• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/9

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

9 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
What is the definition of Negligence? Also include the 4 elements in your answer.
Failure to act with reasonable skill and care for the protection of others. There was a duty (standard of care) owed to P, a breach of that duty, D was the cause of the harm to P and P suffered actual damages.
What is the Rule of Law for a Breach?
D's failure to conform with a set standard of care to others and creation of an unreasonable risk.
What tests do we use to determine the existence of a breach?
1. Balancing Test

2. Reasonably Prudent Person standard.
what is the balancing test?
Forseeability is a major elements:

1 the existence of some REAL likelihood of some damage
2. the likelihood of some damage is of some APPRECIABLE WEIGHT
3. to induce action to avoid it.

PL > B

P = forseeability of the harm
L = degree of resulting harm
B = D's burden (cost) of avoiding the harm.
who establishes the standard of care due?
Plaintiff!
what are some factors you want to be aware of before diving into answering what is the standard of care due?
are we dealing with a child?
are we dealing with a professional?
are we dealing with a special trade/custom?
are we dealing with a person who is mentally impaired or disabled?
are we dealing with a emergency situation?
The professional, what do we say in this situation?

who would establish the standard of care for the jury?
it is a reasonably prudent person of [insert profession] who has the same knowledge, skill and training as a member of that profession in good standing.

expert witnesses would establish it.
what is the locality rule vs national rule and when would we see it being discussed?
first, you would see it being discussed in regards to establishing what the standard of care would be for professionals.
locality rule - look to the geographical area around D (professional) to see what the standard of care is for other professionals around in the are (similar community in similar circumstacnes).

national rule - is the D (professional) someone who abides by a national standard of care like a doctor who must be board certified nationally?
what is the Doctrine of Informed Consent and when would we see it being applied?
In cases where were seeing if a breach existed for doctors, a doctor MUST inform/disclose patient of all material risks involved or he could be held liable.
* furthers principle of self-determination an that patient is master of his body

elements:
1. duty to inform: Doc must disclose all material risk involved (material risks are those which would affect patients decision if he had knowledge of it)
2. causation: if patient was informed of the risks, he would not have consented.
3. injury: the undisclosed risk must manifest itself and cause injury to P