Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
41 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Transfer of Learning
|
The Influence of having:
- Previously Practiced or Performed a skill - On the Learning of a New Skill |
|
Positive Transfer
|
The Beneficial Effect of Previous Experience on
- Learning/Performance of a New Skill - or The Performance of a Skill in a New Context |
|
Negative Transfer
|
The Negative Effect of Prior Experience on
- the Performance of a skill - The Person Performs the Skill LESS well - Than with no experience |
|
Transfer-Appropriate Processing Theory
|
An Explanation of Positive Transfer Proposing:
- Transfer is Due to the Similarity in the Cognitive Processing Characteristics - Required by the Two Skills or Two Performance Situations |
|
Identical Elements Theory
|
Explanation of Positive Transfer
- Proposing that transfer is due to the - Degree of Similarity between - Component Parts or Characteristics of two Skill/Performance Contexts |
|
Bilateral Transfer
|
Learning between:
- Two Limbs Phenomenon when: - Non-Practicing Limb Benefits from Practicing Limb Work - Asymmetric: Better transfer from Dominant - to - Non-dominant |
|
Asymmetric Transfer
|
Bilateral Transfer
- Greater amount of transfer from - One Limb than the other Limb |
|
Symmetric Transfer
|
Bilateral Transfer:
- Transfer is similar from One Limb to the Other - No matter what limb was used first |
|
Two Reasons for Positive Transfer
|
1. Function of similarity of:
- Skills performed - Environmental Contexts 2. Function of Similarity of: - Cognitive Processing in two situations |
|
Duration of Negative Transfer Effects
|
- Temporary
- Overcome with Practice - Typical of New Movement in Familiar Environmental Context |
|
Two Reason for Negative Transfer Effects
|
1. Inherent Difficulty in Altering:
- Preferred Perception-action Coupling - Has Been Developed for Moving in a Specific Environmental Context 2. Initial Cognitive Confusion from: - Person not certain on how to Move in a Familiar Environmental Context |
|
Two Reasons for Bilateral Transfer
|
1. Person Applies Knowledge Applied with Practice with one Limb to Initial Performance of Contralateral Limb
2. Motor Control System Learns in a: - Non-Limb-Specific Way - Provides Basis from non practiced Limb |
|
Practice Variability
|
The Variety of:
- Movement - Context Characteristics - While Practicing a Skill |
|
Contextual Interference
|
The Memory and Performance:
- Disruption/Interference - Results from Performing Multiple Skills/Variation of Skills - In the Context of Practice |
|
Contextual Interference Effect
|
The Learning Benefit Resulting From:
- Performing Multiple Skills in - High Contextual Interference Practice Schedule (Random Practice) - Rather than Low Contextual Interference Practice (Blocked Practice) |
|
Specificity of Practice Hypothesis
|
Motor Skill Learning by Practice Conditioning Characteristics
- Especially Sensory/Perceptual Information - Performance Context Characteristics - Cognitive Processes Available |
|
Variable Practice Benefits
|
Superior:
- Retention - Transfer - Motor Skill Learning |
|
Determining Characteristics of Practice
|
Identify:
- Regulatory - Non-regulatory - Of Practice |
|
Purpose of Contextual Interface Effect
|
A Basis of Scheduling variety for Practice
- Applies to both Beginners and Skilled |
|
Explanation of Contextual Interface Effect
|
Elaboration Hypothesis
Action Plan Reconstruction Hypothesis |
|
Elaboration Hypothesis
|
Proposed the Contextual Interface Effect is Related to:
- Elaboration of Memory Representation - Of a Skill Variations that the Learner is Practicing |
|
Action Plan Reconstruction Hypothesis
|
States that:
- High Amounts of Contextual Interface - Benefits Learning - Due to Interference Causing a - Reconstruction of an Action Plan - On the Next Practice Trial - For a Particular Skill Variation |
|
Overlearning
|
Practice that Continues:
- Beyond the Amount Needed to Achieve Performance Criterion |
|
Massed Practice
|
A Practice Schedule in which the:
- Amount of Rest Between Practice/Trails Sessions - Are VERY SHORT |
|
Distributed Practice
|
A Practice Schedule in which the:
- Amount of Rest Between Practice/Trails is - Relatively Long - Determined by Length and Frequency of Practice Sessions |
|
Three Reasons to Distribute Practice Across Days
|
1. Fatigue
2. Cognitive Effort 3. Memory Consolidation |
|
Fatigue (Practice Distribution)
|
- Negatively Effects Practice
|
|
Cognitive Effort (Practice Distribution)
|
Increased Volume and Proximity of Practice Reduces the amount of:
- Cognitive Effort - Becomes to Repetitive and Monotonous |
|
Memory Consolidation (Practice Distribution)
|
- Long-Term Memory Storage Process
- To store skill information to memory - Neuro-Biochemical process must occur - To Store, the Brain needs time to rest w/o additional practice of the Same Skill |
|
Length of Intertrial Interval
|
Rest period Between Practice Trails
- Best between Continuous and Discrete |
|
Complexity
|
The Number of:
- Parts/Components - Information-Processing - Characterize Skill More Complex = Component Pars (visa-verca) |
|
Organization
|
Applied to a Complex Motor Skill:
- Relationships Between Components of a Skill |
|
Fractionization
|
Part Task Training Method Related to:
- Asymmetric Coordination Skills - Involve Practicing Each Arm/Leg Separately - Before Performing them Together |
|
Segmentation
|
Part Task Training Method Involving:
- Separating the Skill Into Parts - Practicing the Parts - Then Practicing them Together - Repeat AKA: "Progressive Part Method" |
|
Simplification
|
Part Task Training Method Involving:
- Reducing the Difficulty of Separate Parts/Features - Of a Skill |
|
Mental Practice
|
Cognitive Rehearsal of:
- Physical Skill w/o Physical Movement Thinking About: - Cognitive/Procedural Aspects of a Motor Skill Engaging in: - Visual/Kinesthetic Imagery of the Performance of - A skill/part of a Skill Use with Regular Physical Practice |
|
Imagery Ability
|
Individual-Difference Characteristic
- Differentiates People who can - Imagine action with a - High Degree of Vividness and Control - vs. People who Have Difficulties |
|
Three Hypothesis for Mental Practice Effectiveness
|
1. Neuromuscular Hypothesis
2. Brain Activity Hypothesis 3. Cognitive Hypothesis |
|
Neuromuscular Practice (Mental Practice)
|
Based on EMG Readings:
- In Muscles that WOULD BE Involved in the Actual Physical Performance of Imagined Skill |
|
Brain Activity Hypothesis (Mental Practice)
|
Similar Brain Regions:
- Activated during the Imagery of a Movement - As with the Physical Execution of that Movement Support: Brain Imagery |
|
Cognitive Hypothesis (Mental Practice)
|
Answers the Question:
- What to Do - First Stage of Motor Learning |