due to mental disease or defect, D lacks the *ability* to:
- understand the nature and *quality* of the act
- appreciate the wrongfulness of the act
Common law insanity (Duham)
D's action is a product from mental disease or caused by mental disease (not used anywhere)
Common law insanity (volitional test)
Due to mental disease or defect, D lacks the *ability* to:
- control the actions
- conform the conduct with requirements of law
MPC insanity
Due to mental disease or defect, D lakcs *substantial ability* to:
- appreciate the *criminality* of the act
- conform the conduct with requirements of law
NY insanity test
Due to mental disease or defect, D lacks *substantial ability* to appreciate:
- the nature and *consequence* of the act
- the *wrongfulness* of the act
Common law voluntary intoxciation defense to crime
- Only available to specific intent crime
- Requires high level of intoxciation to negate the specific intent
NY intoxciation defense to crime
- Only if intoxication negates necessary mental status for a crime (intent/knowledge)
- requires high level of intoxciation
Criminal defenses/affirmative defenses burden of proof
- Defense: prosecution prove beyond reasonable doubt each element of crime and negate the defense
- Affirmative defense: D proves under POE to establish affirmative defenses
Common law mistake defense
Negates necessary mental status:
- Specific intent: any mistake
- General intent and malice: reasonable mistake

- Strict liability: mistake not a defense
NY mistake defense
Negates necessary mental status:
- Intentional, Knowing, Reckless: any mistake
- Criminal negligence: reasonable mistake

- Strict liability: no mistake defense
Mistake of law as defense
- Attempt to commit an act which is not a crime (mistakenly believes that it is a crime): defense to attempt

- Not a defense in general (mistakenly believe it is *not* a crime but in fact it *is* a crime)
Common law criminal self-defense
May use self-defense if victim reasonably believes that use of force is necessary to protect himself from immediate use of unlawful force against him.
- Simultaneous
- Proportional
- No retreat requirement
- First aggressor rule
- Reasonable mistake in defense
NY criminal self-defense
May use self-defense if victim reasonably believes that the use of force is necessary to prevent unlawful use of force against him.
- Simultaneous
- Proportional
- Retreat requirement
- First aggressor withdrawal requirement
- Reasonable mistake in defense
First aggressor rule in self-defense
First aggressor cannot use deadly force in self-defense.

- Common law exception: withdrawal *or* escalation

- NY exception: withdrawal *even if* escalation
NY rule of retreat in self-defense
- Must retreat before using deadly force
- No need to retreat if at dwelling (inside)
- No need to retreat if cannot retreat safely
- [No need to retreat for rape, kidnapping, burglary, robbery or arson]
- No duty to retreat for police
Use of force to prevent crime
- may use non-deadly force to prevent any crime

- may use deadly force only for felony risking human life
Use of force to arrest
- Deadly force can be used only if: D tries to escape; risking life or serious bodily harm to others
Self-defense against arrest
Common law: unlawful arrest
NY: no self-defense against arrest unless police uses excessive force
Mistake in criminal self-defense
- Reasonable mistake is defense

- Unreasonable mistake is not defense (NY and common law majority)

- Unreasonable mistake mitigates crime (MPC/minority)
Common law criminal duress defense
Duress:
- Forced to commit a crime
- Force of threat of force
- Death or serious bodily harm
- D or D's family
- Not a defense to homicide
NY criminal duress defense
Duress:
- Forced to commit a crime
- Force of threat of force
- Death or serious bodily harm
- D or D's family
- Defense to homicide
Common law criminal necessity defense
D reasonably believes that the crime committed is necessary to prevent a greater harm.

- Not a defense to homicide
NY criminal necessity defense
D reasonably believes that the crime committed is necessary to prevent a greater harm.

- It can be defense to homicide.
Criminal entrapment defense
- Government initiates the crime (sting)

- Proof that D has no predisposition of committing the crime.
NY Murder 1st Degree
D must be 18
Intentional killing

One of the aggravating factors:
Kill for hire
Kill a judge
Kill witness
2 or more victims
Kill officer on duty
Intentional kill during BRAKES
NY Murder in 2nd Degree
- Intentional killing

- Reckless killing with depraved heart

- Felony murder (killing is unintentional)
NY Manslaughter 1st Degree
- Intentional killing with EED defense

- Intentional infliction of serious bodily harm resulting in death
NY Manslaugther 2nd Degree
- Normal reckless killing
NY Criminally Negligent Homicide
- Criminally negligent
- Killing another
Common law murder
Killing another with malicious aforethought

Malice:
- Intent to kill
- Intent to inflict serious bodily harm
- Reckless with depraved heart
- Intent to commit dangerous felony
Common law 1st Degree murder
In many states:
- Premeditated or deliberate murder
- Felony murder with serious underlying crimes
Common law voluntary manslaughter
Murder with heat of passion after adequate provocation
- Provocation is reasonable
- Actually provoked
- No time to cool off
- Actually not cooled off
Common law involuntary manslaughter
Criminally negligent manslaughter
Misdemeanor manslaughter
Common law battery (crime)
- General intent
- Unlawful application of force
- Causes injury or offense
Common law assault (crime)
- Specific intent

- attempted battery
*OR*
- creating apprehension (fear)
- immediate battery
- actual apprehension (fear)
NY assault (crime) 1st degree
- Intent
- Unlawful application of physical force
- causes *serious* injury
- with weapon
NY assault (crime) 2nd degree
- Intent
- Unlawful application of physical force
- causes *serious* injury
- NO weapon
NY assault (crime) 3rd degree
- Intent
- Unlawful application of physical force
- causes *injury*
Common law false imprisonment (crime)
- General intent
- Confining another
- Without consent
NY False Imprisonment 2nd Degree
- Knowing restrain is unlawful
- Confining another
- Without consent
NY False Imprisonment 1st Degree
- Knowing consent is unlawful
- Confining another
- Without consent
- Risks of causing serious bodily injury
Common law kidnapping
- General intent
- Confining another
- Without consent
- Moving or concealing victim
NY kidnapping 2nd Degree
- Intent or knowledge
- Abducting another
NY kidnapping 1st Degree
- Intent or knowledge
- Abducting another

One of three aggravating factors:
- For ransom
- For > 12 hours, to rape, injure or rob
- Cause death of victim
Common law and NY rape
- General intent
- Sexual intercourse
- Without consent
- Force, threat of force, or unconscious victim
Common law statutory rape
- Strict liability
- Sexual intercourse
- Victim under age of consent

[MPC/minority: reasonable mistake is defense]
NY statutory rape
- Strict liability
- Sexual intercourse
- Victim under 17
- D over 21
Common law larceny
- Trespassory (wrongful)

- Taking; personal property; of another

- Specific intent to retain permanent possession

Note:

- Another must have lawful custody

- Later changed intent to retain: concurrent doctrine

- No claim of right
Common law embezzlement
- Taking; personal property; of another

- Specific intent to defraud

- Within D's discretionary power and possession
Common law false-pretense
- Obtain *title* of property
- Through intentional false statement
- Specific intent to defraud

False statement must be about past/current facts; not about future.

[Writing check knowing no account]
Common law forgery
- Write or alter an instrument
- So that it is false
- Specific intent to defraud
NY larceny (with degrees)
Including common law larceny, false pretense, embezzlement and larceny by trick.

1st Degree: 1 million
2nd Degree: 50,000
3rd Degree: 3,000
4th Degree: 1,000
Petit larceny: <1,000
Common law robbery
- Larceny (take property from another)
- In the physical presence of victim
- Force or threat of force
- Specific intent to steal

Note:
Threat of embarassment: blackmail
Threat of future injury: extortion
NY robbery 3nd Degree
Forcible stealing:
- Tresspassory take
- Personal property of another
- Force
NY Robbery 2nd Degree
Forcible stealing:
- Tresspassory take
- Personal property of another
- Force

Plus:
- Presence of another in aid
- Stolen a car
- Causing injury
NY robbery 1st Degree
Forcible stealing:
- Tresspassory take
- Personal property of another
- Force

Plus:
- Causing *serious* injury
- With weapon
Common law arson
- Burning of building
- Malicious

Not required anymore: dwelling; "of another"

Charring is sufficient (previously requires some pieces of building to burn)

Must burn the building itself
NY Arson 4th Degree
Reckless burning of building
NY Arson 3rd Degree
Intentional burning of building
NY Arson 2nd Degree
- Intentional burning of building

- D knew or should have known there is person inside
NY Arson 1st Degree
- Intentional burning of building

- D knew or should have known there is person inside

- Using explosive or incendiary device
Common law burglary
- Break
- Entry
- Dwelling
- At night
- Specific intent to commit felony

Now: at night; break; felony; dwelling; etc are removed or modified
NY Burglary 3rd Degree
- Enter or remain
- In a building
- With intent to commit crime
NY Burglary 2nd Degree
- Enter or remain
- In a building
- With intent to commit crime

1 of 3 factors:
- Dwelling
- Causing serious injury
- Weapon
NY Burglary 1st Degree
- Enter or remain
- In a building
- With intent to commit crime
- D knows the building to be dwelling

1 of 2 factors:
- Causing serious injury
- Weapon
NY menacing
Attempted assault in NY (specific intent to assault)
A year and a day rule
Death must result within 1 year and a day (historically) for homicide

Abolished now
Common law felony murder
- Commission of felony (convicted)
- Felony is inherently dangerous
- Felony is unrelated to murder
- A non-felon is killed
- During crime or immediate flight
- Killing is foreseeable

[Flight: ends at 1st temporary safe house]
[Co-felon killed: not felony murder]
NY Felony Murder
- Commission of BRAKES
- No need of conviction; sufficient evidence for commission is good
- Intentional or unintentional killing
- Non-felon is killed
- During crime or in immediate flight
- Killing is foreseeable
- Non-slayer rule N/A

BRAKES:
Burglary
Robbery
Arson
Kidnapping
Escape
Sexual assault
NY Non-slayer rule
Defense of felony murder
- Not the person who kills
- Not bringing a weapon

- No reason to know a co-felon brought weapon

- No reason to expect use of force that could kill
NY "Aggravated Homicide"
Any homicide with aggravating factor:

- Kill office in line of duty

- Kill child under 14, D > 18, in cruel and wanton manner
Common law possession crimes
Possession
- Actual possession
- Dominion or control (constructive)
NY Possession Crimes
- Controlled substance
- Weapon (loaded and operable)
- Stolen property
Search and Seizure (elements)
- 4th Amendment applies
- Search with warrant
- Search without warrant
- Admissibility of evidence obtained in unconstitutional search and seizure
Elements to apply 4th Amendment to Search and Seizure
- Government Agent
- Reasoanble expectation of privacy
Government Agent for 4th Amendment
- Publicly paid police
- Private citizens under the direction of police
- Private police deputized with power to arrest
- Public school principals
Places expressly within 4th Amendment for expectation of privacy
Person, effect, papers, and house (including curtilage)
Places with no expectation of privacy for 4th Amendment search and seizure
voice, handwriting
account record
open fields, view from air
garbage, odor
paint scrap
Standards for reasonable expectation of privacy for 4th amendment search and seizure
Subjectively, actual expectation
Objectively, reasonable expectation
Standing to challenge for 4th Amendment Search and Seizure
D's own constitutional rights must be impaired.
- D is owner, tenant of house
- D, guest, re area D has access
- D, owner of item, has reasonale expectation

Note:
- Temporary guests for business purpose has no expectation and no standing

- NY: Driver/passenger has standing if possession of weapon is attributed to them
Valid warrant search under 4th Amendment: elements
- Warrant is valid
- MBE: Good faith if warrant is invalid
- Execution complies with warrant
Valid search warrant requirement
- Probable cause
- Particularity
- Neutral and detached magistrate
Probable cause for search warrant
There must be a fair probability that contraband would be found in the searched area under the totality of circumstances (POE)
Affidavit requirement for MBE search warrant
- Hearsay is fine

- Affidavit must provide sufficient corroborative evidence for the magistrate to make a "common sense practical determination" of probable cause
Affidavit requirement for NY search warrant
Affidavit must show:
- Basis for the information
- Veracity and reliaiblity of informant
Particularity for search warrant
- Specify the area to be searched
- Specify the item to be seized
Wiretap (surveilance) warrant
Affidavit must show, in particular:
- Crime
- Conversation
- Persons to the conversation
- Time limit
Other party agreed to wiretap
D assumes the risk that other party may agree; no violation of D's 4th Amendment rights.
MBE Good Faith saving invalid search warrant
If the police obtained the warrant in good faith, it may still use.

Not good faith:
- Eggregious lacking probable cause
- No particularity (reasonable officer can't rely)
- Knowing or reckless misrep of facts
- Biased magistrate
Valid execution of warrant
- Compliance with terms
- Knock and announce

No need to knock & announce if:
- futile
- dangerous
- hindering investigation

Even if no knock and annonce, evidence still admissible.
Warrantless search & seizure permitted: situations
Exigent circumstances
Search incidental to arrest
Consent
Automobile search
Plain view
Inventory
Special needs
Terry stops and frisks
Exigent circumstances exception for search warrant
- Evanascent evidence
- Hot pursuit (enter house; seizure)
- Emergency aid
Search incidental to arrest exception for search warrant
- Arrest must be lawful
- Search for weapon or preserve evidence related to arrested crime
- Contaporaneous with arrested crime
Scope of search for search incidental to arrest
MBE: Wingspan (person, cloth, effect, container within arrestee's immediate control)

NY: cannot search container unless suspect to be armed
Search vehicle incidental to arrest exception to warrant
MBE
- Unsecured: cabin (not trunk) including container
- Secured: no search unless reason to believe that there is evidence relating to arrested crime

NY: once out of car, cannot search car for evidence

* See other potential automobile search exceptions
Consent exception to warantless search
- Voluntary and intelligent
- Apparent consent (reasonable belief)
- Co-tenants: objector wins
- Scope of consent: reasonable belief
5th Amendment Miranda (violation)
Violated if:

- Custody: atmosphere suggesting not free to leave

- Interrogation: known or should have known as likely to lead to confession

- No waiver

- Not for public safety questioning
- Not for spontaneous blurt out confessions
- Only for testimonial evidence (confession/lie detector), not for physical evidence
5th Amendment Miranda (content)
- Right to silence
- Used against D in court
- Right to counsel
- Appoint on for free if can't afford
5th Amendment Miranda (waiver)
- Knowing
- Intelligent
- Voluntary

- May be express (signed writing)
- May be implied (e.g. cooperating)

NY: if kept child from parent, waiver invalid
5th Amendment Miranda (invoke)
- Express invoke for right to silence
- Unambiguous for right to counsel
5th Amendment Miranda (result of invocation)
Once you say: I want a lawyer

Police must scrupulously honor:
- Stop questioning
- May not re-initiate

Reinitiate:
- By defendant
- By police, 14 days after release, obtain a valid waiver
Pretrial identification (5th Miranda)
NO Miranda right to counsel for line-up, show-up or photo-array
(Miranda is for testimony)
Pretrial identification (6th Amendment)
MBE:
Line-up: after charge
Show-up: after charge
Photo-array: No

NY: indelible right to counsel.
Line-up/show-up pre-charge if:
- D is aware he has counsel
- D requests counsel
Pretrial identification (Due Process)
Unconstitutional if so suggestive that there is substantial likelihood for misidentification.
Pretrial identification (remedy)
Remedy: no in-court identification

Exception: prosecution prove:
- Specificity of identification
- Certainty of identification
- Ample opportunity to observe

(Usually only violation to right to counsel; but not due process for suggestiveness)
MBE Grand Jury
- Functions: issue indictment
- Secretive
- Not required under constitution

No Miranda right or right to counsel
Detention hearing not required if
- Grand Jury indicted
- Arrest warrant issued

(Detention hearing is to determine probable cause to take D into custody)
After arrest, D must be brought before a magistrate to
- Advise D of his right
- Set bail
- Appoint a counsel, if necessary
NY Grand Jury
Grand Jury indictment required.

Sufficient evidence to establish:
- All elements of crime
- Reasonable cause to believe that defendant committed the crime

D may request to testify
Defendant's trial right
- Prosecutor must disclose all exculpatory evidence
- Unbiased judge (no financial stake; no actual prejudice)
Criminal right to jury
Right to jury trial for offenses > 6 months.

- Jury trial (6-unanimous;12-no need to be unanimous)

NY: Jury: 12/11; unanimous

- Pool of cross-section of community
- 3 peremptive strikes not racial or gender based
Criminal ineffective assistance of counsel
- Deficency
- But for deficiency, D would win

It requires colorable argument that D is not guilty. Difficult to meet.
Plea bargain (requirement)
Judge must inform D (on record):
- Nature of charges
- Consequence of plea bargain

D must agree knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily.
Withdrawal of plea bargain after sentencing (requirements)
- Involuntary bargain
- Ineffective assistance of counsel
- Prosecution breach bargain
- Jurisdictional defect
Punishment (8th Amendment)
Cruel and unusual punishmet prohibited.

Death penalty violates if:
- categorically automatic death sentence
- on mentally retarded D
- execution when D is insane
- D was under 18 at commission

Jury must be able to consider all mitigating evidence
Double Jeopardy (attach)
- Jury trial: 1st juror swears in
- Bench trial: 1st witness swears in
- Plea bargain: unconditionally enters

No double jeopardy for same crime in same sovereign
Double jeopardy (double)
MBE: not if each crime has a different element from the other

NY: transactional. Not double if:
- Substantially different elements
- 1 different element AND for different harms
- Different crimes for different victims
- One possession and one use
Double jeopardy (second trial requirement)
- Hung jury
- Mistrial for manefest necessity (e.g. defect in indictment)
- D successfully appeals (other than insufficient evidence)
- Defendant did not hold bargain
Take the 5th
One may refuse to testify under oath

NY Except: Grand Jury
Exception: immunity granted
Exception: statutory limitation passed

Waiver
Once testify, forever waives taking 5th
Defendant takes the stand
Take the 5th (immunity)
MBE: grand immunity to use testimony against witness for same crime - may not take 5th

NY: grant immunity for the transaction
5th Amendment (Prosecutor conduct)
Prosecutor may not allude to:
- Defendant invoking right to silence
- Defendant invoking right to counsel
- Defendnat decides not to testify
Automobile search exception under 4th Amendment
- Probable cause that contraband or evidence of crime can be found on the car
- Can search anywhere in the car including trunks (container, package, and luggage)

Search after traffic stops:
- Must have probable cause prior to initiate search
Plain view exception to 4th Amendment search and seizure
- lawful access to the area searched
- lawful access to the item searched
- the item must be plainly recognizable as contraband or evidence of crime

* NY: for obscene materials, search warrant is required even if in plain view
Inventory exception for 4th Amendment search and seizure
- Upon booking into incarceration
- Upon impounding of vehicles

Requirements:
- State must have relevant regulations that are reasonable (considered in the totality)
- Police must follow the requirements of the regulations
Special needs exception to 4th Amendment search and seizure
Special needs must not be general interest in law enforcement

- Random drug testing (for customs officers handling drug interdiction; railroad employees after accident; public school children participate in any extracaricular activities)
- Public school principal may search to enforce school rules (not unreasonably offensive)
- Government employees' desks may be searched for work-related misconduct

- No 4th Amendment right at border (may search if reasonable suspicion)
4th Amendment right at border
None
Terry Stops and Frisks
Terry stops: stop (seize) suspected individuals to investigate
Terry frisks: search individuals only to protect officer safety

- Only exception not requiring probable cause
- reasonable suspicion of criminal activity or armed is sufficient (i.e. specific, articulable reasons)
Terry Stops
- seized if reasonable belief of: (a) no freedom to leave; and (b) no freedom to refuse questioning

- Hot pursuit MBE: seized if: (a) physically restraining suspect or (b) submit to police
- Hot pursuit NY: seizure in itself

- Seize cars: drivers and passengers are seized

* dog sniffs are not seizure if not substantially proloning the traffic stop
Terry Frisks
Officer may pad the suspect for weapon
MBE: officer may seize:
- Weapons
- Contraband or evidence if recognize without physical manipulation

NY: officer may seize
- Weapons
- Contraband or evidence only if thought it is a weapon

Car frisks: may search car for weapons (no locked containers)

Protective sweeps for criminal confederates
- Adjacent area: reasonable suspicion
- Remote area: reasonable prudent officer could conclude that confederates are there
Crim Pro Arrest requirement
Arrest: place into custody for prosecution or interrogation; call to police station for fingerprinting

- Probable cause
- Can arrest for any offense even if only punishable by civil fines

- requires an arrest warrant if suspect is at home and no emergency
- requires an arrest warrant and a search warrant if suspect is in a 3-party home

- may arrest without warrant if on public property

if suspecting common enterprises among driver/passenger, may arrest all
Crim Pro confessions applicable law
- 14th amendment due process
- 5th amendment Miranda rights
- 6th amendment right to councel
Confessions (14th Amendment)
- confessions must be voluntary
- there must not be any police coersion
Confessions (6th Amendment) - MBE
- it starts only after formal charges are made
- it applies only to the specific crime charged (not relating to other crimes)

Confession obtained violates right to counsel if:
- No knowing, intelligent and voluntary waiver is made
- Deliberately solicited by the police
Confessions (6th Amendment) - NY
It arises if:
- Significant judicial process starts (arraignment; formal charge; etc)
- Procedures overbearing defendant's free will starts (police want to overwhelm D)
- Presence of counsel is beneficial to defendant

* if released, and later taken into custody for unrelated crime, not automatically attach to that

Scope:
- it applies to all confessions, including other crimes not charged
- deliberately solicited by the police

Waiver:
- Knowing, intelligent, and voluntary requirement
- Indelible right to counsel requires counsel presence if one is appointed
Use of evidence obtained in violation of constitution (Crim Pro)
Police's deliberate, reckless or gross negligent violation:
- Prosecution case-in-chief: inadmissible
- Impeachment of D's testimony if D takes stand: admissible
- Miranda violation against 3rd party: inadmissible

Exceptions:
- If only violating knock and annonce: admissible
- If police makes reasonble mistake: admissible

Fruit of poisonous tree: subsequent evidence also inadmissible.
Evidence is inadmissible if discovered due to prior inadmissible evidence

Exception to poisonous tree:
Physical evidence discovered by Miranda-violated confession: admissible
Prosecution proves break of the chain:
- Independent source
- Inevitable discovery
- Defendant regains free-will (second try for Miranda right violation to obtain same evidence if the first one is not coercive)