• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/205

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

205 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
2ND LEADING CAUSE OF DEATH IN THE UNITED STATES
CANCER
% OF AMERICANS NOW LIVING WHO WILL GET CANCER IN THEIR LIFETIME
30%
MOST FEARED DISEASES (GALLUP POLL)
CANCER - 58%

BLINDNESS - 21%

HEART DISEASE - 10%

ALZEIMER’S DISEASE - 4%

STROKE - 2%

LOSS OF LIMB - 2%
ARTHRITIS - 1%
US CANCER DIAGNOSES 2010
ALABAMA – 25,530

ARKANSAS – 16,070

FLORIDA – 113,400

GEORGIA – 44,580

MISSISSIPPI – 14,900

TEXAS – 105,000
US CANCER DEATHS 2010
ALABAMA – 10,210

ARKANSAS – 6,460

FLORIDA – 40,980

GEORGIA – 15,860

MISSISSIPPI – 6.060

TEXAS – 36,770
NEOPLASM
UNCORDINATED “NEW GROWTH” OF TISSUE

UNLIMITED GROWTH POTENTIAL

DOES NOT REGRESS WITH REMOVAL OF INITIATING STIMULIS
NEOPLASIA INVOLVES
GENETIC CHANGES THAT ALLOW EXCESSIVE AND UNREGULATED CELL PROLIFERATION THAT ARE INDEPENDENT OF PHYSIOLOGIC GROWTH-REGULATORY MECHANISMS
NEOPLASIA LIMITATIONS
NUTRITIONAL SUPPORT

VASCULAR SUPPLY

SOMETIMES ENDOCRINE SUPPORT
TUMOR
LITERALLY: A SWELLING

(MAY OR MAY NOT BE A NEOPLASM)

(TO ME: NEOPLASM = TUMOR)
ONCOLOGY
THE STUDY OF NEOPLASMS

ONCOLOGIC SURGEONS
RADIOLOGIC ONCOLOGISTS
MEDICAL ONCOLOGISTS
PATHOLOGISTS
NEOPLASMS -CLASSIFICATION-
NAME SHOULD TELL: CELL OF ORIGIN, LIKELY BEHAVIOR

EXCEPTIONS = FOLLOW RULES

MOST END IN -OMA
TYPES OF NEOPLASMS
BENIGN

MALIGNANT (CANCER)
BENIGN
A LOCALLY GROWING NEOPLASM WHICH USUALLY DOES NOT KILL THE PATIENT
MALIGNANT
(CANCER)

AN INVASIVE NEOPLASM WHICH HAS THE CAPACITY TO SPREAD TO OTHER PARTS OF THE BODY AND WILL KILL THE HOST UNLESS REMOVED
BENIGN NEOPLASM
BENIGN = “BLESSED”

REMAIN LOCALIZED

CANNOT SPREAD TO OTHER SITES

CAN BE SURGICALLY REMOVED

PATIENT GENERALLY SURVIVES

CAN BE SERIOUS (SIZE, LOCATION, FUNCTION)

DESIGNATED BY “-OMA”
USUALLY BENIGN TUMORS ARE NAMED BY
ADDING -OMA TO THE TISSUE OF HISTOGENESIS
BENIGN NEOPLASMS
FIBROMA – FIBROUS CT

CHONDROMA – CARTILAGE

OSTEOMA – BONE

LIPOMA – ADIPOSE TISSUE…

ADENOMA – GLANDULAR TISSUE

PAPILLOMA - EPITHELIAL
MALIGNANT NEOPLASM
MALIGNANT = “MALICIOUS”

AKA CANCER (“CRAB”)

INVADES AND DESTROYS ADJACENT TISSUE

CAN SPREAD (METASTASIZE) TO DISTANT SITES

MAY KILL THE HOST

TWO TYPES: CARCINOMAS, SARCOMAS
CARCINOMA
A MALIGNANT NEOPLASM DERIVED FROM EPITHELIAL TISSUES
CARCINOMAS GENERAL
EPITHELIAL ORIGIN

90% OF MALIGNANCIES

OLDER ADULTS

ULCERATED MASSES

FAIR PROGNOSIS
CARCINOMA EXAMPLES
SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA: STRATIFIED SQUAMOUS EPITHELIUM

ADENOCARCINOMA: GLANDULAR EPITHELIUM

TRANSITIONAL CELL CARCINOMA: TRANSITIONAL EPITHELIUM
SARCOMA
A MALIGNANT NEOPLASM DERIVED FROM MESENCHYMAL TISSUE
SARCOMAS GENERAL
MESENCHYMAL ORIGIN

10% OF MALIGNANCIES

YOUNGER PATIENTS

BULKY, FLESHY MASSES

POORER PROGNOSIS
SARCOMA EXAMPLES
FIBROSARCOMA

CHONDROSARCOMA

OSTEOSARCOMA

LIPOSARCOMA

RHABDOMYOSARCOMA

LEUKEMIA

LYMPHOMA
NEOPLASM -COMPONENTS-
PARENCHYMA

STROMA
NEOPLASM PARENCHYMA
NEOPLASTIC COMPONENT

CELLS SOMEWHAT RESEMBLE EACH OTHER

DETERMINES BIOLOGIC BEHAVIOR

DETERMINES NOMENCLATURE
NEOPLASM STROMA
SUPPORTING TISSUES

CONNECTIVE TISSUE, BLOOD VESSELS

CRUCIAL FOR TUMOR SURVIVAL

IMPARTS PHYSICAL CONSISTENCY TO TUMOR

MAY INFLUENCE NOMENCLATURE (DESMOPLASIA = ABUNDANT FIBROUS TISSUE; SCIRRHOUS CARCINOMA OF BREAST)
NEOPLASMS -CLASSIFICATION EXCEPTIONS-
SOME NAMED AFTER A PERSON (EWING’S SARCOMA)

SOME NAMES RETAINED BY USAGE (LEUKEMIA)

SOME HAVE DESCRIPTIVE NAMES (PAPILLARY CYSTADENOMA LYMPHOMATSUM)

SOME HAVE MULTIPLE NAMES (RENAL CELL CA, GRAWITZ TUMOR, HYPERNEPHROMA)

MIXED TUMORS EXIST (DIVERGENT DIFFERENTIATION, MULTIPLE CELL TYPES, PLEOMORPHIC ADENOMA OF SALIVARY GLAND, FIBROADENOMA OF BREAST)
CHORISTOMA
SINGLE ADULT TISSUE IN AN ECTOPIC LOCATION

DEVELOPMENTAL NEOPLASM
HAMARTOMA
ONE OR MORE TISSUES IN A NORMAL LOCATION IN EXCESSIVE AMOUNT

DEVELOPMENTAL NEOPLASM
TERATOMA
SEVERAL TISSUE IN ECTOPIC LOCATION

DEVELOPMENTAL NEOPLASM
BENIGN vs MALIGNANT
DIFFERENTIATION

MODE OF GROWTH

RATE OF GROWTH

METASTASIS
DIFFERENTIATION IS
THE EXTENT TO WHICH TUMOR CELLS RESEMBLE NORMAL CELLS
BENIGN NEOPLASMS ARE COMPOSED OF CELLS WHICH
CLOSELY RESEMBLE NORMAL CELLS
MALIGNANT NEOPLASMS VARY IN
DIFFERENTIATION BUT ARE LESS DIFFERENTIATED THAN NORMAL CELLS
DEGREES OF DIFFERENTIATION
WELL DIFFERENTIATED (CLOSE TO NORMAL; RECOGNIZABLE BUT ABNORMAL)

MODERATELY DIFFERENTIATED (FAIRLY ABNORMAL)

POORLY DIFFERENTIATED (VERY ABNORMAL; MAY NOT BE RECOGNIZABLE)
NEOPLASM FUNCTIONAL CAPACITIES
BETTER DIFFERENTIATED TUMORS RETAIN FUNCTIONAL CAPABILITIES

PRODUCTION OF CELL PRODUCTS (SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMAS MAKE KERATIN; ADENOCARCINOMA MAKE MUCIN)

ELABORATION OF HORMONES
NEOPLASM HORMONE PRODUCTION
NEUROENDOCRINE TUMORS

ECTOPIC HORMONE PRODUCTION

PARANEOPLASTIC SYNDROMES

LUNG CANCERS…

ACTH, PTH

MAY MISLEAD DIAGNOSIS
NEOPLASM FETAL PROTEINS
LIVER AND COLON CANCERS

CARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN…

α-FETOPROTEIN…

USED DIAGNOSTICALLY

USED PROGNOSTICALLY
POORLY DIFFERENTIATED TUMORS
GROW FASTER

ARE MORE INVASIVE

ARE MORE LIKELY TO METASTASIZE

METASTASIZE EARLIER

EXHIBIT LESS FUNCTIONAL CAPACITY

HAVE A POORER PROGNOSIS

BUT ARE MORE SENSITIVE TO IRRADIATION AND CHEMOTHERAPY
BENIGN VS MALIGNANT -HISTOLOGIC DIFFERENTIATION-
BENIGN: WELL

MALIGNANT: POORLY
DYSPLASIA DEFINITION
(ATYPIA)

LOSS OF UNIFORMITYOF CELLS AND THEIR ARCHITECTURAL ORIENTATION WITHIN TISSUE

DISORDERLY BUT TECHNICALLY NON-NEOPLASTIC PROLIFERATION
DYSPLASIA CHARACTERISTICS
OFTEN “PRE-MALIGNANT”: MAY BE MERELY REACTIVE; MAY OR MAY NOT PROGRESS TO CANCER; ODDS OF PROGRESSION INCREASES WITH SEVERITY OF CHANGES

APPLIES BEST TO EPITHELIUM
DYSPLASIA -HISTOLOGIC CRITERIA-
INCREASED NUCLEAR:CYTOPLASMIC RATIO

INCREASED HYPERCHROMATISM

INCREASED MITOTIC INDEX

MITOTIC FIGURES IN ABNORMAL LOCATIONS

NUCLEAR AND CYTOPLASMIC PLEOMORPHISM

ARCHITECTURAL ANARCHY (JUMBLING OF CELL LAYERS)

INTACT BASEMENT MEMBRANE (NO INVASION)
DYSPLASIA -DEGREES-
NO DYSPLASIA

MILD DYSPLASIA (CHANGES RESTRICTED TO BASAL CELL LAYER)

MODERATE DYSPLASIA (DYSPLASIA IN LOWER HALF OF EPITHELIUM)

SEVERE DYSPLASIA (DYSPLASIA IN UPPER EPITHELIAL LEVELS)

CARCINOMA-IN-SITU (FULL THICKNESS INVOLVEMENT)
ANAPLASIA
LACK OF CELLULAR DIFFERENTIATION

REALLY BAD DYSPLASIA

CELLS APPEAR PRIMATIVE, UNDIFFERENTIATED AND UNSPECIALIZED

HALLMARK OF MALIGNANCY!
ANAPLASIA MAY RESULT FROM
DEDIFFERENTIATION OF CELLS

OR

LACK OF STEM CELL DIFFERENTIATION
ANAPLASIA HISTOLOGIC CRITERIA
SAME AS DYSPLASIA BUT MORE SEVERE

FORMATION OF TUMOR GIANT CELLS

ATYPICAL MITOTIC FIGURES (TRIPOLAR)
BENIGN VS MALIGNANT -MODE OF GROWTH-
BENIGN: EXPANSILE

MALIGNANT: INVASIVE

RELIABLE FEATURE FOR BENIGN vs. MALIGNANT
BENIGN TUMORS MODE OF GROWTH
EXPANSILE

DISPLACE AND COMPRESS

SHARPLY DEMARCATED

MAY HAVE A FIBROUS CAPSULE
MALIGNANT TUMORS MODE OF GROWTH
INVASIVE

INFILTRATE, PENETRATE, DESTROY…

CANCER = “CRAB”
DYSPLASIA (ANAPLASIA) + INVASION =
CANCER
BENIGN VS MALIGNANT -RATE OF GROWTH-
BENIGN: SLOW

MALIGNANT: FAST
BENIGN TUMORS RATE OF GROWTH
TYPICALLY GROW SLOWLY

MAY ACHIEVE LARGE SIZES

MAY GROW RAPID DUE TO HORMONAL STIMULATION
MALIGNANT TUMORS RATE OF GROWTH
USUALLY GROW RAPIDLY

CORRELATES WITH DIFFERENTIATION

STILL TAKES YEARS TO BECOME A CLINICAL TUMOR

MAY OUTGROW BLOOD SUPPLY & NECROSE
METASTASIS
THE ABILITY TO SEED REMOTE TISSUES BY MALIGNANT CELLS
BENIGN VS MALIGNANT -METASTASIS-
BENIGN: NOT CAPABLE

MALIGNANT: CAPABLE
PRIMARY TUMOR
AT SITE OF ORIGIN
SECONDARY TUMORS
METASTASES

AT SITES OF SEEDING
METASTASIS
ALL MALIGNANT NEOPLASMS HAVE THE CAPACITY TO METASTASIZE

SOME ARE MORE PRONE THAN OTHERS (BASAL CELL CA OF SKIN RARELY METASTASIZES; PRIMARY BRAIN TUMORS RARELY METASTASIZE; SMALL CELL CARCINOMA OF LUNG ALMOST METASTASIZES)

METASTASIS MAY BE THE FIRST SIGN (EMBRYONAL CARCINOMA OF TESTIS)

50% HAVE METASTASES AT DIAGNOSIS (30% CLINICALLY EVIDENT; ADDITIONAL 20% OCCULT)


MORE RELIABLE FEATURE FOR BENIGN vs MALIGNANT

SIGNIFICANT FACTOR IN PROGNOSIS
METASTASIS FACTORS
TYPE OF CANCER

DEGREE OF ANAPLASIA

TUMOR SIZE
METASTASIS -PATHWAYS-
SEEDING OF BODY CAVITIES

LYMPHATIC SPREAD

HEMATOGENOUS SPREAD

IATROGENIC TRANSPLANTATION
SEEDING OF BODY CAVITIES
CELLS DETACH AND FLOAT IN BODY CAVITY FLUID

ATTACH TO BODY WALL, ORGANS

OVARIAN TUMORS, PENETRATING BOWEL CANCERS
LYMPHATIC SPREAD
FAVORED ROUTE OF CARCINOMAS

CELLS PENETRATE THIN WALLED LYMPHATIC VESSELS

DRAIN TO REGIONAL LYMPH NODES (“SENTINEL LYMPH NODE”)

OFTEN CAUSE LYMPHADENOPATHY (ENLARGEMENT OF LYMPH NODES; MAY ALSO BE REACTIVE)
HEMATOGENOUS SPREAD
FAVORED ROUTE FOR SARCOMAS &CARCINOMAS

VEINS > ARTERIES

EMBOLIZES TO NEXT CAPILLARY BED (LUNGS AND LIVER ARE FAVORED SITES; METASTATIC CANCER IS MORE COMMON THAN PRIMARY CANCER IN THESE SITES!)

SOME HAVE PREFERRED SITES (LUNG CANCER → ADRENALS AND BRAIN
PROSTATE CANCER → BONE)

SOME SITES RARELY AFFECTED (SKELETAL MUSCLE, HEART, KIDNEY)
NEW CASES OF CANCER DIAGNOSED IN THE U.S. EACH YEAR
ABOUT 1,400,000
CAUSES OF DEATH IN U.S.
HEART DISEASE

CANCER

STROKE

RESPIRATORY DISEASE

ACCIDENTS
BASAL CELL CARCINOMA OF SKIN STATS
IS THE MOST COMMON FORM OF CANCER – BY FAR!

ITS HAS A HIGH SURVIVAL RATE (90%+ FIVE YEAR SURVIVAL)

IF INCLUDED IN CANCER STATS IT WOULD SKEW THE STATISTICS

ACS DECIDED TO IGNORE IT
INCIDENCE OF CANCER -MALES-
55% OF ALL CANCERS

SITES :
PROSTATE – 33%
LUNG – 13%
COLON/RECTUM – 10%
INCIDENCE OF CANCER -FEMALES-
45% OF ALL CANCERS

SITES:
BREAST – 31%
LUNG – 12%
COLON/RECTUM – 11%
MORTALITY OF CANCER -MALES-
OVERALL SURVIVAL = 58%

MOST LETHAL SITES:
LUNG – 31%
COLON/RECTUM – 10%
PROSTATE – 9%
MORTALITY OF CANCER -FEMALES-
OVERALL SURVIVAL = 62%

MOST LETHAL SITES:
LUNG – 26%
BREAST – 15%
COLON/RECTUM – 10%
CANCER RATE TRENDS
STEADY INCREASE IN LUNG CA (SMOKING)

MARKED DECLINE IN UTERINE CERVICAL CA (ROUTINE PAP SMEARS)

STEADY DECLINE IN STOMACH CA (UNKNOWN REASONS)

SLIGHT DECLINE IN BOWEL CA (RECENT)

VERY SLIGHT DECLINE IN LUNG CA (RECENT)
GEOGRAPHIC VARIABLES
ENVIRONMENT CAUSES MUTATIONS (MUTATIONS CAUSE CANCER)

CHANGE OF ENVIRONMENT CHANGES RISK (IMMIGRANTS ASSUME RISK OF NEW LOCATION)

MANY ENVIRONMENTAL CARCINOGENS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED

MANY SOCIAL HABITS ARE CARCINOGENIC (TOBACCO, ALCOHOL, BETEL NUT)

SOME SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED (HPV)
INTERESTING GEOGRAPHIC FACTS
NASOPHARYNGEAL CARCINOMA - HONG CONG

ESOPHAGUS - FEMALES IN N. IRAN

STOMACH - JAPAN

COLORECTAL - UNITED STATES

LIVER - SUB-SARAHAN AFRICA

SKIN - NORTHERN AUSTRALIA

BREAST - EUROPE AND U.S.

PROSTATE - U.S. BLACKS

BURKITT’S LYMPHOMA - EQUITORIAL AFRICA
EPIDEMIOLOGY OF CANCER -AGE-
INCIDENCE INCREASES WITH AGE

INCREASED LONGIVITY = INCREASED CANCER RATE

80% OCCUR BETWEEN AGES 55-75

REASONS: ACCUMULATION OF MUTATIONS, REDUCED IMMUNOCOMPETENCY

RATES DECLINE AFTER AGE 75
CHILDHOOD CANCERS
LEUKEMIAS

CNS TUMORS

LYMPHOMAS

SOFT TISSUE SARCOMAS

BONE SARCOMAS (OSTEOSARCOMA, EWING’S SARCOMA)

NEUROBLASTOMA, PHEOCHROMOCYTOMA, WILM’S TUMOR
EPIDEMIOLOGY OF CANCER -RACE-
WHITE:
30% GET CANCER
40% SURVIVAL RATE

NON-WHITE:
32% GET CANCER
25% SURVIVAL RATE
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY -HEREDITY-
ONLY SMALL % INHERITED

INHERITED CANCER SYNDROMES (AUTOSOMAL DOMINANT PATTERN; GREATLY ↑ RISK OF CANCER)

FAMILIAL CANCERS (RUN IN FAMILIES; NO DEFINITE INHERITANCE PATTERN; BREAST, COLON, OVARY, BRAIN)

DEFECTIVE DNA REPAIR SYNDROMES (CHROMOSOMAL/DNA INSTABILITY; XEROSTOMIA PIGMENTOSA)
INHERITED CA SYNDROMES
RETINOBLASTOMA

ADENOMATOUS POLYPOSIS

NEUROFIBROMATOSIS

MULTIPLE ENDOCRINE NEOPLASIA SYDNROMES

BASAL CELL NEVUS SYNDROME
RETINOBLASTOMA
MALIGNANT NEOPLASM OF THE EYE

40% ARE INHERITED

MUTATION IN RB TUMOR SUPPRESSOR GENE

10,000X RISK

BILATERAL TUMORS OFTEN DEVELOP

ALSO RISK OF OSTEOGENIC SARCOMA
ADENOMATOIS POLYPOSIS
APC TUMOR SUPPRESSOR GENE

NUMEROUS COLONIC POLYPS

100% DEVELOP CA WITHOUT TX!
NEUROFIBROMATOSIS
NF1 OR NF2 GENE MUTATIONS

MULTIPLE NEUROFIBROMAS

CAFÉ-AU-LAIT SPOTS

NEUROFIBROSARCOMA DEVELOPS
MULTIPLE ENDOCRINE NEOPLASIA SYNDROMES
TYPES 1 AND 2 PRIMARILY

MEN1 OR RET GENE MUTATIONS

NEURAL/ENDOCRINE ANOMALIES (100% DEVELOP MUCOSAL NEUROMAS)

MEDULLARY THYROID CARCINOMA

PHEOCHROMOCYTOMA OF ADRENAL
BASAL CELL CARCINOMA SYNDROME
PATCH GENE MUTATION

BASAL CELL CARCINOMAS

JAW CYSTS (ODONTOGENIC KERATOCYSTS)

SKELETAL ANOMALIES (BIFID RIBS)
XEROSTOMIA PIGMENTOSA
INABILITY TO REPAIR DNA

SUN-INDUCED SKIN CANCER

RISK OF OTHER CANCERS
PERSISTENT CELL REPLICATION
ACQUIRED PRE-NEOPLASTIC CONDITION

SCC IN UNHEALED WOUNDS

HEPATOCELLULAR CA IN CIRRHOSIS
HYPERPLASTIC/DYSPLASTIC PROLIFERATIONS
ACQUIRED PRE-NEOPLASTIC CONDITION

ENDOMETRIAL HYPERPLASIA → ENDOMETRIAL CA

METAPLASIA/DYSPLASIA BRONCHUS → LUNG CA
CHRONIC ATROPHIC GASTRITIS
ACQUIRED PRE-NEOPLASTIC CONDITION

PERNICIOUS ANEMIA

Helicobacter pylori
CHRONIC ULCERATIVE COLITIS
ACQUIRED PRE-NEOPLASTIC CONDITION

COLORECTAL CA
LEUKOPLAKIA OF MUCOSAL SURFACES
ACQUIRED PRE-NEOPLASTIC CONDITION

SCC OF MOUTH, VULVA, PENIS
VILLOUS ADENOMA OF THE COLON
ACQUIRED PRE-NEOPLASTIC CONDITION

COLORECTAL CA
CARCINOGENESIS
THE MOLECULAR BASIS OF CANCER
MOLECULAR BASIS OF CANCER -FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES-
NON-LETHAL GENETIC DAMAGE CAUSES CANCER

TUMORS ARISE FROM CLONAL EXPANSION OF A MUTATED PROGENITOR CELL

CARCINOGENESIS IN A MULTISTEP PROCESS

REGULATORY GENES ARE THE TARGETS FOR GENETIC DAMAGE
NON-LETHAL GENETIC DAMAGE CAUSES CANCER
ACQUIRED FROM ENVIRONMENT (CHEMICALS, RADIATION, VIRUSES)

INHERITED
TUMORS ARISE FROM CLONAL EXPANSION OF A MUTATED PROGENITOR CELL
TUMORS ARE MONOCLONAL IN ORIGIN

MUTATIONS CONFER GROWTH AND SURVIVAL ADVANTAGES

TUMORS BECOME HETEROGENOUS AS THEY DEVELOP

AVERAGE CANCER HAS 9O MUTATIONS

HUNDREDS OF CANCER-ASSOCIATED GENES HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED: p53 MUTATED IN MANY CANCERS; c-ABL SPECIFIC FOR ONE CANCER (CML); EACH CAUSES DYSREGULATION
CARCINOGENESIS IN A MULTISTEP PROCESS
BOTH PHENOTYPE AND GENOTYPE CHANGES OCCUR

KARYOTYPE CHANGES MAY BE DETECTABLE: TRANSLOCATIONS (CML), DELETIONS, GENE AMPLIFICATIONS

MULTIPLE MUTATIONS ACCUMULATE (SUBCLONES; A SINGLE GENE MUTATION WILL NOT CAUSE CANCER)

TUMOR “EVOLVES” OVER TIME

TUMOR ATTAINS MULTIFACETED ABILITIES

ACCOUNTS FOR ↑ AGGRESSIVENESS
ABILITIES ACQUIRED BY CANCERS
ABILITY TO INVADE

INCREASED RATE OF GROWTH

ABILITY TO METASTASIZE

ANTIGENICITY (OR LACK THEREOF)

HORMONAL RESPONSIVENESS

SUSCEPTIBILITY TO ANTI-NEOPLASTIC DRUGS
REGULATORY GENE TARGETS
PROTO-ONCOGENES

TUMOR SUPPRESSOR GENES

GENES REGULATING APOPTOSIS

GENES INVOLVES IN DNA REPAIR
PROTO-ONCOGENES
GROWTH-PROMOTING GENES

MUTANT ALLELES = ONCOGENES

SINGLE ALLELE MUTATION CAN CAUSE CANCER (“DOMINANT”)
TUMOR SUPPRESSOR GENES
GROWTH-INHIBITING GENES

BOTH ALLELES MUST MUTATE (“RECESSIVE”)

SOME ACT AS PROMOTOR GENES (MUTATION ALLOWS PROLIFERATION; RB AND p53 ARE EXAMPLES)

SOME ACT AS CARETAKER GENES (INVOLVED IN DNA REPAIR)
GENES THAT REGULATE APOPTOSIS
NO APOPTOSIS – NO REMOVAL OF MUTATED CELLS

SOME DOMINANT

SOME RECESSIVE (LIKE TUMOR SUPPRESSOR GENES)
DNA REPAIR GENES
CARETAKER GENES

MUTATATION ALLOWS WIDESPREAD MUTATIONS IN GENOME

ALLOW OTHER MUTATIONS TO SURVIVE (MUTATOR PHENOTYPE)

OFTEN FIRST MUTATIONS TO OCCUR
PHYSIOLOGIC CHANGES LEADING TO MALIGNANCY
SELF-SUFFICIENCY IN GROWTH FACTORS

INSENSITIVITY TO GROWTH INHIBITION

EVASION OF APOPTOSIS

LIMITLESS REPLICATION POTENTIAL

SUSTAINED ANGIOGENESIS

ABILITY TO INVADE AND METASTASIZE

GENETIC INSTABILITY
NORMAL CELL PROLIFERATION
GROWTH FACTOR BINDS TO RECEPTOR

SIGNAL-TRANSDUCING PROTEINS ACTIVATED

SIGNAL TRANSMITTED TO NUCLEUS

INDUCTION OF DNA TRANSCRIPTION

CELL ENTERS CELL CYCLE

CELL DIVISION OCCURS
OVERVIEW OF ONCOGENES
PROMOTE AUTOMATOUS GROWTH IN CANCER CELLS

PROTO-ONCOGENE MUTATES INTO AN ONCOGENE

ONCOGENES PRODUCE ONCOPROTEINS (DEVOID OF REGULATORY ELEMENTS; DO NOT DEPEND ON GROWTH FACTORS; ONE ALLELE MUTATION IS ENOUGH)

ONCOPROTEINS PROMOTE CELL GROWTH
SELF-SUFFICIENCY IN GROWTH SIGNALS -HOW THEY DO IT-
GROWTH FACTORS

GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTORS

SIGNAL-TRANDUCING PROTEINS

NUCLEAR TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS

CYCLINS AND CDKs
GROWTH FACTORS
CANCER CELLS ACQUIRE ABILITY TO SYNTHESIZE GROWTH FACTORS

CELLS DEVELOP AUTOCRINE LOOPS: INDEPENDENT OF OTHER CELLS; PDGF IN SARCOMAS; FGF IN GI/BREAST/MELANOMAS
GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTORS
CANCER CELLS DEVELOP MUTANT GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTORS (CONTINUOUS MITOGENIC SIGNALS)

OVEREXPRESSION OF GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTORS:
HYPERRESPONSIVENESS TO GF

EGF IN SCC OF LUNG/H&N

HER2/NEU IN BREAST CA (POOR PROGNOSIS; ANTI HER2.NEU ANTIBODIES USED)
SIGNAL-TRANSDUCING PROTEINS
MUTATIONS CREATE SIGNALING PATHWAYS FOR GF RECEPTORS

COMMON MECHANISM IN CANCERS
RAS PROTO-ONCOGENE
SIGNAL-TRANSDUCING PROTEIN

MOST COMMON MECHANISM

RAS PROTEINS PERMANENTLY ACTIVATED

STIMULATES CELL CYCLE PROGRESSION
ABL PROTO-ONCOGENE
SIGNAL-TRANSDUCING PROTEIN

TYROSINE KINASE SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION

ABL GENE TRANSLOCATED FROM CH 9 TO CH 22

TRANSLOCATED PORTION FUSES WITH BCR REGION

BCR-ABL HYBRID PROTEIN UNREGULATES TK

TK ACTIVITY FAVORS CELL PROLIFERATION

ALSO IMPAIRS APOPTOSIS

CAUSES CML

INHIBITOR OF BCR-ABL PROTEIN USED TO TX CML
NUCLEAR TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS
MUTATION OF GENES REGULATING DNA TRANSCRIPTION

MYC PROTO-ONCOGENE (BURKITT’S LYMPHOMA; BREAST, COLON, LUNG)

PROTEINS FAVOR SUSTAINED PROLIFERATION (ACTIVATE CYCLIN-DEPENDENT KINASES; SUPPRESSES CDK INHIBITORS; ALLOWS CELL CYCLE PROGRESSION)
CYCLINS AND CDKs
CYCLINS REGULATE CELL CYCLE

DYSREGULATION FAVOR CELL PROLIFERATION

CYCLIN D GENES OVEREXPRESSED IN MANY CANCERS

SOME DOWN-REGULATE CDK INHIBITORS
INSENSITIVITY TO GROWTH-INHIBITORY SIGNALS
TUMOR SUPPRESSOR GENES

NORMALLY INHIBIT CELL PROLIFERATION

MUTATIONS REMOVE INHIBITION (ALLOW ENTRY INTO CELL CYCLE)

LOSS OF CELL CYCLE CONTROL IS FUNDAMENTAL TO MALIGNANCY

ALMOST ALL CANCERS DISABLE THE G1 CHECKPOINT
RB GENE
TUMOR SUPPRESSOR GENE

60% RETINOBLASTOMAS SPORATIC

40% ARE INHERITED

TWO-HIT HYPOTHESIS

RB ENFORCES THE G1 GAP
RB TWO-HIT HYPOTHESIS
TWO MUTATIONS REQUIRED TO PRODUCE RETINOBLASTOMA

FAMILIAL CASES: ONE DEFECTIVE COPY IS INHERITED; SOMATIC MUTATION SUPPRESSES THE OTHER ALLELE; LIKE AUTOSOMAL DOMINANT TRANSMISSION

SPORATIC CASES: REQUIRES TWO SOMATIC MUTATIONS; HOST MUST LOSE HETEROZYGOSITY TO GET TUMOR; MUST BECOME HOMOZYGOUS FOR MUTANT ALLELE
RB ENFORCES G1 GAP
DNA REPLICATION REQUIRES CYCLIN E/CDK2 ACTIVITY

EXPRESSION OF CYCLIN E DEPENDS ON E2F TF

ACTIVE RB INHIBITS E2F AND PREVENTS TRANSCRIPTION OF CYCLIN E

MUTATION INACTIVATES RB… ACTIVATES E2F… TRANSCRIPTION OF CYCLIN E… DNA REPLICATION AS CELLS ENTER S PHASE

RB ALSO BINDS OTHER TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS TO CAUSE LOSS OF NORMAL CELL CYCLE REGULATION

SOME DNA VIRUSES BIND TO RB… CELLS NOT INHIBITED BY ANTIGROWTH FACTORS
p53 GENE
TUMOR SUPPRESSOR GENE

“GUARDIAN OF THE GENOME”

70% OF CANCERS HAVE p53 MUTATION (LUNG, COLON, BREAST CANCER
p53 GENE NORMALLY
SENSES DNA DAMAGE: ALLOWS DNA REPAIR, BLOCKS REPLICATION OF FAULTY DNA, REMOVES DEFECTIVE CELLS

BLOCKS NEOPLASTIC TRANSFORMATION: INDUCES QUIESCENCE, INDUCES SENESCENCE, INDUCES APOPTOSIS
p53 MUTATION RESULTS IN
FAILURE TO ACTIVATE p53 GENES

NO CELL CYCLE ARREST, DNA REPAIR, SENESCENCE

ALLOWS MUTANT CELLS TO REPLICATE
LI-FRAUMENI SYNDROME
INHERIT MUTANT p53

DEVELOP MULTIPLE CANCERS BY AGE 50
TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR-ß PATHWAY
NORMALLY BLOCK CELL PROLIFERATION

MUTATION BLOCKS ANTIPROLIFERATIVE SIGNALS TO NUCLEUS

100% OF PANCREATIC CANCERS

83% OF COLON CANCERS
ADENOMATOUS POLYPOSIS COLI-ß-CATENIN PATHWAY
LOSS OF APC GENE

TUMOR SUPPRESSOR GENE

APC GENE NORMALLY: BLOCKS PROLIFERATION BY DEGRADING ß-CATENIN; WNT SIGNALING MOLECULE PREVENTS ß-CATENIN DEGRADATION

MUTATION ALLOWS CONSTANT PROLIFERATION WITHOUT WNT
NORMAL APOPTOSIS
EXTRINSIC PATHWAY
DEATH RECEPTOR PATHWAY

RECEPTOR ACTIVATES CASPASES

CASPASES DESTROY DNA & CYTOSKELETON
NORMAL APOPTOSIS INTRINSIC PATHWAY
MITOCHONDRIAL PATHWAY

↑ PERMEABILITY OF MITOCHONDRIAL MEMBRANE (MORE BAX AND BAK MOLECULES; FEWER BCL2 AND BCL-XL MOLECULES)

MITOCHONDRIA LEAK CYTOCHROME c

CYTOCHROME c ACTIVATES CASPASES
EVASION OF APOPTOSIS
GENE MUTATIONS FRUSTRATE APOPTOSIS

FLIP PROTEINS BIND DEATH RECEPTORS

BCL2 PROTECTS LYMPHOCYTES FROM APOPTOSIS (SEEN IN 85% OF B-CELL LYMPHOMAS)
NORMAL CELL REPLICATION POTENTIAL
HAVE A CAPACITY FOR 60-70 DOUBLINGS

GO INTO SENESCENCE AFTERWARDS

DUE TO SHORTENING OF TELOMERES

RECOGNIZED AS DNA DAMAGE

p53 AND RB ARREST CELL CYCLE
CANCER CELL REPLICATION POTENTIAL
TELEROMERASE UPREGULATION

TELOMERES DO NOT SHORTEN

ALLOWS CELLS TO CONTINUE DIVIDING

SEEN IN 85-95% OF CANCERS
SUSTAINED ANGIOGENESIS
ADEQUATE VASCULAR SUPPLY ESSENTIAL TO TUMOR SURVIVAL

COULD NOT ENLARGE OVER 1-2mm

p53… ALSO REGULATE ANGIOGENESIS
NORMAL ANGIOGENESIS
HYPOXIA → VEGF → HIF1α → ANGIOGENESIS

VHL DEGRADES HIF1α ≠ ANGIOGENESIS
CANCER CELL ANGIOGENESIS
VHL MUTATION ALLOWS ANGIOGENESIS
ANGIOGENIC INHIBITORS FOR TX
ANGIOSTATIN

ENDOSTATIN

VASCULOSTATIN
INVASION & METASTASIS -STEPS-
PRIMARY TUMOR DEVELOPS

INVASION OF ECM

VASCULAR DISSEMINATION

EVASTATION

ANGIOGENESIS AND GROWTH
DEVELOPMENT OF PRIMARY TUMOR
INITIAL MUTATION OCCURS

CLONAL EXPANSION

GROWTH

DIVERSIFICATION

ANGIOGENESIS
INVASION OF ECM: DETACHMENT
(“LOOSENING UP”)

MUTATION OF E-CADHERIN GENES

LOSS OF E-CADHERIN FUNCTION

EXPRESSION OF SNAIL OR TWIST
INVASION OF ECM: DEGRADATION OF ECM
SECRETION OF PROTEOLYTIC ENZYMES (PROTEASES)

COLLAGENASE ACTIVITY GREATED IN CA CELLS
INVASION OF ECM: ATTACHMENT TO ECM COMPONENTS
FIBRINECTIN

LAMININ
INVASION OF ECM: MIGRATION OF CELLS
CYTOKINASE INDUCES CYTOEKELETON CHANGES

CHEMOTAXIS EFFECT FROM CLEAVED ECM
VASCULAR DISSEMINATION
INTRAVASTATION (CELLS EXIT ECM INTO BLOODSTREAM; PROCESS SIMILAR TO INVASION)

CELLS/AGGREGATES EMBOLIZE

VASCULAR/LYMPHATIC DRAINAGE PREDICTS METASTATIC SITE

MOST LODGE IN FIRST CAPILLARY BED ENCOUNTERED (USUALLY LUNGS OR LIVER)

PATTERN OF SPREAD NOT ALWAYS PREDICTABLE (LUNG CANCER → ADRENAL GLANDS; HOMING DETERMINED BY RECEPTORS/LIGANDS)
GENOMIC INSTABILITY
DEFECTS ENABLE CANCER TO PERSIST
DEFECT IN MISMATCH REPAIR
GENOMIC INSTABILITY

FAILURE TO REPAIR NUCLEOSIDE MISMATCHES

HEREDITARY NONPOLYPOSIS COLON CANCER

ALLOWS ERRORS TO ACCUMULATE
DEFECT IN NUCLEOSIDE EXCISION REPAIR
GENOMIC INSTABILITY

NO REPAIR OF PYRIMIDINE CROSS-LINKAGES

XERODERMA PIGMENTOSA
DEFECTS IN RECOMBINATION REPAIR
GENOMIC INSTABILITY

HYPERSENSITIVITY TO DNA-DAMAGING AGENTS

BRCA1 AND BRCA2 IN BREAST CANCER
CARCINOGENIC AGENTS
CHEMICALS

RADIATION

MICROBIAL AGENTS
CHEMICAL CARCINOGENS: DIRECT-ACTING AGENTS
REQUIRE NO CONVERSION

MANY AGENTS

MOST WEAK CARCINOGENS

SOME CA TX NOW CARCINOGENIC
CHEMICAL CARCINOGENS: INDIRECT-ACTING AGENTS
REQUIRE CONVERSION (PROCARCINOGENS)

EXAMPLES:
POLYCYCLIC HYDROCARBONS – LUNG CA

AROMATIC AMINES – BLADDER CA

AFLATOXIN B1 – HEPATOCELLULAR CA
CHEMICAL CARCINOGENESIS -MECHANISMS--
GENETICS DETERMINES INDIVIDUAL SUSCEPTIBILITY

MOST ARE MUTAGENIC

USUALLY RAS & p53 MUTATIONS

SOME ACT AS INITIATORS
AUGUMENTED BY PROMOTERS:
INITIATOR CAUSES MUTATION

PROMOTER → CLONAL EXPANSION

SUBSEQUENT MUTATIONS → CANCER
CARCINOGENESIS -PHASES-
INITIATION PHASE (CARCINOGEN ACTS; MUTATIONS OCCUR)

PROMOTING PHASE (CELLS PROLIFERATE; CLONAL EXPANSION)

PROGRESSIVE PHASE - AUTONOMY

TUMOR PHASE (CLINICAL NEOPLASM; CAN INVADE AND METASTASIZE)
RADIATION CARCINOGENESIS
UV RAYS FROM SUNLIGHT

X-RAYS

NUCLEAR FISSION

RADIONUCLEOTIDES
RADIATION CARCINOGENESIS EVIDENCE OF CARCINOGENICITY
RADIUM MINERS HAVE 10X RISK OF LUNG CA

WWII SURVIVORS AND LEUKEMIA…

CANCERS IN AREA OF CHERNOBYL

THYROID CA FOLLOWING H&N IRRADIATION
RADIATION CARCINOGENESIS MECHANISMS
CHROMOSOME BREAKAGE

TRANSLOCATIONS

POINT MUTATIONS

PYRIMIDINE DIMERS (XERODERMA PIGMENTOSA)
MICROBIAL CARCINOGENS
ONCOGENIC RNA VIRUSES

ONCOGENIC DNA VIRUSES

Helicobacter Pylori
ONCOGENIC RNA VIRUSES
HUMAN T-CELL LEUKEMIA VIRUS (HTLV-1)

T-CELL LEUKEMIA/LYMPHOMA

TRANSMITTED SEXUALLY, BLOOD, BREAST MILK

3-5% INFECTED GET DISEASE

LONG LATENT PERIOD (20-50 YEARS)
HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS
ONCOGENIC DNA VIRUS

BENIGN SQUAMOUS PAPILLOMAS (WARTS)

SCC OF UTERINE CERVIX

OROPHARYNGEAL CA

INTERACT WITH ONCOGENES AND TUMOR SUPPRESSOR GENES
EPSTEIN-BARR VIRUS
ONCOGENIC DNA VIRUS

BURKITT’S LYMPHOMA

B-CELL LYMPHOMA IN AIDS

NASOPHARYNGEAL CA
HEPATITIS B VIRUS
ONCOGENIC DNA VIRUS

HEPATOCELLULAR CA
ONCOGENIC DNA VIRUSES
HUMAN PAPILLOMA VIRUS

EPSTEIN-BARR VIRUS

HEPATITIS B VIRUS

KAPOSI’S SARCOMA HERPESVIRUS
HELICOBACTER PYLORI
GASTRIC ADENOCARCINOMA (GASTRITIS… CELL PROLIFERATION)

GASTRIC LYMPHOMA (REACTIVE T CELLS… B CELL LYMPHOMA; MALT LYMPHOMA)
TUMOR ANTIGENS
ANTIGENS ON TUMOR CELLS THAT ELICIT AN IMMUNE RESPONSE

TYPES:
TUMOR-SPECIFIC ANTIGENS (ONLY ON TUMOR CELLS)

TUMOR-ASSOCIATED ANTIGENS (ON TUMOR CELLS AND NORMAL CELLS)
TUMOR ANTIGENS -TYPES-
PRODUCTS OF MUTATED GENES

OVER/ABERRANTLY EXPRESSED PROTEINS

PRODUCTS OF ONCOGENIC VIRUSES

ONCOFETAL ANTIGENS

ALTERED CELL-SURFACE MOLECULES

CELL TYPE-SPECIFIC DIFFERENTIATION ANTIGENS
PRODUCTS OF MUTATED GENES -ONCOGENES AND TS GENES-
ß-CATENIN, RAS, p53, CDK4…

SHARED BY MANY TUMORS

DO NOT ELICIT PROTECTIVE IMMUNE RESPONSES
PRODUCTS OF MUTATED GENES -OTHER GENES-
DUE TO GENETIC INSTABILITY

LEADS TO MANY MUTATIONS

EXTREMELY DIVERSE ANTIGENS

OFTEN OCCUR IN CHEMICAL OR RADIATION-INDUCED CANCERS

CAN BE TARGETED BY IMMUNE SYSTEM
OVER/ABERRANTLY EXPRESSES CELLULAR PROTEINS
OVER-EXPRESSES NORMAL PROTEINS (TYROSINE IN MELANOMAS; MAY ELICIT IMMUNE RESPONSE)

ANTIGENS THAT ARE NORMALLY SILENT (“CANCER-TESTIS” ANTIGENS; ONLY EXPRESSES IN TESTIS; USUALLY TUMOR-SPECIFIC ANTIGENS)
ANTIGENS PRODUCED BY ONCOGENIC VIRUSES
ANTIGENS ON ONCOGENIC VIRUSES

USUALLY DNA VIRUSES

MAY INDUCE PROTECTIVE IMMUNE RESPONSE

BASIS FOR HPV VACCINES
ONCOFETAL ANTIGENS
ANTIGENS FROM EMBRYOGENESIS

NOT NORMALLY EXPRESSED IN ADULTS

MUTATIONS INHIBIT SUPPRESSION AND ALLOW PROTEIN PRODUCTION

CARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN, α-FETOPROTEIN

LIVER AND LUNG CANCERS

USED FOR DETECTION AND MONITORING CANCERS
ALTERED CELL SURFACE MOLECULES
GLYCCOLIPIDS/GLYCOPROTEINS

HIGHER AMOUNT ON TUMOR CELLS

GANGLIOSIDES, BLOOD GROUP ANTIGENS, MUCINS…

MAY BE USED DIAGNOSTICALLY

MAY BE TARGETS FOR TX
CELL TYPE -SPECIFIC DIFFERENTIATION ANTIGENS
ANTIGENS PRESENT ON CELLS OF ORIGIN

B OR T-CELL MARKERS (CD10, CD20)

DO NOT INDUCE IMMUNE RNX
ANTITUMOR EFFECTOR MECHANISMS
CELL-MEDIATED IMMUNITY
CYTOTOXIC T LYMPHOCYTES
ANTITUMOR EFFECTOR MECHANISMS

PROTECTIVE AGAINST VIRUS-ASSOCIATED TUMORS
NATURAL KILLER CELLS
ANTITUMOR EFFECTOR MECHANISMS

1ST LINE OF DEFENSE AGAINST TUMOR CELLS

DESTROY TUMOR WITHOUT PRIOR SENSITIZATION

ACTIVATED BY IL-2
MACROPHAGES
ANTITUMOR EFFECTOR MECHANISMS

COLLABORATE WITH OTHER CELLS
HUMEROL MECHANISMS
ANTITUMOR EFFECTOR MECHANISMS

MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES FOR TX

CD20 FOR NON-HODGKINS LYMPHOMA
IMMUNE SURVEILLANCE
CANCER IS MORE COMMON IN INNUMODEFICIENT HOSTS
CANCER IS MORE COMMON IN IMMUMODEFICIENT HOSTS:
CONGENITAL IMMUNODEFICIENCY, IMMUNOSUPPRESSED TRANSPLANT PATIENTS, AIDS VICTIMS, MOST ARE LYMPHOMAS

TUMORS BECOME ANTIGEN NEGATIVE AS THEY PROGRESS (STRONGLY IMMUNOGENIC CELLS ARE ELIMINATED)

LOSS/REDUCED EXPRESSION OF HISTOCOMPATIBLE MOLECULES (FAILURE TO EXPRESS HLA CLASS I; NO CYTOTOXIC T LYMPHOCYTE ACTIVATION)

IMMUNOSUPPRESSION (CARCINOGENIC AGENTS SUPPRESS IMMUNE RESPONSE; TUMOR PRODUCTS MAY BE IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE (TGF-ß))
NEOPLASIA HORMONAL PRODUCTION
TUMORS MAY SECRETE HORMONES:
BENIGN > MALIGNANT
WELL DIFFERENTIATED > POOR

HORMONE EFFECTS MAY BE THE DOMINANT CLINICAL SYMPTOM

EVEN BENIGN TUMORS MAY CAUSE FATAL CONSEQUENCES
PARANEOPLASTIC SYNDROMES
ELABORATION OF ECTOPIC HORMONES

OCCURS IN 10-15% OF CANCERS

MAY BE EARLY MANIFESTATION

MAY HAVE SERIOUS (LETHAL) CONSEQUENCES

MAY CAUSE DIAGNOSTIC DIFFICULTY

COMMON WITH SOME CANCERS (LUNG, BREAST, HEMATOLOGIC CANCERS)

VERY DIVERSE SECRETIONS:
HYPERCALCEMIA –PTH, BONE DESTRUCTION

CUSHING SYNDROME – ACTH

NONBACTERIAL THROMBOTIC ENDOCARDITIS

SOME TUMORS PRODUCE MULTIPLE HORMONES AND SEVERAL SYNDROMES
CANCER CACHEXIA
WASTING SYNDROME

LOSS OF BODY FAT & LEAN MASS

WEAKNESS, ANOREXIA, ANEMIA
CANCER CACHEXIA
NOT NUTRITIONAL DEMANDS OF CA

ANOREXIA CONTRIBUTES

CYTOKINE (TNF) KEEPS DEMAND HI

PROTEOLYSIS-INDUCING FACTOR
OTHER NEOPLASIA SYMPTOMS
ULCERATION

BLEEDING

SECONDARY INFECTION

INTESTINAL OBSTRUCTION
NEOPLASIA GRADING AND STAGING
USE TO QUALTIFY BIOLOGICAL AGGRESSIVENESS OF A NEOPLASM

USEFUL TO PLAN TX

USEFUL TO PREDICT PROGNOSIS
NEOPLASIA GRADING
MICROSCOPIC OR CYTOLOGIC DIFFERENTIATION

BRODER’S SYSTEM
BRODER’S SYSTEM
WELL DIFFERENTIATED

LEAST LIKELY TO METASTASIZE

BEST PROGNOSIS
BRODER’S SYSTEM
MODERATELY DIFFERENTIATED

MAY METASTASIZE

INTERMEDIATE PROGNOSIS
BRODER’S SYSTEM
POORLY DIFFERENTIATED

LIKELY TO METASTASIZE

BAD PROGNOSIS
BRODER’S SYSTEM
VERY POORLY DIFFERENTIATED

VERY LIKELY TO METASTASIZE

WORST PROGNOSIS
NEOPLASIA STAGING
BASED ON CLINICAL/RADIOGRAPHIC EXTENT OF TUMOR

BETTER THAN GRADING

TNM AND AJC SYSTEMS
NEOPLASIA STAGING
SIZE OF PRIMARY TUMOR

INVOLVEMENT OF REGIONAL LYMPH NODES

DISTANT METASTASIS
NEOPLASIA MORPHOLOGIC DIAGNOSIS
BIOPSY

FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION

CYTOLOGY SMEARS

IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY

FLOW CYTOMETRY
NEOPLASIA LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS
MORPHOLOGIC METHODS

TUMOR MARKERS

MOLECULAR DIAGNOSIS

MOLECULAR PROFILING
NEOPLASIA BIOPSY
EXCISION OF TISSUE:
INCISIONAL – REMOVE PART
EXCISIONAL – REMOVE ALL

“GOLD STANDARD” FOR DIAGNOSIS

H&E AND SPECIAL STAINS USED

FROZEN SECTION DIAGNOSIS
NEOPLASIA CYTOLOGY SMEARS
PAPANICOLAUO SMEARS

UTERINE CERVIX, ENDOMETRIAL, BRONCHIAL CANCERS

CANNOT EVALUATE INVASION!
NEOPLASIA FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION
ASPIRATION OF CELLS

MINIMALLY INVASIVE PROCEDURE

USED FOR SUPERFICIAL MASSES

BREAST, THYROID, LYMPH NODES, SALIVARY GLANDS, LIVER…

SMALL SAMPLE CAN POSE PROBLEMS
NEOPLASIA IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY
ADJUNCT TO ROUTINE HISTOLOGY

PEROXIDASE-LABELED ANTIBODIES AGAINST TUMOR SPECIFIC ANTIGENS

HELPS DIAGNOSE POORLY DIFFERENTIATED TUMORS
FLOW CYTOMETRY
FLUORESCENT ANTIBODIES AGAINST CELL SURFACE ANTIGENS

LEUKEMIAS AND LYMPHOMAS
TUMOR MARKERS
BIOASSAYS FOR TUMOR-ASSOCIATED ENZYMES, HORMONES…

USEFUL FOR FINDING TUMORS (NOT SO MUCH FOR DIAGNOSING)

MAY LACK SENSITIVITY/SPECIFICITY:
PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN (PSA) (PROSTATE CANCER)

CARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN (CEA) (COLON CANCER)

Α-FETOPROTEIN (HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA)

MONITER EFFECTIVENESS OF TX
NEOPLASIA MOLECULAR DIAGNOSIS
DIAGNOSIS OF MALIGNANCY (FISH/PCR TECHNIQUES)

PREDICTING PROGNOSIS/BEHAVIOR (CERTAIN GENETIC DEFECTS DENOTE POOR PROGNOSIS)

DETECTION OF RESIDUAL DISEASE

DIAGNOSIS OF HEREDITARY PREDISPOSITION TO CANCER
MOLECULAR PROFILING
DNA MICROARRAY ANALYSIS (THOUSANDS OF GENES!)

MAY REVEAL TARGETS FOR TX
TREATMENT OF NEOPLASMS
BENIGN NEOPLASMS (USUALLY CONSERVATIVE EXCISON: “LUMPECTOMY”)

MALIGNANT NEOPLASMS (RADICAL SURGICAL EXCISION)

RADIOTHERAPY (POST-RADIATION COMPLICATIONS)

CHEMOTHERAPY (CYTOTOXIC DRUGS, METABOLIC INHIBITORS)

IMMUNOMODULATION

COMBINED THERAPY
SKIN CANCER
MOST COMMON SITE

LOW MORTALITY

SUNLIGHT EXPOSURE

BASAL CELL CARCINOMA (IGNORED IN STATISTICS)

SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA

MELANOMA
LUNG CANCER
12% OF ALL CANCER

30% OF ALL CANCER DEATHS

INCREASING SINCE WWII (SLIGHT DECREASE RECENTLY)

WOMEN CATCHING MEN

SMOKING
COLORECTAL CANCER
10% OF ALL CANCER

10% OF ALL CANCER DEATHS

SLIGHT DECREASE RECENTLY (ROUTINE COLONOSCOPY)

PRE-EXISTING POLYPS

HEREDITARY SYNDROMES
BREAST CANCER
31% OF FEMALE CANCER

15% OF FEMALE CANCER DEATHS

HEREDITARY, HORMONES..
UTERINE CERVICAL CANCER
ONCE MOST COMMON FEMALE CANCER

DECLINING DUE TO PAP SMEAR
PROSTATE CANCER
33% OF ALL MALE CANCER

9% OF ALL MALE CANCER DEATHS

AFRICAN-AMERICAN MEN

PSA SCREENING