Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
42 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Research utilization
|
use of findings from research to apply to un unrelated field
|
|
3 types of RU
|
1/ indirect
2/ direct 3/ persuasive |
|
Evidence hierachies
|
rank evidence sources according to their strength
|
|
7 levels of evidence hierachies
|
1/ systematic review of RCTs or quasiexperimetals
2/ Single RCT/ nonrandomized trial 3/ SV of correlational 4/ single correlational 5/ SV of descriptive/ qualitative/ physiologic 6/ Single descriptive/q/p 7/ opinions |
|
Barriers to RU and EBP
|
1/ quality and nature of researc
2/ nurse charateristics 3/ organizational factors |
|
Differences between RU and EBP
|
1/ RU starts with another research
2/ EBP start with a clinical question |
|
Metaanalysis
|
integrating quantitative statistically
|
|
Metasynthesis
|
qualitative findings then come up with a theory
|
|
background questions
|
foundational questions about issue, found in textbooks
|
|
foreground questions
|
answered based on best research evidence
|
|
Appraising evidence
|
1/ Evidence quality (valid)
2/ Magnitude of effects : results are clinically important 3/ Precision of estimates 4/ Peripheral effects: costs, other factors 5/ Finincial issue 6/ Clinical relevance 7/ actions based on the evidence appraisals |
|
Two types of stimulus for EBP
|
1/ problem - focused
2/ knowledge-focused |
|
Clinical practice guidelines
|
specific recommendations for evidence-based decision making
|
|
Implementation potential
|
1/ Tranferability
2/ Feasibility 3/ Cost-to-benefit ratio |
|
Pilot test
|
trial run in clinical to evaluate outcomes
1/ Develop an evaluatio plan 2/ Measure outcomes before intervene 3/ train staff 4/ try on several units 4/ evaluate the process and outcomes |
|
Concepts - Phenomena
|
abstractions of aspects.
E.g. pain, spirituality, resilience are concepts of human behavior and characteristic |
|
Theory
|
systematic, abstract explanation of some aspect of reality
|
|
Conceptual Model
|
deductive reasoning to make predictions about how phenomena would behave in the real world if the theory were true
|
|
Conceptual definition
|
abstract or theoretic meaning of the concepts
|
|
operational definition
|
operations that must perform to collect the required info.
|
|
phases of a quantitative study
|
1/ conceptual phase
2/ design and planning 3/ empirical 4/ analytic 5/ dissemination |
|
phase 1 : conceptual
|
1/ formulating and delimiting problem
2/ literature review 3/ undertake clinical fieldwork 4/ Define framework/conceptual definition 5/ Hypotheses |
|
Phase 2: design and planning
|
6/ select a research design
7/ develop protocols 8/ identify pop 9/ design sampling plan 10/ specify methods 11/ develop methods with safety 12/ finalize the research plan |
|
Phase 3: empirical
|
13/ collect date
14/ prep data for analysis |
|
phase 4: analytic
|
15/ analyse data
16/ interpret results |
|
phase 5: dessemination
|
17/ communicate findings
18/ utilize findings in practice |
|
presentations at professional conference
|
1/ oral
2/ poster sessions |
|
Research journal articles
|
summarize studies in professional journals
1/ peer review 2/ blind review |
|
Introduction
|
1/ central phenomena/concepts/variables
2/ Purpose, questions, hypothesis 3/ literature review 4/ theoretical/conceptual framework 5/ significance and need for study |
|
Method
|
1/ design
2/ sampling plan and description of participants 3/ methods, instruments 4/ procedures, including protecting the rights of sub 5/ analytic procedure and method |
|
Results section
|
presents findings
1/ names of statistical tests 2/ value of statistic 3/ significance 4/ precision and magnitude |
|
Discussion
|
1/ interpretation of results
2/ Clinical and research implications 3/ Study limitations and ramifications |
|
Why are research so hard to read
|
1/ Compactness
2/ jargon 3/ Objectivity: passive voice, impersonal 4/ Statistical info |
|
Critique need to evaluate what aspects of the study
|
1/ substantive - significance
2/ theoretical 3/ methodologic - methods 4/ interpretive - intepretation 5/ ethical 6/ stylistic - clearly written, grammatical and well-organized |
|
interference
|
conclusion drawn from the study evidence based on methods
|
|
Scientific merit
|
criteria to assess the quality of a study, include reliability and validity
|
|
Reliability
|
accuracy and consistency of info
|
|
Validity
|
soundness of study's evidence
|
|
Bias
|
influence that produces an error in an estimate or an inteference
|
|
Research control
|
holding constant influences on dependent variable so true relationship can be understood
|
|
Masking
|
concealing info from participants, data collectors, care providers, data analysts
|
|
Generalizability
|
assess the extent to which the finding can be applied to other groups and settings
|