Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
30 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Definition of Learning
|
a change in behavior acquired through experience
|
|
Positive and Negative Consequences
|
Positive Consequences-
Results of a behavior that a person finds attractive or pleasurable Negative Consequences Results of a behavior that a person finds unattractive or aversive |
|
Reinforcement
|
the attempt to develop or strengthen desirable behavior by either bestowing positive consequences or withholding negative consequences
|
|
Punishment
|
the attempt to eliminate or weaken undesirable behavior by either bestowing negative consequences or withholding positive consequences
|
|
Extinction
|
the attempt to weaken a behavior by attaching no consequences to it
|
|
Reinforcement and
Punishment Strategies
|
2x2 Box
Across: Reinforcement (Desirable Behavior) Punishment (Undesirable Behavior) Down: Positive Consequences Negative Consequences Clockwise Decisions from Top left: Apply, Withhold, Withhold, Apply |
|
Bandura’s Social Learning Theory
|
Prior Experiences
Behavior Models Persuasion from Others Assessment of Current Physical & Emotional Capabilities |
|
Task-Specific Self-Efficacy
|
an individual’s beliefs and expectancies about his or her ability to perform a specific task effectively
|
|
Goal Setting
|
the process of establishing desired results that guide and direct behavior
|
|
Characteristics of Effective Goals
|
SMART Goals: Smart, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic, Time-Bound
|
|
Goal Level and
Task Performance
|
Graph:
Down High Low Goal Level Low High Upward Diagonal Slope Easy goals--> Difficult goals |
|
Goal-Setting Functions
|
Increase work motivation and
task performance
Reduce role stress associated with conflicting or confusing situations Improve accuracy and validity of performance evaluation |
|
Increase Work Motivation & Task Performance
|
Employee participation
Supervisory commitment Useful performance feedback |
|
Reduce Role Stress
|
Reduce role stress associated
with conflicting and confusing expectations
Clarify task-role expectations communicated to employees Improve communication between managers and employees |
|
Management by Objectives (MBO)
[Improve Performance Evaluation] |
a goal-setting program based on interaction and negotiation between employees and managers
Articulates what to do Determines how to do it |
|
Performance Management
|
a process of defining, measuring, appraising, providing feedback on, and improving performance
|
|
Performance appraisal
[How is Performance Measured?] |
the evaluation of a person’s performance
Provides feedback to employees Identifies employees’ developmental needs Decides promotions and rewards Decides demotions and terminations Develops information about the organization’s selection and placement decisions |
|
Actual & Measured Performance (General)
|
Venn Diagram
Left: Actual Performance Right: Measured Performance Middle: True Assessment |
|
Actual & Measured Performance (Detailed)
|
Venn Diagram
Left: Deficiency-Performance overlooked by evaluator [Actual Performance] Right: Unreliability- Evaluator’s situational factors, Disagreement Employee’s temporary personal factors Invalidity: Poorly defined task performance [Measured Performance] Middle: True Assessment |
|
Communicating
Performance Feedback
|
Refer to specific verbatim statements
and observable behaviors
Focus on changeable behaviors Both supervisor and employee should plan and organize before the session Begin with something positive |
|
360-Degree Feedback
|
A process of self-evaluation and evaluations by a manager, peers, direct reports, and possibly customers
Feedback: Manager Evaluation Self Evaluation Customer Evaluation Reports Peer Evaluation |
|
Effective Appraisal Systems
|
Key Characteristics: Validity
Reliability Responsiveness Flexibility Equitableness |
|
Correcting Poor Performance
|
Identify primary cause or responsibility--> If organizational/personal,
determine problem’s
source --> Develop corrective plan of action
|
|
Attribution Theory
[Attribution in Organizations] |
explains how individuals pinpoint the causes of their own and others’ behavior
|
|
Consensus
[Attribution in Organizations] |
the extent to which peers in the same situation behave the same way
|
|
Distinctiveness
[Attribution in Organizations] |
the degree to which the person behaves the same way in other situations
|
|
Consistency
[Attribution in Organizations] |
the frequency of a particular behavior over time
|
|
Information Cues and Attributions (Customer Complains About John)
|
Customer has complained
about John --(3)--> 1. There are no complaints about other employees (low consensus) 2. John has received similar complaints in the past (low distinctiveness) --Internal attribution (John's behavior stems mainly from internal causes) 3. Complaints about John have been coming in steady (high consistency) |
|
Information Cues and Attributions
(Mary has performed poorly on collections) |
Mary has performed
poorly on collections--(3)--> 1. Other employees are performing poorly on collections (high consensus) 2. Mary only performs poorly on this task (high distinctiveness)-- External attribution (Mary's behavior stems mainly from external causes) 3. Most of the time Mary handles collections well (low consistency) |
|
Attribution Model
|
Observation
of poor performance---> --v Information cues Consensus Consistency Distinctiveness --> Attribution of poor performance Internal causes External causes --v Perceived source of responsibility --> Behavior in response to attribution |