• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/17

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

17 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
  • 3rd side (hint)

MULTI STORE MODEL OF MEMORY

Atkinson and Shiffrin



•sensory memory, STM, LTM


•emphasises that STM and LTM are two different stores


•suggests there is a vital process of rehearsal (repeating material to be remembered) - acts as a buffer, keeps information looping round so it can be passed on



1. External stimulus enters sensory memory - give attention or leave to decay


2. Attention: stimulus passes on to STM encoded acoustically


3. Memory traces are fragile in STM so information decays or displaces after 18s


4. Rehearsed: Passed onto LTM, encoded semantically - remembered up to a lifetime or may experience decay, retrieval failure or interference

Evaluation of MSM

...2

Working Model of Memory

System allowing different types of information to be held at the same time.



Central executive:


•overall control


•limited capacity


•performs few tasks at a time


•deals with cognitive demands


•supported by 2 systems



Phonological loop:


•temporarily stores speech based info


•linked to articulatory loop


•maintains info by repetition


•characterised as the inner voice



Visuo spatial sketchpad:


•temporarily holds visual and spatial info


•has a visual cache


•characterised as inner store



Primary acoustic store:


•very little known


•stores information in acoustic code


•auditory information directly from ears



Together these components work together to form the Working Model of Memory.

Evaluation of WMM

• influential - psychologists use the term working memory rather than STM



• more plausible than MSM - explains STM as a temporary storage



• support from clinical studies:


KF suffered from brain damage but could still transfer information to LTM and recall it.


Only part of STM is damaged



•Baddeley et al showed that the phonological loop is not operative in children with dyslexia, used as a recruitment tool for US AIR FORCE



- lacks evidence for central executive and LTM:


Cowan said WMM should encompass LTM in terms of working memory.



- Berz criticised as people are able to listen to music and still perform other tasks



- doesn't justify complexity and ability of memory

Effects of Age on EWT:


Poole and Lindsay

Children more susceptible to post information and suggestion


Poole and Lindsay


3-8 engaged in science demo


Parents read story - some novel and some science information


Questioned about science demo


Found that they remembered the new information


Asked to think where they got the information from


Older children gave an account of the science demo - younger children couldn't do this




Effects of Age on EWT:


Yarmey

Children are more confident in recall


•Yarmey


Young woman stopped 651 participants on the street and talked for 15 seconds


2 minutes later, they were stopped again and asked to recall her characteristics


All age groups performed similarly but the younger age groups were more confident in recall

Effects of Age on EWT


Own Age Bias

• Anastasi and Rhodes


3 age groups


Shown 24 photos of people of a mixture of ages


48 photos shown - 24 same as earlier


Had to identify the 24 photos from earlier


Younger and Middle Aged groups performed similarly


But all groups were better at recognising people in their own age group

Effects of Age on EWT


Parker and Carranza

More errors in identification


Parker and Carranza


Compared ability of primary school children and college students to identify a person from a mock crime


Photo identification task


Children had a higher rate of choosing someone than college witnesses


Made more error than college students

Anxiety and EWT


Loftus and Burns

Violent video of crime


Boy shot in the face


Non-violent video of crime



Participants shown violent video of crime had significantly impaired recall of events leading up to crime


Anxiety and EWT


LOFTUS

Participants asked to sit outside lab


Control group heard a discussion on equipment failure and a man came out holding a greasy pen


Other group heard argument, overturned furniture and a man came out holding a bloody knife


Given 50 photos to identify man



Those who witnessed a more peaceful scene (control) were more accurate



Anxiety elicited the weapon, taking attention away from the man

Anxiety and EWT


CHRISTIANSON AND HUBINETTE

110 witnesses questioned about 22 real bank robberies



Victims were more accurate in recall


They could recall the robber's clothes, behaviour


This was still evident after 15 months

Anxiety and EWT


YUILLE AND CUTSHALL

13 witnesses interviewed about real life shooting


Store owner was wounded and thief was shot



Accurate accounts were given several months later


Witnesses closer to the event gave more detail


Misleading questions asked had no effect



People are good at recalling stressful events - especially witnesses - IF THEY OCCUR IN REAL LIFE and NOT IN ARTIFICIAL SURROUNDINGS

Misleading Information and EWT


LOFTUS' BARN STUDY

Film of events shown leading up to a car crash


Control group asked consistent questions


Experimental group were asked a misleading question "HOW FAST WAS THE WHITE SPORTS CAR GOING WHEN IT PASSED THE BARN?"


There was no barn



17% of experimental group made this error


3% of control group made this error



Participants absorbed misleading information into original memory

Barn

Misleading Information and EWT


LOFTUS AND PALMER

45 participants shown film of car accident


Asked series of questions of events leading up to car accident


Main question was:


"How fast were the cars going when they hit each other?"


Other groups were asked the same question but the verb hit was replaced with smashed, bumped and collided



Smashed produced the highest estimate of 40.8mph

HIT / BUMPED / SMASHED ETC

Misleading Information and EWT


LOFTUS AND ZANNI

Investigated whether minor differences in wording influences recall



Shown brief clip of accident


Asked if they had seen "a broken headlight" or "the broken headlight"


There was no broken headlight



17% saw the broken headlight


7% saw a broken headlight

A or The

Method of Loci

Imagine a set of familiar places


Imagine walking through it


Convert each item you want to remember and mentally place it in a location


Location acts as a retrieval clues



+Lawrence found that participants could recall 95% of a 40 word list



- not good for remember complex information therefore lacks ecological validity

Peg word method

Pegs act as retrieval clues


Learn set of objects and rhyme with number


Eg. 1 is gun, 2 is shoe, 3 is tree


Convert item to image and imagine it interacting with peg word



+Morris found that two times more words recalled


+useful to remember lists



- limited use to real life therefore lacks ecological validity


- only certain words can be used