• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/42

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

42 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Research utilization
use of findings from research to apply to un unrelated field
3 types of RU
1/ indirect
2/ direct
3/ persuasive
Evidence hierachies
rank evidence sources according to their strength
7 levels of evidence hierachies
1/ systematic review of RCTs or quasiexperimetals
2/ Single RCT/ nonrandomized trial
3/ SV of correlational
4/ single correlational
5/ SV of descriptive/ qualitative/ physiologic
6/ Single descriptive/q/p
7/ opinions
Barriers to RU and EBP
1/ quality and nature of researc
2/ nurse charateristics
3/ organizational factors
Differences between RU and EBP
1/ RU starts with another research
2/ EBP start with a clinical question
Metaanalysis
integrating quantitative statistically
Metasynthesis
qualitative findings then come up with a theory
background questions
foundational questions about issue, found in textbooks
foreground questions
answered based on best research evidence
Appraising evidence
1/ Evidence quality (valid)
2/ Magnitude of effects : results are clinically important
3/ Precision of estimates
4/ Peripheral effects: costs, other factors
5/ Finincial issue
6/ Clinical relevance
7/ actions based on the evidence appraisals
Two types of stimulus for EBP
1/ problem - focused
2/ knowledge-focused
Clinical practice guidelines
specific recommendations for evidence-based decision making
Implementation potential
1/ Tranferability
2/ Feasibility
3/ Cost-to-benefit ratio
Pilot test
trial run in clinical to evaluate outcomes
1/ Develop an evaluatio plan
2/ Measure outcomes before intervene
3/ train staff
4/ try on several units
4/ evaluate the process and outcomes
Concepts - Phenomena
abstractions of aspects.
E.g. pain, spirituality, resilience are concepts of human behavior and characteristic
Theory
systematic, abstract explanation of some aspect of reality
Conceptual Model
deductive reasoning to make predictions about how phenomena would behave in the real world if the theory were true
Conceptual definition
abstract or theoretic meaning of the concepts
operational definition
operations that must perform to collect the required info.
phases of a quantitative study
1/ conceptual phase
2/ design and planning
3/ empirical
4/ analytic
5/ dissemination
phase 1 : conceptual
1/ formulating and delimiting problem
2/ literature review
3/ undertake clinical fieldwork
4/ Define framework/conceptual definition
5/ Hypotheses
Phase 2: design and planning
6/ select a research design
7/ develop protocols
8/ identify pop
9/ design sampling plan
10/ specify methods
11/ develop methods with safety
12/ finalize the research plan
Phase 3: empirical
13/ collect date
14/ prep data for analysis
phase 4: analytic
15/ analyse data
16/ interpret results
phase 5: dessemination
17/ communicate findings
18/ utilize findings in practice
presentations at professional conference
1/ oral
2/ poster sessions
Research journal articles
summarize studies in professional journals
1/ peer review
2/ blind review
Introduction
1/ central phenomena/concepts/variables
2/ Purpose, questions, hypothesis
3/ literature review
4/ theoretical/conceptual framework
5/ significance and need for study
Method
1/ design
2/ sampling plan and description of participants
3/ methods, instruments
4/ procedures, including protecting the rights of sub
5/ analytic procedure and method
Results section
presents findings
1/ names of statistical tests
2/ value of statistic
3/ significance
4/ precision and magnitude
Discussion
1/ interpretation of results
2/ Clinical and research implications
3/ Study limitations and ramifications
Why are research so hard to read
1/ Compactness
2/ jargon
3/ Objectivity: passive voice, impersonal
4/ Statistical info
Critique need to evaluate what aspects of the study
1/ substantive - significance
2/ theoretical
3/ methodologic - methods
4/ interpretive - intepretation
5/ ethical
6/ stylistic - clearly written, grammatical and well-organized
interference
conclusion drawn from the study evidence based on methods
Scientific merit
criteria to assess the quality of a study, include reliability and validity
Reliability
accuracy and consistency of info
Validity
soundness of study's evidence
Bias
influence that produces an error in an estimate or an inteference
Research control
holding constant influences on dependent variable so true relationship can be understood
Masking
concealing info from participants, data collectors, care providers, data analysts
Generalizability
assess the extent to which the finding can be applied to other groups and settings