Morality Grade 11

Front 1

Utilitarianism is willing to sacrifice the good of the minority for the good of the majority

Back 1

true

Front 2

a benefit of moral relativism is that you avoid pain and seek pleasure

Back 2

false

Front 3

a moral relativist from one culture may view a moral decision differently than a moral relativist from another culture

Back 3

true

Front 4

a hedonist is generally concerned with whether or not a given action conforms the moral good

Back 4

false

Front 5

a moral nihilist finds no value in the lives of other, but does find value in his/her existence

Back 5

true

Front 6

a utilitarian would agree with the following statement: it is never morally okay to place value on the worth of one human's life over another

Back 6

false

Front 7

a limitation of utilitarianism is that using it one can justify actions that are wrong as long as the end is desirable

Back 7

true

Front 8

tolerance for other's views necessitates holding a position of moral relativism

Back 8

true

Front 9

moral nihilism denies the existence of inherently good or bad actions at all

Back 9

true

Front 10

moral absolutism judges the morality based on the action itself as right or wrong

Back 10

true

Front 11

utilitarianism judges something as moral or not based on the action itself and not the outcome

Back 11

false

Front 12

one's view of a particular moral dilemma will be shaped by the moral vision that one holds

Back 12

true

Front 13

all people, consciously or unconsciously, live by a particular vision that one holds

Back 13

true

Front 14

both jeremy bentham and john stuart mill contributed to the ideas of moral relativism, specifically separating higher from lower goods

Back 14

false

Front 15

there are three distinct steps in moral relativism: descriptive, Meta-ethical, normative

Back 15

true

Front 16

a moral relativist would agree with this statement : morals are best 'best explanations' of an individual experience and one with another experience could come to a different 'best explanation'

Back 16

true

Front 17

a limitation of hedonism is that it leaves the person incapable of making a decision in many moral decisions

Back 17

false

Front 18

in a utilitarian vision of the world the means justify the ends

Back 18

false

Front 19

hedonism seeks the true happiness of the individual

Back 19

false

Front 20

it is only considered a sin when a person takes an active role; when a person neglects doing the good it is not considered a sin

Back 20

false

Front 21

the truest forms of love are completely free and require no sacrifice of the soul on the part of anyone

Back 21

false

Front 22

a person's dignity comes from the fact that he/she was created in the image and likeness of God

Back 22

true

Front 23

sin is the foundation of Catholic morality

Back 23

false

Front 24

the process if divinization is about seeking forgiveness through reconciliation

Back 24

true