• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/11

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

11 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Definition of Murder + where it came from

Lord Coke 1797


Unlawful killing of a human being under the Queen's peace with malice afterthought

Unlawful killing

Killing must be unlawful but defences can make killings lawful. The act or the omission must be proved with causation.


Foetuses cannot be murdered

Cases for unlawful killing

R v Clegg 1995 - unlawful killing kills people who nearly drove into him when there was no fear of them coming back


Dr Bodkin Adams 1957 - lawful killing in administrating pain medication

Queens Peace

Killing under the Queen's peace means that a soldier killing an enemy at war will not be murder

Human being

The killing must be of a human being.


Cannot murder a fetus

Human being case

Af ref no 3 of 1994 - foetus becomes a human being when fully expelled from mother


R v Inglis 2011 - disabled humans are still humans kills son with lethal dose of of heroin

Intention to kill

Direct intent is where the defendant wants to kill


Oblique intent is where death is forseen as virtually certain

Malice afterthought

Intention to kill or cause GBH and nothing less established in R v Moloney 1985

Intent to cause GBH

If the defendant is willing to harm the victim to the extent of GBH then they can see the risk for murder

Intention to cause GBH case

R v Vickers 1957 - lethal weapon and intended to cause GBH but killed

Case for intention to cause GBH

R v Cunningham 1982 - Intended to cause harm to someone who had an affair