Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
55 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
undifferentiated marketing
|
targeting entire market as a whole
|
|
differentiated marketing
|
each company targets a different segment
|
|
concentrated marketing
|
company chooses to go after a certain segment
|
|
product position
|
place a product occupies in a customer's mind relative to competing products
ex: volvo = safety |
|
perceptual map
|
pain reliever example from slides
chart with gentleness on y axis and effectiveness on x axis |
|
positioning components
|
convince -- customer target
competitive framework -- in context of other alternatives value proposition -- benefits consumer receives reason to believe -- b/c we have these capabilities |
|
positioning statement
|
needs to be distinct, compelling, authentic, persausive, and sustainable
For [target] who [need statement], this [product] is a [product category] that [statement of key benefit]. Unlike [competitive alternatives] |
|
competitor analysis
|
1. identify: who are competitors today and in the future?
2. describe: competitors capabilities and difficulties? 3. evaluate: competitor's strategic options? 4. project: what we expect our competitors to do in S/T, M/T, L/T? 5. manage: how to get competitors to do what we want them to do? |
|
identifying competitors
|
BROADEST: competing for the same dollar
BROAD: products offering same benefits NARROWER: product category or industry NARROWEST: market segment competition |
|
direct competitors
|
people competing in same industry with same products in similar segment
|
|
indirect competitors
|
different industries competing for the same dollar
|
|
differential competitive advantage analysis
|
questions about each competitor:
1. capability to deliver required benefits? 2. in which areas do competitors have greater capability than we do? 3. in areas of deficit, would it be possible for us to match competitors? 4. is competitor delivering superior value proposition to client? |
|
assessing individual competitors
|
SWOT
sources of competitive advantage: cost, differentiation, marketing market share |
|
value mapping
|
x axis: perceived benefits
y-axis: perceived costs value equivalence line: superior = above; inferior = below - economy, parity, premium |
|
strategic objectives
|
market share (L/T) vs. profits (S/T)
|
|
strategic options
|
core strategy for each product/service
1. customer targets: - broad vs. narrow - segments you are going after 2. competitor targets: - are we a target? - how should we position |
|
managing competitors
|
- preemptive signals
- warning signals - tit for tat - misinformation |
|
how to create value
|
FUNCTIONAL: performance
SELF-EXPRESSIVE: identifying with something EMOTIONAL: ex: hallmark |
|
how VRD mfg. creates value
|
core products
actual products augmented products |
|
augmented products
|
ex: Otis elevator makes money off elevator services products, not elevator sales
ex: Baxter Hospital provides ordering terminals on hospital floors -- important: lock in customer relationships |
|
brand equity
|
a set of assets, such as:
- awareness - perceived quality - loyalty - associations these add/subtract to value of product these are linked to brand name and symbol |
|
brand personality structure
|
sincerity
excitement sophistication ruggedness competence |
|
managing brand portfolio
|
SEE SLIDES
relative mkt. share (H to L) -- x-axis mkt. growth rate (H to L) -- y-axis - STARS: high growth and mkt. share; profit potential; may need heavy investment to grow - QUESTION MARKS: high growth, low mkt. share; build into stars/phase out; requires cash to hold mkt. share - CASH COWS: low growth, high mkt. share; est., successful SBUs; produces cash - DOGS: low growth and share, low profit potential evolution: Q/M -- stars -- C/C movement of resources: C/C -- Q/M |
|
differences b/t products and services
|
services = intangibility, inseparability, variability, perishability, divisibility -- SEE CH. 18
|
|
changes in marketing
|
used to be mainly about distribution
CHANGES: now... - transportation, communication make location less important - new channels = internet - "walmartization" -- more concentrated dist. |
|
intermediary vs. no imtermediary
|
SEE SLIDES AND BOOK
|
|
dist. decisions
|
- dist. intensity
- # of channels - # of channel levels |
|
dist. intensity
|
- having many outlets increases ease of consumers getting access to products
- can also reduce exclusivity - these can hurt margins EXCLUSIVE: one reseller per trading area; strong reseller support; no intra-brand competition SELECTIVE: limited amt. of resellers per trading area, moderate re-seller support and intra-brand competition; INTENSIVE: max. amt. of resellers per trading area; low reseller support; high intra-brand competition |
|
simple pricing approaches
|
cost recovery -- cost plus pricing
matching competitors --competitive parity or going rate pricing targeting spec. profit level -- B/E pricing |
|
value-based pricing
|
best approach
setting price based on buyer's perception of value instead of customer's cost depends on: user characteristics/goals; usage situation, perceived benefits |
|
pricing strategies
|
skim pricing: use for inelastic demand; for patented products -- hard to duplicate; S/T profit objective; price is surrogate for quality
penetration pricing: use for elastic demand -- est. mkt.; low barriers to entry; economies of scale/learning curve effect; desire to gain pioneering advantage |
|
pricing strategies
|
depend on mkt. structure
|
|
market structures that ensure mkt. power
|
diff. product mkt.:primary pricing concern has to do with CWP rather than competitors; ex: iPod
dominant with cost leadership: primary concern deals with economies of scale and preventing entry; ex: Southwest |
|
value based pricing is easy if
|
all consumers place essentially same value on product
|
|
if CWPs are different
|
may not be able to recover FC with uniform pricing -- discriminate
|
|
price discrimination
|
different prices for different people; different versions
|
|
price discrimination vs. bundling
|
can achieve the same goal
price discrimination: - personalized: sell to each user at a diff. price - versioning: offer diff. product lines and let user choose best for him/her - group pricing: diff. pricing for diff. groups; ex: student or senior discounts bundling: equalizing customers valuation so you can charge everyone a single price |
|
bundling examples
|
- across products: ex. - microsoft, comcast
- across consumers: ex. - licenses at GA tech - across time: subscriptions |
|
is marketing game static?
|
no -- multiple periods
|
|
marketing game steps
|
1. analyze company results
2. plan and budget 3. make marketing decision 4. submit it to t-square 5. marketing game simulation 6. retrieve reports from t-square |
|
6 key segments of the marketing game
|
smallest to largest:
- concerned parents - professional creators - home users - modern students - high tech managers - harried assistants |
|
marketing game distribution channels
|
traditional dealers -- full service
discount dealers -- internet and mail order |
|
marketing game product
|
VRD: voice recognition device
key features: - # of special commands (5-20) - error protection (1-10) - ability to customize (1-10) |
|
marketing game market research reports
|
mkt. share by seg. (all brands)
mkt. share by channel (all brands) consumer preference study marketing effectiveness report sales segment by channel (own brand) consumer shopping habits study |
|
purpose of advertising in TMG
|
helps pioneer the mkt. by building awareness
may helps firms other than the one that is advertising direct advertising is best for firm to gain mkt. share pioneer advertising is not necessarily useful for promoting new features that differ from other brands effects mkt. share, growth low levels of spending create very little impact effectiveness can depend on ad choices of competition |
|
error protection in TMG
|
customers have different preferences on this feature
|
|
largest unit sales volume in TMG
|
does not always mean it is the most profitable target mkt.
|
|
excess inventory in TMG
|
sold overseas for amt. = to 85% of unit cost
|
|
product life cycle of VRD in TMG
|
in growth stage at the beginning of the game
|
|
marketing plan decisions form in TMG
|
level of product features
amt. of sales reps. to be allocated across channels wholesale price which reports to purchase DOES NOT include which segments to target |
|
what marketing budget pays for in TMG
|
R&D for modifications
sales force salaries marketing research advertising costs COMMISSIONS ARE NOT! |
|
increasing dist. in TMG
|
amt. of sales rep. should increase as intensity increases
|
|
sales promotion in TMG
|
more effective at creating ST responses than LT respsonses
sales reps. sell to dealers but not final customers |
|
decisions under control of manager in TMG
|
wholesale price
level of product features marketing research reports to buy amt. to spend on customer serive salaries of sales force NOT under control of mgt. |
|
features customers do not care if they get more of in TMG
|
amt. of special commands
error protection ease of learning |