Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
66 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Associative analysis |
Determine where stable relationships exist between two variables.
(Business associated with customer satisfaction, demographics associated with buying products, sales training associated with performance, purchase intention associated with sales) |
|
Relationship |
A consistent, systematic linkage between the levels/labels of two nominal variables. |
|
Levels |
Characteristics of description for interval or ratio scales (level of temp, etc.) |
|
Labels |
Characteristics of description for nominal or ordinal scales (buyers vs non buyers, etc.) |
|
Nonmonotonic |
Two variables are associated, but only in a very general sense. No direction but relationship exists.
Don't know direction of relationship, but we do know that the presence or absence of one variance is associated with the presence or absence of another.
(Ex. Presence of breakfast...presence of coffee. Presence of lunch...absence of coffee.) |
|
Monotonic |
The general direction of a relationship between two variables is known. Can either be increasing or decreasing. (Older children have a larger shoe size- direction increasing) |
|
Linear |
Straight line association between two variables. Knowledge of one variable will yield knowledge of another variable.
More precise than a monotonic or nonmonotonic relationship.
|
|
Linear formula and what each letter stands for |
y= a + bx
y= dependent variable being estimated or predicted. a= the intersect b= the slope x= independent variable used to predict the dependent variable. |
|
Curvilinear |
Some smooth curve pattern describes the association.
(Ex. Job satisfaction is high, then decreases, and later increases again.) |
|
3 ways to characterize relationships between variables |
1. Presence 2. Direction 3. Strength of association
*Asses in this order!!! |
|
Presence |
Whether any systematic relationship exists between two variables of interest.
(Statistical significance test) |
|
Direction |
Whether the relationship is positive or negative. Nonmonotonic looks for a pattern or a general relationship. |
|
Strength of association |
How strong the relationship is. Strong, moderate, or weak depending on correlation. |
|
6 steps for analyzing relationships |
1. Choose variable to analyze 2. Determine the scaling assumptions of the variable 3. Use correct relationship analysis 4. Presence 5. Direction 6. Strength of association |
|
Cross- tabulation |
Consists of rows and columns defined by the categories classifying each variable...Used for nonmonotonic relationships. |
|
4 types of numbers in each cell in a cross- tabulation table |
1. Frequency 2. Raw percentage 3. Column percentage 4. Row percentage |
|
Cross- tabs look for____________________________ among ______________________________. |
Nonmonotonic relationships among nominally- scaled variables. |
|
Commands to look for when using SPSS with cross- tabulation |
ANALYZE, DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS, CROSSTABS. |
|
What to do when we have two-nominally scaled variables and we want to know if they are associated? |
Use cross- tabulations to examine the relationship and the chi-square test to test for the presence of a systematic relationship.
*We have 2 variables, both with nominal scales, so we test for a nonmonotonic relationship. |
|
Chi- square (x squared) analysis |
Examination of frequencies for two nominal- scaled variables in a cross- tabulation table to determine whether the variables have a significant nonmonotonic relationship. |
|
What is the null hypothesis in a chi- square analysis? |
That the two variables are not related. |
|
2 ways to determine the nature of the relationship of a significant relationship (no support for null hypothesis) in a chi- square test |
1. Column- percentage table 2. Raw percentage table |
|
Main purpose of the chi- square test? |
To tell us if monotonic relationships are really present. |
|
In SPSS, where to find STATISTICS, CHI- SQUARE? |
CROSSTABS dialogue box. |
|
Chi- square analysis |
Assesses nonmonotonic associations in cross- tabulation tables and is based upon differences between observed and expected frequencies. |
|
Observed frequencies |
Counts for each cell found in the sample. |
|
Expected frequencies |
Calculated on the null out of "no association" between the two variables under examination. |
|
The chi- square distribution's shape changes depending on what? |
The number of degrees of freedom. |
|
The computed chi- square value is compared to a table value to determine what? |
Statistical significance. |
|
Formula for chi- square degrees of freedom and what each letter means |
(r - 1) (c - 1)
r= number of rows c= number of columns |
|
How to interpret the chi- square analysis? |
It yields the probability that the researcher would find evidence in support of the null hypothesis if he or she repeated the study many times with independent samples. |
|
What does it mean if the p value in a chi- square analysis is greater than or equal to .05? |
There is little support for the null hypothesis (no association).. Therefore we have a significant association.. we have the presence of a systematic relationship between the two variables. |
|
How to interpret a chi- square result? |
A significant chi- square result means the researcher should look at the cross tabulation row and column percentages to see the association pattern. |
|
What type of percentages can SPSS calculate? |
Row, column, or both. Located at the CELLS box at the bottom of the CROSSTABS dialog box. |
|
Do nonmonotonic relationships have direction? |
No, only presence and absence. |
|
2 instances in which you can use crosstabs and chi- square test: |
1. When you want to know if there is an association between two variables. 2. Both of those variables have nominal or ordinal scales. |
|
Correlation coefficient |
Index number, constrained to fall between the range of -1.0 and +1.0.
Communicates both the strength and direction of the linear relationship between two metric (interval or ratio) variables. |
|
The amount of linear relationship between two variables is communicated by what? |
The absolute size of the correlation coefficient. |
|
The direction of the association in a correlation coefficient is communicated by what? |
The sign of the correlation coefficient ( + or -). |
|
Covariation |
The amount of change in one variable systematically associated with a change in another variable. |
|
When measuring the association between interval or ratio scaled variables using SPSS, what commands are to be used? |
ANALYZE, CORRELATE, BIVARIATE. |
|
When looking at the presence of the p value, what does it mean if it is significant? |
If it is significant, there is a significant association, if it is not significant, there is no association. |
|
T/F: The closer the correlation is to 1 (+ or -), the stronger the association. |
True.
(1.0 and .81 are strong) (.80 and .61 are moderate) (.60 and .41 are weak) (.40 and .21 are very weak) |
|
A correlation coefficient's size indicates ____________________ between two variables. |
The strength of association. |
|
The sign + or - indicates _________________. |
The direction of association. |
|
T/F: For different types of variables, different strengths become important. |
True. |
|
3 special considerations in linear procedures |
1. Correlation takes into account only the relationship between two variables, not interaction with other variables. 2. Correlation does not demonstrate cause and effect. 3. Correlations will not detect non- linear relationships between variables. |
|
When there is no association, the p value for the Pearson r will be ____________. |
Less than .05. |
|
What do we use to measure the linear association between interval or ratio scaled variables (1-5 scaled response questions)? |
Pearson Product Moment Correlation. |
|
When there is association, the p value for the Pearson r will be ___________. |
Greater than or equal to .05. |
|
How often will researchers test the null hypothesis of no relationship or no correlation? |
Almost always. |
|
What happens when the null hypothesis is rejected? |
The researcher may have a managerially important relationship to share with the manager. |
|
Testing a non- null hypothesis |
You may test whether they are less than, greater than, or not equal. |
|
What must happen for your alpha error to be in one tail? |
Your hypothesis must be less than or greater than (this makes the hypothesis easier to prove). |
|
Statistical vs. causal linkage |
Causal-a certain variable affected the other.
Statistical- no certainty, some other variable may have had some influence (relationship). |
|
4 basic types of relationships between two variables |
1. Nonmonotonic 2. Monotonic 3. Linear 4. Curvilinear |
|
Cross- tabulation cell |
The intersection of a row and a column. |
|
Frequencies table |
Contains raw numbers determined from the preliminary tabulation.
|
|
3 sets of percentages that can be computed for cells in a table |
1. Raw percentages 2. Column percentages 3. Row percentages |
|
What does the computed chi- square value compare? |
Observed to expected frequencies. |
|
Chi- square distribution |
Skewed to the right and rejection region is always at the right hand tail of distribution. It's shape depends on the situation at hand and does not have negative values. |
|
Scatter diagram |
Plots the points corresponding to each matched pair of x and y variables. |
|
Correlation coefficient assumes that both variables share _________________ assumptions at minimum. |
Interval- scaling. If they had nominal scaling, cross- tabulation analysis would be used. |
|
T/F: The correlation coefficient takes into consideration only the relationship between two variables. |
True. |
|
Cause and effect relationship |
Condition of one variable bringing about the other variable. Correlation does not demonstrate this. |
|
Correlation coefficient in relation to the Pearson product |
Pearson expresses only linear relationships and is calculated from standardized data so the two variables must be identical. A correlation coefficient may not have a well defined pattern at all and will not detect nonlinear relationships. |