Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
124 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
What are the four questions that must be answered in order for the 4th Amendment to apply? |
1) Was the search or seizure executed by a government agent? 2) Was the search or seizure of an area or item protected by the 4th Amendment? 3) Did a gov't agent either physically inturde a protected area or item to obtain information; or violate an individual's reasonable expectation of privacy? 4) Did the individual subjected to the search or seizure have standing to challenge? |
|
What are the categories for government agents under the 4th amendment? |
1) Publically paid police officer, on or off duty 2) Private citizens if, and only if, they are acting at the direction of police 3) Private security guards, but only if deputized with power to arrest 4) Public school administrators |
|
The 4th amendment expressly protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures of their: |
1) Persons 2) Houses 3) Papers 4) Effects |
|
Curtilage |
an area adjacent to the home to which the activity of home life extends |
|
What are categories of items that are not covered by the 4th amendment? |
Physical characteristics, Odors, Garbage, Open fields, Financial Records, Airspace, Pen Registers |
|
What are the two ways in which searches or seizures can implicate an individual's 4th Amendment rights? |
1) Trespass based test 2) Privacy based test |
|
Trespass based test |
The agent physically intruded on a constitutionally protected area in order to obtain information. |
|
Privacy based test |
The agent's search of seizure of a constitutionally protected area violated an individual's reasonable expectation of privacy. |
|
What must an individual show in order to satisfy the privacy-based test? |
1) An actual and subjective expectation of privacy in the area searched or items seized; and 2) that the privacy expectation was "one that society recognizes as reasonable." |
|
What is the key principle for 4th Amendment standing? |
An individual's personal privacy rights must be invaded, not those of a 3rd party. |
|
In New York, can passengers in cars challenge the possession of weapons, if possession is attributed to them? |
Yes |
|
What are the four key questions that must be answered when analyzing a search or seizure conducted pursuant to a search warrant? |
1) Was the warrant issued by a neutral and detached magistrate? 2) Is the warrant supported by probable cause and particularity? 3) If not, did police officers rely on a defective warrant in "good faith?" 4) Was the wrrant propery executed by the police? |
|
What is the standard for analyzing a neutral and detached magistrate? |
Ceases to be neutral and detached when his/her conduct demonstrates bias in favor of the prosecution |
|
What is required for probable cause? |
Proof of a "fair probability" |
|
Is hearsay admissible for obtaining warrants? |
Yes |
|
At common law what is required for use of an informant's tip to get a warrant supported by probable cause? |
The sufficiency of the informant's tip rests on corroboration by the police of enough of the tipster's information to allow the magistrate to make a "common sense practical" determination that PC exists based on a totality of the circumstances. |
|
In new york what is required for PC based on an informant's tip? |
Government must establish: 1) informant's reliability or veracity and 2) his or her basis of knowledge
When informant has not revealed his/her basis of knowledge PC may be established by police observation which confirms sufficient detail suggestive of the criminal activity in question |
|
What must the warrant state in order to be sufficiently particular? |
It must state: 1) the place to be searched; and 2) the items to be seized |
|
Is there a good faith exception in NY? |
No |
|
What is the common law good faith exception? |
An officer's good faith reliance overcomes consitutional deficits in probable cause and particularity. |
|
What are the 4 categorical exceptions to the common law good faith exception? |
1) The affidavit supporting the warrant application is so egregiously lacking probable cause that no reasonable officer would have relied on it. 2) The warrant is so facially deficient in particularity that officers could not reasonably presume it to be valid. 3) The affidavit relied upon by the magistrate contains knowing or reckless falsehoods that are necessary to the probable cause finding. 4) The magistrate who issued the warrant is biased in favor of prosecution. |
|
What two aspects must be considered when determining if a warrant was properly executed? |
1) Compliance with the warrant's terms and limitations. 2) Knock and announce rule |
|
When can an officer disregard the knock and announce rule? |
When the officer reasonably believes that knock and announce would be: a) Futile, or b) dangerous, or c) would hinder the investigation |
|
Who may officers detain when executing a search warrant? |
Occupants found within or immediately outside the residence |
|
What are the eight exceptions to the warrant requirement? |
Exigent circumstances Search incident to arrest Consent Automobile Plain View Inventory Terry "Stop and Frisk" |
|
What are the three types of exigent circumstances? |
1) Evanescent Evidence 2) "Hot Pursuit" of a Fleeing Felon 3) "Emergency Aid" Exception |
|
What is evanexcent evidence? |
Evidence that would dissipate or disappear in the time it would take to get a warrant
Ex. tissue under a suspect's fingernails |
|
Explain the "Hot Pursuit" Exception |
1) Allows police officers to enter a home of a suspect or a third party to search for a fleeing felon
2) any evidence of a crime discovered in plain view during search for the suspect is admissible |
|
Explain "Emergency Aid" Exception |
Police may enter a residence without a warrant when there is an objectively reasonable basis for believing that a person inside is in need of emergency aid to address of prevent injury |
|
Explain the search incident to arrest exception |
The police may search the body, clothes and any containers within the wingspan of a lawfully arrested person contemperaneous in time and place with the arrest |
|
What is the new york distinction regarding search incident to arrest? |
To search containers within wingspan, an officer must suspect that the arrestee is armed |
|
What is the rule regarding searching an automobile incident to arrest? |
1) Police may search the car of an unsecured individual that is under arrest for any evidence, but not the trunk
2) Police may not search the car of a secured person incident to arrest unless they have reason to believe that the car will have evidence of the crime for which the person was arrested |
|
What is the New York distinction regarding search of a vehicle incident to arrest? |
Once the occupant is out of the car the police may not search containers inside the car |
|
In order for consent to be valid what must be true? |
Consent must have been voluntary and intelligent |
|
Do police officers have to tell someone that they have the right not to consent in order for consent to be valid? |
No |
|
What is the scope of consent? |
Consent to search extends to all areas for which a reasonable officer would believe permission to search was granted. |
|
If a person does not have the actual authority to consent but grants consent anyway what happens? |
Officer may search if it was reasonable for the officer to think that the person had the actual authority. |
|
Who can consent to a search of common areas in a shared residence? |
Any resident |
|
If two tenants are present and one objects and one consents, what happens? |
The objecting party's wishes controls |
|
What is the automobile exception? |
Police may search the entire vehicle including containers is they have probable cause to believe that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in the vehicle |
|
Does an officer need probable cause to stop a car? |
No |
|
What are the three requirements for a plain view search? |
1) Lawful access to the place from which the item can be plainly seen, 2) Lawful access to the item itself, and 3) the criminality of the item must be immediately apparent |
|
What are the tenets of a inventory search? |
1) The regulation governing them are reasonable in scope; 2) The search itself complies with those regualtions; and 3) the search is conducted in good faith ; that is, it is motivated solely by the need to safeguard the owner's possessions and/or to ensure officer safety |
|
What is a Terry stop? |
It is a brief detention or seizure for the purposes of investigating suspicious conduct |
|
When is a person seized for 4th amendment purposes? |
When, based on a totality of the circumstances, a reasonable person would not feel free to leave or to decline an officer's request to answer questions. |
|
What shoudl you consider when determining if someone has been seized? |
1) Whether officer brandishes a weapon 2) the officer's tone and demeanor 3) Whether the individual was told she had the right to refuse consent |
|
During a police pursuit when is a person seized? |
When the individual submits to the officer's authority or if the officer physically restrains him |
|
In new york when is a person seized during a police pursuit? |
The pursuit is a seizure in and of itself |
|
Who is seized during a car stop |
Driver and passengers |
|
May an officer ask a person to get out of the car during a traffic stop? |
Yes, at his/her discretion |
|
When are dog sniffs allowed during a traffic stop? |
Permissible as long as the sniff does not prolong the stop unreasonably |
|
What is a terry frisk? |
A pat down of the body and outer clothing for weapons that is justified by an officer's belief that a suspect is armed and dangerous. |
|
When can an officer seize during a terry frisk? |
1) Somthing that an officer reasonably believes to be a weapon 2) Something an officer immediately recognizes as contraband without manipulating it |
|
What can be seized in a Terry frisk in NY? |
Only things that reasonably appear to be a weapon |
|
What is a car frisk? |
When conducting a traffic stop, if an officer believes that a suspect is dangerous, he may search the passenger cabin of the suspect's vehicel limited to those areas in which a weapon may be placed or hidden |
|
What is a protective sweep? |
When making an in-home arrest and oficer may sweep the residence to look for criminal confederates of the arrestee whose presence may threaten officer safety |
|
What evidentiary standard applies to terry stops and frisk |
Reasonable articulable suspicion |
|
Can informant's tips be used to satisfy the terry reasonable articulable suspicion standard? |
Yes, provided the tip contains sufficient predictive information corroborated by the police |
|
What are the categories for special needs searches |
a) Drug testing (railroad employees after accident, customs agents responsible for drug interdiction, public school children participating in extracurriculars) b) Parolees as condition of parole c) School searches d) Border searches e) "Non-law enforcement primary purpose" test |
|
Exclusionary rule |
Evidence that is obtained in violation of federal statutory or constitutional provision is inadmissible in court against the individual whose rights were violated |
|
Does the exclusionary rule keep evidence out of the prosecution's case in chief? |
Yes |
|
Can excluded evidence be used on cross examination? |
Yes to impeach the defendant's testimony |
|
Does a violation of the knock and announce rule trigger suppression? |
No |
|
To trigger he exclusionary rule the police onduct must be: |
Deliberate, reckless or grossly negligent |
|
What is direct evidence? |
Evidence seized that is directly linked to the violation |
|
What is derivative evidence |
evidence obtained by exploiting a prior unconstitutional search or seizure |
|
How can prosecutors nullify fruit of the poisonous tree? |
Must show a break in the causal link between the original illegality and the criminal evidence |
|
What are the 3 doctrines that can shows a break in the causal link? |
1) Independent source 2) Inevitable discovery 3) Attenuation |
|
Independent Source Doctrine |
Doctrine applies when a source exists for the seizure of the evidence that is distince from the original illegality |
|
Inevitable discovery doctrine |
the doctrine applies when the evidence would necessarily would have been discovered through legal means |
|
Attenuation doctrine |
This doctrine admits derivative evidence where the passage of time and intervening events purged the taint of the original illegality and restore the defendant's free will. |
|
What are the 4 major requirements for a valid wiretap? |
1) Suspected persons - must name expected persons 2) Time - must strictly limit time period 3) Crime - must be probable cause that crime was committed 4) Conversations - must describe with particularity the conversations that can be overheard |
|
Do you have a 4th amendment claim if you discuss something to someone who has agreed to a wiretap? |
No |
|
What is the New York limit on wiretap duration per warrant? |
30 days |
|
When does an arrest occur? |
1) Whenever the police take someone into custody against her will for prosecution or interrogation 2) It is considered a de facto arrest when the police compel someone to come to the station for questioning or fingerprinting |
|
What standard of proof applies to arrest? |
Probable cause |
|
For what offenses does the 4th amendment permit a custodial arrest? |
All offenses |
|
Do officers need a warrant to arrest someone in a public place? |
No |
|
Do officers need an arrest warrant to arrest someone at their home? |
Yes |
|
What do officers need to arrest someone at a third party's home? |
An arrest warrant and a search warrant |
|
What are the three constitutional challenges that can be made to a confession? |
1) Fourteenth Amendment - Due Process 2) Sixth Amendment - Right to Counsel 3) Fifth Amendment - Miranda Violation |
|
In NY what is the 4th challenge that can be brought against a confession |
State Constitution 6th amendment - indelible right to counsel |
|
What is the standard for excluding a confession under the Due Process Clause? |
Involuntariness - police coercion which overbears the suspect's will |
|
When does 6th amendment right to counsel attach? |
When formally charged |
|
When does 6th amendment right to counsel apply? |
All critical stages of prosecution |
|
In New York can police question someone if they are aware he is represented by counsel? |
Not about that charge or any other charge without his lawyer present |
|
In addition to actions taken after formal charging, when does the NY indelible right to counsel attach? |
Whenever there is a significant judicial activity before filing an accusatory intrument such that a defendant would benefit from the presence of counsel |
|
How must waiver of indelible right to counsel be taken? |
In the presence of the attorney |
|
What is the two part test for when Miranda rights are necessary? |
1) A reasonable person woudl have felt that she was not at liberty to end the interrogation and leave; and 2) the environment presents the same inherently coercive pressures as the station-house questioning at issue in Miranda |
|
What is the relevance of a juvenile's age in Miranda jurisprudence? |
Custody inquiry is objective but an officer knows or has reason to know of the juvenile's age it should be taken into account |
|
What qualifies as interrogation under Miranda? |
Any conduct by police that they know or should have known was likely to elicit an incriminating response |
|
What is the public safety exception to Miranda? |
If custodial interrogation is prompted by an immediate concern for public safety, miranda warnings are unnecessary and any incriminating statements are admissible against the suspect |
|
Incriminating statements made during a custodial interrogation are only admissible when what happens? |
1) officer reasonably conveys to the suspect his or her core miranda rights; and 2) thereafter obtains a valid waiver of a suspect's Miranda rights to silence and counsel |
|
What are the two core requirements of a Miranda waiver? |
1) Knowing and intelligent 2) Voluntary |
|
A Miranda waiver is knowing and intelligent, if... |
The suspect understands: 1) The nature of the rights; and 2) the consequences of abandoning them |
|
What is New York's Parent/Child rule for Miranda waivers? |
If the police use deception or concealment to keep a parent away from a child who is being interrogated, the child's waiver may be deemed invalid. |
|
Must a Miranda waiver be express? |
No |
|
Who bears the burden of proof with respect to Miranda waivers? |
The prosecution by a preponderance of the evidence |
|
How must a suspect invoke their right to remain silent? |
Unambiguously |
|
Once a suspect has invoked what happens next? |
Officers must scrupulously honor the invocation - cannot badger the suspect and must wait a significant amount of time before attempting to get a waiver again |
|
How must a suspect request counsel? |
In a way that is sufficiently clear that a reasonable officer in the same situation would understand the statement to be a request for counsel. |
|
What happens when a suspect lawyers up? |
All interrogation must cease unless initiated by the suspect |
|
How long does a request for counsel last? |
It expires 14 days after the suspect is released from custody |
|
May statements obtained in violation of Miranda be used on cross examination to impeach the defendant? |
Yes |
|
Must physical fruits of statement taken in violation of Miranda rights be suppressed? |
Not if statements were made voluntarily |
|
IS there a sixth amendment right to counsel at line-ups and show-ups? |
Yes if they take place after formal charging |
|
Is there a 6th amendment right to counsel at photo arrays? |
No, regardless if pre or post charging |
|
In NY is there a right to counsel at line-ups before the filing of formal charges? |
Yes if the polce are aware that you are represented by counsel on another charge and you request that counsel be present |
|
When does a pretrial identification procedure violate due process? |
When it is unduly suggestive that it creates a substantial likelihood of misidentification |
|
What is the remedy for constitutional violations in pretrial identifications? |
Exclusion of a witness's in court identification |
|
When can the prosecution avoid the exclusion of an in court identification even when pre-trial identification was unconstitutional? |
When they can prove that in-court identification is based on observations other than unconstitutional pre-trial identification |
|
What factors can be used to prove that witness identification is based on things other than unconstitutional identification? |
1) Witness opportunity to view D at crime scene; 2) the specificity of the description given to police; and 3) the certainty of the witness's identification |
|
In New York do all felonies require indictments? |
Yes |
|
In New York what must be established in an indictment? |
All elements of the offense and reasonable cause to believe that the accused committed the offense |
|
When does jeopardy attach in a jury trial? |
When Jury is sworn |
|
When does jeopardy attach in a bench trial? |
When first witness is sworn |
|
When does jeopardy attach in a guilty plea? |
When court accepts plea unconditionally |
|
What is the general rule regarding whether something is the same offense for the purposes of double jeopardy? |
Not the same offense if each contains an element that the other does not |
|
In NY what is the rule regarding the same offense for purposes of double jeopardy? |
D must be charged with all offenses arising from any single transaction unless 1) the offenses have substantially different elements; 2) each offense contains an element not in the other and prevents different harmd; 3) one is for criminal possession and the other is for use 4) each offense involves harm to a different victim |
|
What are the fourr exceptions to the double jeopardy rule that permit trial? |
1) A hung jury 2) a mistrial for manifest necessity 3) a sucessful appeal, unless based on insufficient evidence 4) a breach of the plea agreement by the D |
|
In New York can right to remain silent be asserted in a grand jury proceeding? |
No |
|
In New York what do witnesses receive at the Grand Jury? |
Transactional immunity automatically |
|
Transactional Immunity |
Shields witness from prosecution for any transaction they testified about in their immunized testimony |
|
What kind of immunity is used in NY? |
Transactional |