Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
38 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
WBJ believes that communication occurs _____ and ______
|
Unconsciously, unintentionally
|
|
WBJ believes that the meaning behind communication comes from
|
INTERPRETATION
|
|
According to WBJ, one __ ___ communicate
|
cannot NOT
|
|
According to WBJ, communication is always ___ and ___ as well as verbal
|
nonverbal and contextual
|
|
According to WBJ, communication has a content and contextual level, and _____ joins the two
|
metacommunication
|
|
What does sequential mean when referring to WBJ's views of communication
|
The meaning of each turn is affected by what came before it, and affects what comes after it
|
|
What is this an example of?
"don't take this personally, but..." |
metacommunication
|
|
What are the two weaknesses of WBJ's argument?
|
-THere is a physical world out there (i.e. hiccups, gravity, etc.) that is meaning-free
-There are pathologies (mental illnesses) out there (EX: John HInckley watching Taxi and trying to kill ronald regan) |
|
According to Miller, ______ is central to communication
|
intention
|
|
According to Miller,
___ = meaning |
intention
|
|
People may lie about their intentions, so outsiders must be the judges.
Who would agree with this? |
Miller
|
|
what is the weakness of miller?
|
Outside of a laboratory context
(i.e. most of the time), only the speaker gets to proclaim what something means. |
|
WbJ bElIeVeS iN:
Miller believes in: |
InTeRpReTaTiOn
intention |
|
According to Tracy and Robles, a _____ is a social meaning of a unit of talk
|
speech act
|
|
____ is right in the middle between intention and interpretation
|
speech acts
|
|
"Do the wobble" is meant to remind you that
|
You DO the wobble, you don't THINK it or INTEND it. intending something is not the same as doing something
|
|
communication is _____, utterances don't mean anything by themselves
|
SEQUENTIAL
|
|
would WBJ agree that a "Freudian slip" doesn't mean a blessed thing because it is unintentional?
|
NO
|
|
_____ is anything that tells you how to understand the content of your communication
|
metacommunication
|
|
______ level means the literal meaning of something
|
content
|
|
_____ level means how communication should be interpreted
|
relational
|
|
You use ____ signals to help differentiate content and relational level from a teacher saying "you seem a little sleepy today"
|
nonverbal
|
|
______refers to how everyday talk practices support or challenge one or the other party’s image
|
facework
|
|
what are the two kinds of facework?
|
face threat and face redress
|
|
what are three types of face threats?
|
advice, reproach, commands and requests
|
|
what is the face redress speech act that makes an attempt to repair social trouble?
|
accounts
|
|
What is the face redress speech act that offers metacommunication about your intentions?
|
disclaimers
|
|
Which face redress speech act is this an example of?
"I'm so sorry I completely spaced out" |
account
|
|
which face redress speech act is this an example of?
"I was just kidding!." used for unacceptably hostile situations |
disclaimer
|
|
_____ is civilized hostility
|
humor
|
|
How are indirectness and humor similar????
|
Indirectness and humor are both complicated speech acts. Indirectness can make a speech act very difficult to interpret, and humor can complicate relationships enormously; they both have important relational factors
|
|
what are the advantages of directness?
|
helps with clarity and mutual knowledge may be created
|
|
what are the advantages of indirectness?
|
benefit of face redress,
|
|
what are the disadvantages of directness?
|
risk of face threat,
|
|
what are the disadvantages of indirectness?
|
sensitive information may be kept out of view, and it risks confusion about intention (whether real or pretend)
|
|
Whose theory does this define?
Ownership is negotiated between the speaker and the listener |
WBJ
|
|
Whose theory does this describe?
Meaning (ownership) is entirely determined upon the speaker and there is no negotiation involved |
MIller
|
|
Whose theory does this describe?
in regular talk we alternate between intention and interpretation seamlessly based on what speech act is happening. |
Tracy and Robles
|