• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/55

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

55 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
undifferentiated marketing
targeting entire market as a whole
differentiated marketing
each company targets a different segment
concentrated marketing
company chooses to go after a certain segment
product position
place a product occupies in a customer's mind relative to competing products

ex: volvo = safety
perceptual map
pain reliever example from slides

chart with gentleness on y axis and effectiveness on x axis
positioning components
convince -- customer target

competitive framework -- in context of other alternatives

value proposition -- benefits consumer receives

reason to believe -- b/c we have these capabilities
positioning statement
needs to be distinct, compelling, authentic, persausive, and sustainable

For [target] who [need statement], this [product] is a [product category] that [statement of key benefit]. Unlike [competitive alternatives]
competitor analysis
1. identify: who are competitors today and in the future?

2. describe: competitors capabilities and difficulties?

3. evaluate: competitor's strategic options?

4. project: what we expect our competitors to do in S/T, M/T, L/T?

5. manage: how to get competitors to do what we want them to do?
identifying competitors
BROADEST: competing for the same dollar

BROAD: products offering same benefits

NARROWER: product category or industry

NARROWEST: market segment competition
direct competitors
people competing in same industry with same products in similar segment
indirect competitors
different industries competing for the same dollar
differential competitive advantage analysis
questions about each competitor:

1. capability to deliver required benefits?
2. in which areas do competitors have greater capability than we do?
3. in areas of deficit, would it be possible for us to match competitors?
4. is competitor delivering superior value proposition to client?
assessing individual competitors
SWOT

sources of competitive advantage: cost, differentiation, marketing

market share
value mapping
x axis: perceived benefits
y-axis: perceived costs

value equivalence line: superior = above; inferior = below

- economy, parity, premium
strategic objectives
market share (L/T) vs. profits (S/T)
strategic options
core strategy for each product/service

1. customer targets:
- broad vs. narrow
- segments you are going after

2. competitor targets:
- are we a target?
- how should we position
managing competitors
- preemptive signals
- warning signals
- tit for tat
- misinformation
how to create value
FUNCTIONAL: performance

SELF-EXPRESSIVE: identifying with something

EMOTIONAL: ex: hallmark
how VRD mfg. creates value
core products
actual products
augmented products
augmented products
ex: Otis elevator makes money off elevator services products, not elevator sales

ex: Baxter Hospital provides ordering terminals on hospital floors

-- important: lock in customer relationships
brand equity
a set of assets, such as:
- awareness
- perceived quality
- loyalty
- associations

these add/subtract to value of product

these are linked to brand name and symbol
brand personality structure
sincerity
excitement
sophistication
ruggedness
competence
managing brand portfolio
SEE SLIDES

relative mkt. share (H to L) -- x-axis
mkt. growth rate (H to L) -- y-axis

- STARS: high growth and mkt. share; profit potential; may need heavy investment to grow
- QUESTION MARKS: high growth, low mkt. share; build into stars/phase out; requires cash to hold mkt. share
- CASH COWS: low growth, high mkt. share; est., successful SBUs; produces cash
- DOGS: low growth and share, low profit potential

evolution: Q/M -- stars -- C/C

movement of resources: C/C -- Q/M
differences b/t products and services
services = intangibility, inseparability, variability, perishability, divisibility -- SEE CH. 18
changes in marketing
used to be mainly about distribution

CHANGES: now...
- transportation, communication make location less important
- new channels = internet
- "walmartization" -- more concentrated dist.
intermediary vs. no imtermediary
SEE SLIDES AND BOOK
dist. decisions
- dist. intensity
- # of channels
- # of channel levels
dist. intensity
- having many outlets increases ease of consumers getting access to products
- can also reduce exclusivity
- these can hurt margins

EXCLUSIVE: one reseller per trading area; strong reseller support; no intra-brand competition

SELECTIVE: limited amt. of resellers per trading area, moderate re-seller support and intra-brand competition;

INTENSIVE: max. amt. of resellers per trading area; low reseller support; high intra-brand competition
simple pricing approaches
cost recovery -- cost plus pricing

matching competitors --competitive parity or going rate pricing

targeting spec. profit level -- B/E pricing
value-based pricing
best approach

setting price based on buyer's perception of value instead of customer's cost

depends on: user characteristics/goals; usage situation, perceived benefits
pricing strategies
skim pricing: use for inelastic demand; for patented products -- hard to duplicate; S/T profit objective; price is surrogate for quality

penetration pricing: use for elastic demand -- est. mkt.; low barriers to entry; economies of scale/learning curve effect; desire to gain pioneering advantage
pricing strategies
depend on mkt. structure
market structures that ensure mkt. power
diff. product mkt.:primary pricing concern has to do with CWP rather than competitors; ex: iPod

dominant with cost leadership: primary concern deals with economies of scale and preventing entry; ex: Southwest
value based pricing is easy if
all consumers place essentially same value on product
if CWPs are different
may not be able to recover FC with uniform pricing -- discriminate
price discrimination
different prices for different people; different versions
price discrimination vs. bundling
can achieve the same goal

price discrimination:
- personalized: sell to each user at a diff. price
- versioning: offer diff. product lines and let user choose best for him/her
- group pricing: diff. pricing for diff. groups; ex: student or senior discounts

bundling: equalizing customers valuation so you can charge everyone a single price
bundling examples
- across products: ex. - microsoft, comcast

- across consumers: ex. - licenses at GA tech

- across time: subscriptions
is marketing game static?
no -- multiple periods
marketing game steps
1. analyze company results
2. plan and budget
3. make marketing decision
4. submit it to t-square
5. marketing game simulation
6. retrieve reports from t-square
6 key segments of the marketing game
smallest to largest:
- concerned parents
- professional creators
- home users
- modern students
- high tech managers
- harried assistants
marketing game distribution channels
traditional dealers -- full service

discount dealers -- internet and mail order
marketing game product
VRD: voice recognition device

key features:
- # of special commands (5-20)
- error protection (1-10)
- ability to customize (1-10)
marketing game market research reports
mkt. share by seg. (all brands)
mkt. share by channel (all brands)
consumer preference study
marketing effectiveness report
sales segment by channel (own brand)
consumer shopping habits study
purpose of advertising in TMG
helps pioneer the mkt. by building awareness

may helps firms other than the one that is advertising

direct advertising is best for firm to gain mkt. share

pioneer advertising is not necessarily useful for promoting new features that differ from other brands

effects mkt. share, growth

low levels of spending create very little impact

effectiveness can depend on ad choices of competition
error protection in TMG
customers have different preferences on this feature
largest unit sales volume in TMG
does not always mean it is the most profitable target mkt.
excess inventory in TMG
sold overseas for amt. = to 85% of unit cost
product life cycle of VRD in TMG
in growth stage at the beginning of the game
marketing plan decisions form in TMG
level of product features

amt. of sales reps. to be allocated across channels

wholesale price

which reports to purchase

DOES NOT include which segments to target
what marketing budget pays for in TMG
R&D for modifications
sales force salaries
marketing research
advertising costs

COMMISSIONS ARE NOT!
increasing dist. in TMG
amt. of sales rep. should increase as intensity increases
sales promotion in TMG
more effective at creating ST responses than LT respsonses

sales reps. sell to dealers but not final customers
decisions under control of manager in TMG
wholesale price
level of product features
marketing research reports to buy
amt. to spend on customer serive

salaries of sales force NOT under control of mgt.
features customers do not care if they get more of in TMG
amt. of special commands
error protection
ease of learning