Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
22 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
What Is photovoice |
Intermingling of images and words to shed light on the lived experiences of marginalized populations |
|
What is the point of photovoice? |
To empower marginalized populations to create change in community |
|
4 key concepts of photovoice |
Empower marginalized people Influence policy Present to influential decision makers Emphasizes individual and community action |
|
When to use photovoice? |
in any sort of marginalized population: homeless Social/health issues of youth Mental health concerns indigenous research |
|
Advantages of photovoice |
-People are supported to see both sides of a story -People learn how community functions -Improves self esteem -stimulates creativity -Examines struggles/celebrates successes -Develops sense of belonging |
|
Photovoice process: |
1. Connect/consult community 2. Plan photovoice project 3. Recruit target audience and participants 4. Grp meetings (train members) 5. collect data 6. analyze data 7. prepare exhibit/share 8. Social action/policy changes to be made |
|
photovoice limitations |
-Community must work together for long period time - commitment -May not get desired outcome -Troubles presenting complex issues with pictures -Close examination of issue might cause negative feelings |
|
What is Q - Methodology |
Used to objectively measure similarities/differences in attitudes and subjective opinions |
|
What is the process for Q- Methodology? |
1. Identify question designed to reveal opinions 2. Make list of items that pertain to topic 3. Make Q sort deck by putting each statement on Q card 4. Select participants purposively (different POV's) 5. Participants to sort deck into "agree" "disagree" and "neutral" piles 6. Force distribution of those into normal distribution curve 7. Record and interpret placement |
|
What are other kinds of sorts for Q sort deck? |
Ideal sort: participants sort cards based on what is ideal for them as a group Self ideal sort: participant sorts cards based on own ideal Prediction sort: participant sorts cards based on what he/she thinks another person would find ideal |
|
Benefits of Q methodology? |
good for vulnerable populations that are intimidated by research process Novel/fun |
|
What is the delphi process? |
series of surveys/questionnaires administered to a panel of experts |
|
benefits of Delphi process? |
Ideal for getting knowledge from experts that are busy, can't attend meetings or are too far away fast, inexpensive Discourages people from being influenced by others' opinions as a result of face-to-face contact |
|
downsides of Delphi process? |
Not always prompt response from expert (or not at all) Often have to offer honorarium Requires multiple data collection and analysis |
|
Steps of the Delphi process? |
1. recruit experts (different POV's, opinions and personalities) 2. Round 1 - Have experts provide demographics, rate items on Likert scale and provide additional info through open ended questions 3. Round 2 - gather similar additional information and have experts rate on Likert scale based on relevance 4. Roun 3 - Set aside all data that has 70% agreement consensus and have experts re-evaluate data that is below threshold - discard data that is still below 70% after re-eval. 5. Optional ranking - Have experts rate all 70% agreement consensus data once again |
|
What is participatory action research |
A way to understand and improve the world by changing it. Subjects and participants try to change and improve their practice |
|
How does PAR differ from conventional research? |
Enables action - deliberately shared power btwn researcher and participant Participants collect, analyze data then decide what action to take resultant action is re-studied (iterative process) |
|
Describe the iterative process in PAR |
Start with observation, then reflect on a problem , plan a solution and act on it --> observe this implementation, reflect on it etc.. |
|
How to PAR differ from a positivist design? |
- Belief that researcher and participants have impact on phenomenon - Variables not controlled, no belief that there is only a single reality |
|
What type of data do PAR researchers prefer? |
Qualitative and quantitative equally |
|
Benefits of PAR |
- Empowers oppressed people - Collaboration of people with diverse knowledge, skills, expertise - Comm. & researcher ID what needs change |
|
Downside of PAR |
'messy' design deters funding not usually featured in literature time consuming/unpredictable Everyone and their busy agendas must find time to work together |