Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
72 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
services
|
intangible activities or benefits that an organization provides to satisfy consumers needs in exchange for money
|
|
generic approach to services
|
no difference between physical product and intangible service because you look for same effects of product. marketers dont believe it, economists do
|
|
business approach to services
|
act or performance provided by people, intangible, no lasting result. majority of marketers believe it
|
|
continuum approach to services
|
combo of physical product/service
|
|
characteristics of services
|
intangible, inseparability, perishability, variability
|
|
intangible characteristic of services
|
biggest characteristic, have to try to tangibilize the intangible, physical symbols of quality
|
|
inseparability characteristic of services
|
cant separate service rendered from service provider
technical: how good/bad was it functional: attitude of deliverer of service |
|
perishability characteristic of services
|
service cant be physically stored. give people incentive through lower price to control demand
|
|
variability characteristic of services
|
harder to achieve consistent quality of services
|
|
internal marketing
|
boss treats you well youre more likely to do well, dont assume people know how to offer good service
|
|
product life cycle
|
how do you manage and market product differently over time? majority of products dont go through all 4 stages. prices get lower as they move through stages. most products go straight to 3rd stage
|
|
plc: introduction
|
new to the world product is being introduced. people dont understand it so stimulate primary demand (inform/educate people about product) make no money usually. little to no competition. most new products fail
|
|
plc: growth
|
sales increasing at an increasing rate, some competition starts to enter, people understand product, stimulate selective demand (how brand is better) most profitable stage because little competition, demand > supply
|
|
plc: maturity
|
sales increasing at a decreasing rate, most expensive stage. "new and improved" supply>demand. lots of competition. no growth industry. brand grows if you steal sales from other brand. very aggressive marketing. can try to create new use for product
|
|
plc: decline
|
sales decreasing at an increasing rate. can still be profitable. if you have a loyal following and say its not gonna be offered anymore people will buy alot (sponge example)
|
|
how to extend plc
|
can keep product in maturity forever, take dying product and push it back into maturity
|
|
limitations of plc
|
better suited to explain characteristics of product, not brand
|
|
steps in new product development
|
half of new products fail, get rid of bad ideas before step 4
|
|
new product development: generate ideas
|
dont get rid of any ideas yet so people feel comfortable speaking up. brainstorm step
|
|
new product development: screen ideas
|
start getting rid of bad ideas, be objective as possible. prioritize success factors, give scores to ideas, see how they fit
|
|
new product development: product development
|
much more expensive than step 3. make product- make one/ just a few first (prototype) to see how it is. use test, package, brand name, target market, marketing strategy
|
|
new product development: test marketing
|
only step you can skip, majority fail
|
|
new product development: commercialization
|
most expensive stage, widescale manufacturing/ distribution advertising
|
|
branding strategy
|
can attach monetary value to element of brand
|
|
brand mark
|
symbol of brand, logos, slogan
|
|
value of branding
|
what is brand worth
|
|
brand equity equation
|
value of branding-brand awareness+brand loyalty+quality/value+brand associations+other brand assets
|
|
legal protection for branding elements
|
trademark, lanham act of 1946, trademark dilution act of 1995
|
|
speculative presentation
|
put together best work and present it for them to hire you
|
|
presentation reel
|
dvd of past radio/television work youve done, most proud of, shows range of what you can do, narrate on how successful it was
|
|
putting our account up for review
|
nice way of saying theyre firing you. theyll make a list of replacements and call them to compete then to #1 also sends formal request for proposal
|
|
request for proposal
|
barebones outline of what company is looking for in promotion
|
|
primary demand
|
desire for product class rather than specific brand since there are few competitors with the same product
|
|
selective demand
|
preference for specific brand
|
|
prestige pricing
|
setting a high price so status consumers will buy it
|
|
penetration pricing
|
opposite of skimming, set a low price. do it if demand is elastic and barrier entries are low. supply>demand
|
|
skimming
|
setting a high price for a product. use when production capacity is limited. demand>supply. demand is inelastic, barriers to entry are high
|
|
one price strategy
|
set one price for all buyers
|
|
variable pricing
|
flexible price
|
|
price lining
|
based on marketer, focuses on total profitability over a group of products over individual profitability (fashion)
|
|
2nd market discounting
|
offer discount to some target markets and not to others. if you can sell everything at full price then do that. excess capacity should be a requirement
|
|
leader pricing
|
inexpensive product you buy a lot, you know how much it costs so you know the deals when you see them
|
|
low leader
|
price is low, still make some profit
|
|
loss leader
|
lose money because price is so low
|
|
odd numbered pricing
|
ends in 9 or 5, typically lower priced items
|
|
bait and switch
|
type of leader pricing, lure people to store with a good deal on product then upsell them
|
|
captive pricing
|
complimentary products, give a deal on one then mark up the one that is bought more (razor and blades)
|
|
price bundling
|
sell a differentiated group of products at one price that would be cheaper than buying them all separately
|
|
multiple unit pricing
|
same group of products sold as a bundle
|
|
defenses against illegal price discrimination
|
cost-differential, leading the competition with good faith defense
|
|
meeting the competition
|
match price
|
|
personal selling
|
communication between buyer and seller
|
|
public relations
|
influence feelings opinions, beliefs held by consumers about product
|
|
publicity
|
nonpersonal, indirectly paid presentation of product
|
|
sales promotion
|
immediate, more bang for your buck. companies spend more on it than on advertising. coupons, sweepstakes, etc
|
|
sales promotional trap/spiral
|
offer goods for free, people expect it and get pissed when it stops
|
|
consumer
|
offered to customers
|
|
trade
|
offered to retailers
|
|
push strategy
|
promoting to retailers
|
|
pull strategy
|
promoting to consumers
|
|
integrated marketing communications
|
which combo of promotional elements to use, goal is to create consistent, memorable, creative campaign
|
|
channeling
|
group of businesses that enable distribution of products to buyers
|
|
direct channeling
|
producer to consumer
|
|
indirect channeling
|
products go through more people than just producer and consumer
|
|
electronic marketing
|
over computer
|
|
dual distribution
|
2+ target markets, use a different channel to reach each of them
|
|
vertical channels
|
companies at different levels of the channel are mad at each other
|
|
disintermediation
|
one channel member cuts another member out
|
|
horizontal channel
|
2 businesses on same level mad at each other
|
|
intensive distribution intensity
|
wherever type of product is sold you want to have a presence there (lower cost items)
|
|
exclusive distribution intensity
|
expensive product, not sold a lot of places
|
|
selective distribution intensity
|
selectively decide where to sell product
|