Mcculloch V. Maryland To Constituency

Front 1

McCULLOCH V. MARYLAND

Back 1

MARYLAND WANTED TO IMPOSE TAXES ON THE BANK OF THE U.S., BUT JUDGE MARSHAL CONCLUDED THAT THE CONSTITUTION IS SUPREME AND U.S GOVT CAN'T BE CONTROLLED BY STATES BECAUSE OF CONGRESS'S UNENUMERATED POWERS

1819- Upheld constitutionality of the Bank of the US; example of loose construction of the Constitution (favored by Feds)

Front 2

POLITICO

Back 2

ATTEMPTS TO MEET THE NEEDS OF THE TRUSTEE, DELEGATE, AND PARTISAN ROLES

Front 3

PARTISAN

Back 3

LAWMAKER THAT VOTES ACCORDING TO THE PARTY

Front 4

TRUSTEE

Back 4

LAWMAKER THAT VOTES ACCORDING TO HIS/HER OWN BELIEF

Front 5

SINGLE MEMBER DISTRICTS

Back 5

ELECTORAL DISTRICT WHERE ONE PERSON IS CHOSEN BY THE VOTERS FOR EACH ELECTED OFFICE

Front 6

LIBERAL CONSTRUCTIONIST

Back 6

GOES BY A LOOSE INTERPRETATION OF THE CONSTITUTION

Front 7

STRICT CONSTRUCTIONIST

Back 7

GOES BY A STRICT INTERPRETATION OF THE CONSTITUTION

Front 8

COMMERCE POWER

Back 8

EXCLUSIVE POWER OF CONGRESS TO REGULATE INTERSTATE AND FOREIGN TRADE

Front 9

DEFICIT FINANCING

Back 9

GOVERNMENT FUNDING THAT BORROWS TO MAKE UP THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GOVERNMENT SPENDING AND REVENUE

Front 10

GERRYMANDER

Back 10

REDRAWING ELECTORAL DISTRICT LINES TO HELP A PARTY OR GROUP

Front 11

APPORTION

Back 11

DISTRIBUTION OF SEATS (HOUSE/SENATE)

Front 12

CONTINUOUS BODY

Back 12

U.S SENATE; ALL OF THE SEATS ARE NEVER UP FOR REELECTION AT THE SAME TIME; ONLY 1/3 ARE

Front 13

INCUMBENT

Back 13

THE CURRENT OFFICE HOLDER

Front 14

INTEREST GROUPS

Back 14

MEMBERS SHARE CERTAIN VIEWS AND WORK TO SHAPE POLICY; PRIVATE ORANIZATION

Front 15

POLLING

Back 15

WHERE VOTERS OF CERTAIN PRECINCTS GO TO VOTE

Front 16

CONSTITUENCY

Back 16

THE PEOPLE AND INTERESTS REPRESENTED BY AN ELECTED OFFICIAL