Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
23 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Problem statements 6 components
|
1/ Identification
2/ background 3/ Scope of the problem (how big?) 4/ Consequences of the prob 5/ Knowledge gaps (wat info is lacking) 6/ Propose solution |
|
Statement of Purpose
|
- general direction of the inquiry and captures
- in quantitative study, identifies variables, relationship and population "test, evaluate, examine, compare" " prove, demonstrate, show" is bias |
|
Research questions
|
Focus attention
In quantitative studies: - conceptualize questions in term of variables Tx: In P, what is the effect of IV on DV Prognosis: In P, does IV affect or influence IV? Etiology/harm: In P, does IV cause or increase risk of DV - Research questions are more complex than clinical foreground questions |
|
Hypothesis
|
- a prediction
- sometimes emerge from theory |
|
Characteristic of a testable hypothesis
|
- expected relatioships btween IV and DV in P.
- based on justified rationales |
|
Ethical principals for protecting study participants
|
1/ Beneficience
2/ Respect to human dignity 3/ Justice |
|
Beneficience
|
Duty to minimize harm and maximize benefits
1/ Freedom from harm and discomfort 2/ Protection from exploitation - should not place them in situation that they are not prepared |
|
Respect for human dignity
|
1/ Right to self-determination - right to participate or withdraw
Coercion: threats by penalty from failing to participate 2/ Right to full disclosure + researcher fully described the nature of the study + pt's right to refuse participation + responsibilities, risks and benefits |
|
Cover data collection ( Concealment)
|
collect data without the sub's knowledge or consent
|
|
Deception
|
withhold info about the study, provide false info.
|
|
Justice
|
1/ Right to fair tx
2/ Right to privacy (HIPAA) |
|
Procedures for protecting participants
|
1/ Risk-Benefit assessment
2/ Informed consent 3/ Confidentiality: - Anonymity - Confidentiality in the absence of anonymity 4/ Debriefings and Refferals 5/ Tx of vulnerable subjects 6/ External reviews and the protection of human rights (IRB) |
|
Minimal risk
|
risk no greater than those ordinarily encountered in daily life or during routine physical or psychological tests or procedures
|
|
Implied consent
|
the return of the completed questionnaire reflects the respondent's voluntary consent to participate
|
|
Process consent
|
qualitative study, ongoing, transactional consent.
|
|
Anonymity
|
researcher cannot link participants to their data
|
|
Confidentiality
|
info provided will not be publicly reported
|
|
Debriefing sessions
|
permit participants to ask questions or air complaints.
|
|
Vulnerable subjects
|
incapable of giving own consent or high risk for unintended SE because of their condition
1/ Children (Assent) 2/ Mentally/emotionally disabled people 3/ Severely ill/physically disabled 4/ Terminally ill 5/ Institutionalized peopel 6/ pregnant women |
|
Research misconduct
|
fraud and misintepretation of data.
|
|
Fabrication
|
making up data or study results and report them
|
|
Falsification
|
manipulating research materials, equipment or processes
changing or omitting data distorting results |
|
Plagiarism
|
appropriation of other's ideas, results or words
|