Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
13 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
What are the required factors for a consent search to be valid?
|
(1) the person consenting
must have the authority to consent to a search of the premises; (2) the person's consent to the search must be voluntary; and (3) the police may not exceed their search into areas for which consent to a search has not been given. |
|
What are the requirements to search a vehicle without a warrant pursuant to the "Automobile Exception?"
|
Must have probable cause to suspect, or reasonably
believe that the vehicle contains evidence of the crime. The police must have a reasonable or articulable suspicion to believe that the car contained evidence of a crime. |
|
What is required in order for police to search the trunk area of, and locked containers within, an automobile?
|
Once probable cause to search exists (such as finding of drugs in passenger area), police can search the entire vehicle, including closed containers.
Key: the scope is determined by the "OBJECT" of the search. United States v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798 (1982) |
|
What determines the scope of an automobile search under the Automobile Exception to the search warrant requirement?
|
Rule:
If "probable cause justifies the search of a lawfully stopped vehicle, it justifies the search of every part of the vehicle and its contents that may conceal the object of the search." Key: scope is determined by what the police have probable cause to look for, or the "OBJECT" of the search. Example: If the police had probable cause to search the entire vehicle for drugs, the police may lawfully search both a locked toolbox, as well as the glove compartment, or any other area of the vehicle in which drugs may be concealed. United States v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798 (1982) |
|
Does the "Separate Sovereignties Doctrine" apply to trials by a state and its municipalities?
|
No.
Applies only as against Federal to State trials, and state to state trials. |
|
What are the 4 Specific Bases with which to attack the admissibility of a statement or confession?
|
(1) the Miranda standard;
(2) the right to counsel approach; (3) the voluntariness approach; and (4) fruits of illegal conduct. |
|
What are the limitations of a warrantless administrative airport search?
|
Stops may be made (as a result of drug sniffing dogs or undercover police narcotics agents w/ reasonable suspicion), HOWEVER:
any resulting detention must be BRIEF, and a seizure of any luggage is subject to 4th Amendment limitations. |
|
When will a prior un-mirandized statement lead to the inadmissibility of a subsequent mirandized statement?
|
A police officer's intentional, bad-faith decision to interrogate a suspect in custody without first giving the required Miranda warnings, which produced a confession followed by Miranda warnings, renders a second post-Miranda confession also inadmissible.
|
|
What factors does the court balance in determining whether a pre-trial delay is reasonable?
|
Court balances the following 4 factors:
1. The length of the delay; 2. The good faith and justification of the delay; 3. The defendant's assertion of the right to a speedy trial; and 4. Prejudice to the defendant |
|
For what types of punishment does a person have an absolute right to counsel?
|
Anytime there is a possibility of jail time, no matter how brief.
|
|
For what types of punishment does a defendant have a right to a jury trial?
|
Whenever accused faces jail time of possibly MORE than 6 months.
|
|
What is required for a 3d party to have "apparent authority" to consent to a search?
|
Some indicia of apparent authority must exist in order to form a reasonable belief that person had authority to consent.
Simply being the one who answers the door is NOT SUFFICIENT to yield apparent authority. Factors: having a key, knowing where things are stored, stating that they live there, etc. |
|
Does drug testing of students constitute a "search" under the 4th Amendment?
|
Yes.
HOWEVER - such testing is valid, and is not an intrusion upon their reasonable expectation of privacy. |