• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/27

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

27 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
uses previous cases which are representative, to reach moral conclusions
casuistry
addresses these areas of concern: abstract, over generalization and focuses on those involved in the case rather than on the preferences of the clinician
casuistry
a system of ethics based on the foru moral principles of autonomy; normalefience, beneficence, justice
principlism
to do good
non malefience
free will or agency
autonomy
not to harm
beneficence
social distribution of benefits and burdens
justice
a method of working out the sum total of pleasure and pain produced by an act, and thus the total value of its consequences
consequentialism
the right action is the one that produces the most intrinsic good
utiltarianism/consequentialism
treatment is no longer beneficial to the patient
futility
does a physician have an ethical duty to disclose futility
yes
in mediating disputes with surrogates, treat until when
the dispute is resolved, except when treatment is harmful to patient or it becomes futility
what is the most obvious ethical justification for withholding or withdrawing decisions
efficacy or futility of treatment
is there any moral obligation to perform useless or futile treatments
no
is there a moral obligation to continue life dependent on technology
no
standard, due measure
justice
a group of norms for distributing benefits, risks and costs fairly; treating similar cases similar
justice
what two conditions must be met to have autonomy
liberty and agency
independence from controlling influences
liberty
acting above and beyond the call of duty
supererogation
directly and specifically given
expressed consent
reasonably assumed from conduct
implied consent
Jus ad Bellum
the justice of War . Justification for resorting to force as a means of achieving political objectives
justice in war; consideration of how a war is prosecuted. Who? by what means? treatment of prisoners?
Jus in Bello
what w ought to do or be and defines and distinguishes between right and wrong
normative ethics
description of how people do act or think they should act
non normative ethics
there might be info that if we give it to the pt might put them over the edge or at grave risk
therapeutic privilege