• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/3

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

3 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
  • 3rd side (hint)

What is the degree of annexation test?

The greater degree of attachment the more likely to be a fixture

Holland v Hodgson (1872), although look at Hulme v Brigham (1943) - item immovable due to own weight still chattel!

What is the purpose of annexation test?

Does the object enhance the land or is it for personal benefit?

Compare Leigh v Taylor (1902) with Re Whaley (1908) - both concerning tapestries but why different outcomes? Also look at D'Eyncourt v Gregory (1866) - garden ornaments and Botham v TSB Bank plc (1996) - modern household items. Would removal damage fabric of building? Common sense approach - Elitestone v Morris (1997)

When does the law allow a right to remove fixtures?

1) Tenants trade fixtures


2) Ornamental and domestic fixtures - only if wont cause substantial damage


3) Agricultural fixtures


4) Fixtures pass to mortgagee even if not mentioned in deed


5) Between life tenant and remainder men (pass to freeholder)