• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/276

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

276 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Attitude
A psychological tendency expressed by evaluating an entity with some degree of favor or disfavor
Affect
The emotional component of attitude
Cognitive dissonance
A state of tension that is produced when an individual experiences conflict between attitudes and behaviors
Social Learning
The process od deriving attitudes from family, peer groups, religious orgs, and culture
Job sanctification
A pleasurable or positive emotional state resulting from the appraisal of one's job or job experiences
Organizational Citizenship Behavior
Behavior that is above and beyond the call of duty
Organizational Commitment
The strength of an individual's identification with an org.
Affective Commitment
The type of org. commitment that is based on an individuals desire to remain in an org.
Continuance Commitment
The type of org commitment that is based on the fact that an individual cant afford to leave.
Normative Commitment
The type of org behavior that is based on an individuals perceived obligation to remain with an org,
Emotions
Mental states that typically include feelings, psych changes, and inclination to act.
Emotional Contagion
A dynamic process through which the emotions of one person are transferred to another, either consciously or unconsciously, through nonverbal channels
Ethical Behavior
Acting in ways consistent with ones personal values and the commonly held values of the org and society
Values
Enduring beliefs that a specific mode of conduct or end states of existence is personally or socially preferable to an opposite or converse ode of conduct or end stats of existence.
Instrumental Values
Values that represent the acceptable behaviors to be used in achieving some end state
Terminal values
Values that represent the goals to be achieved or ends states of existence
Machiavellianism
The personality characteristics indicating one's willingness to do whatever it takes to get one's way
Cognitive moral development
The process of moving through stages of maturity in terns of making ethical decisions.
Group
Two or more people with common interests, objectives, and continuing interaction
Work team
A group of ppl with complimentary skills who are committed to a common mission, performance goals, and approach for which they hold themselves mutually accountable.
Teamwork
Joint action by a team pf ppl in which individual interests are subordinated to team unity
Psychological intimiacy
Emotional and psychological closeness to other team or group members
Integrated involvement
Closeness achieved thought tasks and activities
Norms of behavior
the standards that a work-group uses to evaluate the behavior of its members
Group Cohession
the interpersonal glue that makes members of a group stick together
Social loafing
The failure of a group member to contribute personal time, effort, thoughts, or other resources to the group
Loss of individuality
A social process in which individual group members lose self-awareness and its accompanying sense of accountability, inhibition, and responsibility for individual behavior
Status structure
The set of authority and task relations among a groups members
Task function
An activity directly related to the effective completion of a team's work
Maintenance Function
An activity essential to effective, satisfying interpersonal relationships within a team or group
Self-managed teams
A team that makes decisions that were once reserved for managers
Upper echelon
Top-level exec team in an org.
Programed Decisions
A simple, routine matter for which a manager has an established decision rule
Non-programed decision
A new, complex decision that requires a creative solution
Effective decision
A timely decision that meets a desired objective and is acceptable to those individuals affected by it
Rationality
A logical, step-by-step approach to decision making, with a thorough analysis of alternatives and their consequences
Bounded Rationality
A theory that suggests that there are limits to how rational a decision makes can actually be.
Satifice
To select the first alternative that is "good enough" because the costs in time and effort are too great to optimize
Heuristics
Shortcuts in decision making that save mental activity
Escalation of commitment
The tendency to continue to support a failing course of action
Cognitive Style
An individual's preference for gathering information and evaluating alternatives
Risk Aversion
The tendency to choose options that entail fewer riskes and less certainty
Intuition
A fast, positive, force in decision making that is utilized at a level below consciousness and involves learned patterns of information
Creativity
A process influenced by an individual and org faces that results in the production of novel and useful ideas, or both
Synergy
A positive force that occurs in groups when group members stimulate new solutions to problems through process of mutual influence and encouragment within the group
Social decision schemes
Simple rules used to determine final group decisions
Groupthink
A deterioration of mental efficiency, reality, testing, and moral judgment resulting from pressures within the group
Group Polarization
The tendency for group discussion to produce shifts toward more extreme attitudes among members
Brainstorming
A technique for generating as many ideas as possible on a given subject while suspending evaluation until all the ideas have been suggested.
Nominal group technique (NGT)
A structured approach to group decision making that focuses on generating alternatives and choosing one
Devil's advocacy
A technique for preventing groupthink in which a group or individuals is given the role of a critic during decision making
Dialectical inquiry
A debate between two opposing sets of recommendations
Quality Circle
A small group of employees who work voluntarily on company time, typically one hour per week to address work-related problems such as quality control, cost reduction, production, planning, and techniques and at times product design.
Quality team
A team that is part of an orgs structure and is empowered to act on its decisions regarding product and service quality
Participative decision making
Decision making in which individuals who are affected by decisions influence the making of those decisions
Power
The ability to influence others
Influence
The process of affecting the thoughts, behavior, and feelings of another person
Authority
The right to influence another person
Zone of indifference
The range in which attempts to influence a person will be perceived as legitimate and will be acted on w/o a great deal of thought
Reward Power
Power based on an agents ability to control rewards that a target wants
Coercive Power
Power that is based on an agents ability to cause an unpleasant experience for a target
Legitimate Power
Power that is based on a position and mutual agreement; agent and target agree that the agent has right to influence target
Referent Power
An elusive power that is based on interpersonal attraction
Expert Power
The power that exists when an agent has a specialized knowledge or skills that the target needs
Strategic Contingencies
Activities that other groups depend on in order to complete their tasks
Information Power
Access to and control over important info
Personal Power
Power used for personal gain
Social Power
Power used to create motivation or to accomplish group goals
Powerlessness
Lack of power
Organizational politics
The use of power and influence in organization
Political behavior
Actions not officially sanctioned by an org that are taken to influence others in order to meet ones personal goals
Political Skill
The ability to get things done through favorable interpersonal relationships outside of formally prescribed organizational mechanisms
Empowerment
Sharing power within an organization
Leadership
The process of guiding and directing the behavior of people in the work environment
Formal leadership
Officially sanctioned leadership based on the authority of a formal position
Informal leadership
Unofficial leadership accorded to a person by other members of the organization
Leader
An advocate for changes and new approaches to problems
Manager
An advocate for stability and the status quo
Autocratic Style
A style of leadership in which the leader uses strong, directive, controlling actions to enforce the rules, regulations, activities, and relationships in the work environment
Democratic Style
A style of leadership in which the leader takes collaborative, responsive, interactive actions with followers concerning the work and work environment
Laissez-fire style
A style of leadership in which the leader fails to accept the responsibilities of the position
Initiating Structure
Leader behavior aimed at defining and organizing work relationships and roles as well as establishing clear patterns of organization, communication, and ways of getting things done
Consideration
Leader behavior aimed at nurturing friendly, warm working relationships, as well as encouraging mutual trust and interpersonal respect within the work unit
Leadership Grid
An approach to understanding a leaders or managers concern for results and concern for people
Organization man manager
(5,5) A middle of the road leader
Authority-compliance manager
(9,1) A leader who emphasizes efficient production
Country-club manager
(1,9) A leader who creates a happy, comfortable work environment
Team Manager
(9,9) A leader who builds a highly productive team of committed people
Autocratic Style
A style of leadership in which the leader uses strong, directive, controlling actions to enforce the rules, regulations, activities, and relationships in the work environment
Democratic Style
A style of leadership in which the leader takes collaborative, responsive, interactive actions with followers concerning the work and work environment
Laissez-fire style
A style of leadership in which the leader fails to accept the responsibilities of the position
Initiating Structure
Leader behavior aimed at defining and organizing work relationships and roles as well as establishing clear patterns of organization, communication, and ways of getting things done
Consideration
Leader behavior aimed at nurturing friendly, warm working relationships, as well as encouraging mutual trust and interpersonal respect within the work unit
Leadership Grid
An approach to understanding a leaders or managers concern for results and concern for people
Organization man manager
(5,5) A middle of the road leader
Authority-compliance manager
(9,1) A leader who emphasizes efficient production
Country-club manager
(1,9) A leader who creates a happy, comfortable work environment
Team Manager
(9,9) A leader who builds a highly productive team of committed people
Improvished Manager
A leader who exters just enough effort to get by
Paternalistic Manager
A leader who promises reward and threatens punishment
Opportunistic Manager
A leader whose style aims to maximize self-benefit
Least Preferred coworker
The person a leader has least preferred to work with over his or her career
Task Structure
The degree of clarity, ambiguity, in the work activities assigned to the group
Position Power
The authority associated with the leaders formal position in the organization
Leader-member relations
The quality of interpersonal relationships among a leader and the group members
Charismatic Leadership
A leader's use of personal abilities and talents in order to have profound and extraordinary effects on followers
Follower-ship
The process of being guided and directed by a leader in the work environment
Organizational design
The process of constructing and adjusting an organizations structure to achieve its goals
Organizational structure
The linking of departments and jobs within an org
Differentiation
The process of deciding how to divide the work in an organization
Intergration
The process of coordination the different parts of an organization
Formalization
The degree to which the organization has offical rules, regulations, and procedures
Centralization
The degree to which decisions are made at the top of the organization
Specialization
The degree to which jobs are narrowly defined and depend on a unique expertise
Standardization
The degree to which work activities are accomplished in a routine fashion
Complexity
The degree to which many different types of activities occur in the organization
Hierarchy of authority
The degree of vertical diffentiation across levels of mgmt
Simple structure
A centralized form of organization that emphasizes the upper echelon and direct supervision
Machine Bureaucracy
A moderatley decentralized form of organization that emphasizes the technical staff and standardization of work processes
Professional Bureaucracy
A decentralized form of organization that emphasizes the operating core and standardization of skills
Divisionalized Form
A moderately decentralized form of organization that emphasizes the MIDDLE level and standardization of outputs
Adhocracy
A selectively decentralized form of organization that emphasizes the support staff and mutual adjustments among people
Contextual Variables
A set of characteristics that influence the organizations design processes
Technological interdependence
The degree of interrelatedness of the organizations design processes
Environment
Anything outside the boundaries of an organization
Task Environment
The elements of an organizations environment that are related to its goal attainment
Environmental uncertainty
The amount and rate of change in an organization's environment
Mechanistic structure
An organizational design that emphasizes structured activities, specialized tasks, and centralized decision making
Organic Structure
An organizational design that emphasizes teamwork, open communication, and decentralized decision making
Organizational life cycle
The differing stages of an organizations life from birth to death
Organizational corporate culture
A pattern of basic assumptions that are considered valid and that are taught to new members as the way to perceive, think, and feel in the org
Artifacts
symbols of culture in the physical and social work environments
Espoused values
What members of an organization say they value
Enacted Values
Values reflected in the way individuals actually behave
Assumptions
Deeply held beliefs that guide behavior and tell members of an org how to perceive and think about things
Strong culture
An org culture with a consensus on the values that drive the company and with an intensity that is recognizable even to outsiders
Adaptive culture
An org culture that encourages confidence and risk taking among employees, has leadership that produces change, and focuses on the changing needs of customers
Organizational socialization
The process by which newcomers are transformed from outsiders to participating, effective members of the organization
Anticipatory Socialization
The first socialization stage, which encompasses all of the learning that takes place PRIOR to the newcomer's first day on the job
Encounter
The SECOND socialization stage in which the newcomer learns the tasks associated with the job, clarifies roles, and establishes new relationships at work.
Change and acquisition
The THIRD socialization stage in which the newcomer begins to master the demands of the job
Triangulation
The use of multiple methods to measure organizational culture
Planned Change
Change resulting from a deliberate decision to alter the organization
Unplanned change
Change that is imposed on the organization and is often unforeseen
Incremental change
Change of a relatively small scope, such as making small improvements
Strategic Change
Change of a larger scale, such as organizational reconstructing
Transformational change
Change in which the organization moves to a radically different, and sometimes unknown future state
Change agent
The individual or group that undertakes the task of introducing and managing a change in an organization
Unfreezing
The first step in Lewin's change model, in which individuals are encouraged to discard old behaviors by shaking up the equilibrium state that maintains the status quo
Moving
The second step in Lewins change model, in which new attitudes, values, and behaviors are substituted for old ones
Refreezing
The final step in Lewin's change model, in which new attitudes, values, and behaviors are established as the new statue qup
Organization development (OD)
A systematic appraoch to organizational improvement that applies behavioral science theory and research in order to increase individual and organizational well-being and effectiveness
Survey Feedback
A widely used method of intervention whereby employee attitudes are solicited using a questionnaire
Management by objectives (MBO)
An organization-wide intervention technique that involves joint goal setting between employees and managers
Quality program
A program that embeds product and service quality excellence in the organizational culture
Team building
An intervention designed to improve the effectiveness of a work group
Process Consultation
An OD method that helps managers and employees improve the effectiveness of a work group
Skills training
Increasing the job knowledge, skills, and abilities that are necassary to do a job efficently
Leadership Training and development
A variety of techniques that are designed to enhance individuals leadership skills
Executive coaching
A technique in which managers or execs are paired with a coach in a partnership to help the exec perform more efficently
Role Negotiation
A technique whereby individuals meet and clarify their psychological contract
Job redesign
An OD intervention method that alters jobs to improve the fit between individual skills and the demands of the job
How does persuasion work?
Through persuasion, one individual (the source) tries to change the atitude of another person (the target)
Three expertise that affect persuasion
Expertise- particularly persuasive
Trustworthiness
Attractiveness
Persuading people
Low self-esteem are easiest to persuade as well as the ones in a good mood
People with very extreme attitudes are more resistant
When persuading, use both sides of an argument and when presented in a non-persuasive matter
True
Central Route used in persuasion
Involves direct cognitive processing of the messages content
high elaboration --> careful processing --> attitude change depending on the quality of arguments
Peripheral Route
Not motivated to pay attention to content, but issues that are characteristics of the persuader. Low elaboration --> absence of careful processing -->attitude change depending on source of characteristics or non substantial aspects of message
Positive emotions at work
These occur when work is positive and goals are being met and inspired to perform better
Negative emotions at work
Events that threaten the achievement of goals cause negative emotions endanger emotions and job satisfaction at work
Emotions
Spread easily
Most of the contagion occurs non-verbally and mimicry
All work teams are groups, but not all groups are work teams
True
Groups
They emphasize individual leadership, individual accountability, and individual work products
Two types of integrated intimacy
Psychological- emotional and psych closeness. Results in feelings of affection and warmth. Failure to achieve this results in isolation and loneliness.
Integrated- Through tasks and activities. Failure for these result in social isolation.
Psych=more emotion based
Integrated=behavior and activity based. Contributes to social psych and well being
Norms
The standards that are written, nonwritten, etc and as long as people know and understand there, it can be effective to the group members
Group cohesion
Enhances job satisfaction and it increases job complexity and task autonomty leads to increased group cohesion which=better performance
Ways to avoid social loafing
Identifying individual contributions to the group product and member self-evaluations
loss of individuality is more violent and harmful than social loafing
True
Bennis and Shepard's four stages of group formation
Mutual acceptance, decision making, motivation and commitment, and control and sanctions

Interpersonal issues= trust, personal comfort, and security

Authority- decisions of who is in charge and who has the right to do what
Diversity is NOT important when forming a group and can actually decrease groups performance
FALSE!
Bruce Tuckman's group development model
Forming=team members are unclear about individual roles and responsibility. All of them need to feel like they are part of the team before next stage

Storming=A lot of problems arise as well as conflict. Power struggles and coaching and where trust comes into play

Norming stage=agreement and consensus. Clear roles and responsibilities, Facilitation.

Performing= clear vision and purpose and start to focus on goal achievement and delegation starts
Need a leader tho!

Adjourning= Task completion and good feeling achievements as well as recognition.
Teams work linearly from one step to another in predetermined sequence
FALSE
Groups alternate between periods of inertia and little progress towards goal achievement punctuated my bursts of energy as work groups develop and majority of group work accomplished
True
Teams tend to tend to share leadership while groups have one leader
False
Task functions vs maintenance functions
Task= info seeking, ideas, suggestions, defining problems and solutions, and facts

Maintenance functions=enhance togetherness, cooperation, teamwork, and psychological intimacy
Greater variance in age within a team leads to more member-to-member connections and fewer disconnections
TRUE!
The teams with moderate structural diversity achieve the WORST performance
FALSE!
Team creativity
This can be enhanced through greater diversity, electronic brainstorming, training facilitators, memberships change in teams, and building palyground
Empowerment skills
Competence=See if you can handle mroe tasks and than give them more responsibility

Process skills=negotiating skill and strategy

Development of cooperative and helping behaviors

Communication skills=self expression and reflective listening
People that need the most help in groups, often receive the least help b/c people focused on the "expert" person
True
"Wild turkey"
A devils advocate who keeps top mgmt on track by challenging conventional thinking
Multicultural top teams
The advantages of culturally diverse groups include the generation of more and better ideas while limiting the risk of group think
Group decision making bring more knowledge and experience to problem-solving situations
True
Group decisions
Social decision schemes includes:

Majority win: whatever majority wants

Truth-wins=predicts the correct decision will emerge as an increaasing number of members realize its appropriateness

2/3=2/3 of ppl like it

First shift rule=members support a decision by the first shift opinion member
Advantages of group decisions
1. more knowledge and info through pooling of group member rescources
2. Increased acceptance of the commitment to the decision b.c all have voice in it
3. Greater understanding of the decision
Disadvantages of group decisions
1. Pressure within a group to conform and fit in
2. domination of the group make by a forceful member o
3. The amount of time required because group decisions take longer than individual
Things that cause groupthink
Highranking groups, high cohesive groups, homogenous groups, highly consequential decision making, and time constraints
Consequences of groupthink
Incomplete survey of argumentativeness, failure to evaluate the risks of preferred course of action, biased information processing, and failure to work out contingency plans.

Overall problem=defective decision making
Teams that experience emotion-based conflict are better at making decisions that task-based
FALSE!
Group discussion
Produces shifts from more risky positions and towards more cautious
Why does group polarization happen?
Social comparison approach
Afer discussion, views arent far from average, so shift to extreme positions

Persuasive arguments= Group discussion reinforces the initial views of the members so take extreme position

So, because of this, they take extremes and can be a problem!
Ways to avoid group decision making
Brainstorming
NGT- good for fear of criticism and all done discrete
Devils advocacy- Helps sustain the vitality and performance of upper management and challenges decisions
Dialectical inquiry=Debate between recommendations and it is framed so its not in a negative connotation
Team orientation is good because it leads to broader tasks and a greater sense of responsibility
True
Three prereqs for participation and empowerment
1. Capability to become psychologically involved in participative activities
2. The motivation to act autonomously
3. The capacity to see the revelance of participation for ones own being
Participative decision making
ID problems, generating alternatives, selecting solutions, planning implementations, or evaluating results

all of these lead to higher job satisfaction. If not in all stages, at least come with involvement in generating alternatives, planning implementations, and evaluating results
Enlarging the zone of indifference is done by...
This is accomplished by power, not authority
Reward power are only good if it can lead to better performance and as long as the employee sees the clear distinction
True
People often feel welcome, satisfied, and valued when a manager uses coercive power
FALSE! They feel threatened, abused, or non-supported
Legitmate power people must know and understand that a person has the right to influence the decisions in their life
True
People that use referent power are often non-individualistic and are not respected by target
FALSE! Exact opposite
Three conditions must be met for expert power to work
1. The target must trust the expertise given is accurate
2. The knowledge involved must be relevant and useful to the target
3. Targets perception id the agent is CRUCIAL
Rewards and coercive similarities
Manager must be present at all times and both lead to compliance and temporary.
Legitimate power leads to compliance
Org goals are usually not met bc told what to do all the time
Referent is the LEAST threatening
FALSE! Most dangerous power because since it can alter behaviors
Expert power is the power of the future
True! If you think your manager is an expert, listen to them more b.c want to mimic attributes
Group control over strategic contingencies
1. Ability to cope with uncertainty- if a group can help another group deal with uncertainty=power! EX:legal dpt

2. High degree of centrality within the org- dependance on each other

3. Nonsubstitutability- the extent to which a group performs a function that is indispensable to an organization

All of these depend on dependancy of one another.
Using power ethically. 3 main ?'s
1. Does the behavior produce a good outcome for people both inside and outside the organization?
2. Does the behavior respect the rights of all parties?
3. Does the behavior treat all parties equitably and fairly? Distributive justice...
Four Social Power orientated characteristics
1. Belief in the authority system- ok with being influenced and influencing others
2. Preference for work and discipline- like to work and very orderly
3. Altruism- company before you
4. Belief in justice- People should receive that to which they are entitled and that which they earn
Kanter's Symbols of power
1. Ability to intercede for someone in trouble- pull someone out of a jam
2. Ability to get placements for favored employees- getting a key promotion for an employee=power
3. Exceeding budget limitations- above budget and no problem
4. Procuring above-average raises for employees
5. Getting items on the agenda at meetings
6. Access to early info
7. Having top managers seek out their opinion

You are doing things for tohers and active symbol of power. Helping others
Furniture (Korda's symbols of power)
If you lock things, something important. The bigger the desk, the better
Time Power (Korda's symbols of power)
Remove watch. "My time is you time" The more power, no watch.
Standing by (Korda's symbols of power)
People are obligated to keep cells with them at all times. AKA, the more power you can impose on others, the more you have
Korda's symbols of power
All about a person's standing and status and from that understanding the power use in the org.
Four tactics mostly used in orgs
1. Consultation- a person seeks you for advice on how to make things change
2. Rational persuasion- logical arguments and facts to persuade you
3. Inspirational appeals- The person makes an emotional request that arouses your emotions
4. Integrations- Person seeks you in a good mood or b/c they think your the best for job
Women need to become better with work politics to move up faster
True
Political skill buffers the negative effects of stressors such as role conflict in a work setting.
True
manage Political behavior
Encourage social power not personal power

Clarify expectations regarding performance-clear attainable goals

Participative mgmt- by including the people who feel not, more positive input and eliminate behind the scenes maneuvering

Encouraging cooperation

Supportive and clear environment
Managing relationships with your boss
1. Make sure your boss and their context- goals, obj, strengths, etc
2. Asses yourself and your needs- your strengths, personal style, and authority figures
3. Develop and maintain relationship- both your expectations and dependability as well as honesty
Four steps to empowerment
Meaning- a fit between the work role and the employee's values and beliefs
Competence- belief that one has the ability to do the job well.
Self-determination- having control over the way one does his or her work.
Impact- one's job makes a difference within the organization

Need to experience all 4 to feel empowered
How managers can help employees feel empowered
Express confidence in them
Create opportunities for them to make decisions
Remove bureaucratic constraints that stifle autonomy
Set inspirational goals
Job content
Consists of tasks and procedures neccassary for doing a job
Job context
Reason the org needs the job and includes he way the job fits org's mission, goals, and objectives
Empowerment grid- Point A
No discretion- traditional assembly line job (lower left corner)
Empowerment grid- Point B
Task setting- Right corner=most empowerment programs and worker is empowered and best but no responsibility for job context
Empowerment grid-Point C
Participatory Empowerment- Middle=represents a situation that is autonomous. Participatory empowerment leads to job satisfaction and productivity
Empowerment grid= Point D
Mission defining (top left)= Unusual case and seldom. Have power but no content.
Empowerment grid- Point E
Self-management (Right corner)= represents total decision making control over both content and context
Empowerment should start with job content ---> job context
True
Leaders agiatate for change and new approaches while managers advocate stability and the status quo
True
Leaders
1. Have impersonal, passive, functional attitudes and believe goals arise out of needs and reality
2. Views work as a process that combines people, thoughts, and ideas Risk through coordination and balance
3. They prefer relationship with others and work close together to avoid conflict
4. Sense of self- accepts life as it is
Managers
1. Personal and active attitude and believe that goals arise from desire and imagination
2. Look for fresh approaches to old problems and high-risk positions and high payoffs
3. Comfortable with solitary work and not conflict averse
4. Sense of self- twice born,questions life
According to Vroom-Yetton-Jago Normative Decision Model
1. Decide- Manager must make the decisions alone and announce it or sell it to the group
2- Consult individuality- the managers presents the problem to the group INDIVIDUALY and then makes the decision
3. Consult group- Manager proposed problem to group members and than maes a decision
4. Facilitate- Acts as a facilitator and not to manage, but to get concurrence
5. Delegate- Group makes decisions w/in limits and encouragement
The utility is limited to the leader decision making tasks. The proper method has to work through the matrices
True!
Situational Leadership Model
Made my Hersey and Blanchard, it suggests that the leader's behavior should be adjusted to the maturity level of the followers. Task vs. relationship oriented
Leader must be able to determine readability of each follower for each task
true
Telling Style (S1)
High task and low relationship
Selling (S2)
A situational leadership style that is VERY high task and high relationship based
Participating (S3)
A situational leadership style that is high relationship oriented and low tasked.
Delegating (S4)
A situational leadership style that is low relationship and low task
One key limitation of the situational leadership style model is the absence of...
a central hypotheses that could be tested. Used for training and development of corporations. Focuses on followers maturity
Leader-Member exchange
Leaders form two groups of followers- the in-groups and out-groups
In-group follower members
Similar to leader and more attention. Work with "circle of trust"
Out-group follower members
Outside circle and dont receive that much attention. Managed by formal rules
Transformational leader
These sorts of leaders inspire and excite followers to high levels of performance. Focus on personal attributes, not official positions
In order to be a transformational leader, you need to have four sub-dimensions
Charisma, individualized consideration (above call of duty AKA Starbucks), inspirational motivation, and intellectual stimulation.
Charismatic leadership
Steve Jobs. Convince even skeptics that his plans were worth to support, no matter how unrealistic they are can convince them. Hitler vs. Clinton
According to Vroom-Yetton-Jago Normative Decision Model
1. Decide- Manager must make the decisions alone and announce it or sell it to the group
2- Consult individuality- the managers presents the problem to the group INDIVIDUALY and then makes the decision
3. Consult group- Manager proposed problem to group members and than maes a decision
4. Facilitate- Acts as a facilitator and not to manage, but to get concurrence
5. Delegate- Group makes decisions w/in limits and encouragement
The utility is limited to the leader decision making tasks. The proper method has to work through the matrices
True!
Situational Leadership Model
Made my Hersey and Blanchard, it suggests that the leader's behavior should be adjusted to the maturity level of the followers. Task vs. relationship oriented
Leader must be able to determine readability of each follower for each task
true
Telling Style (S1)
High task and low relationship
Emotional intelligence
Recognize and manage emotions for oneself and others. Lets you be cool under high stress situations. Cool things down, but crank it up when you have to.
Trust
Higher trust means if team members trust each other, they have a better chance of "getting in" and more readily. Make sure who you know to trust!
Gender and leadership.
No such distinction. Depends on leadership style, not gender. Women more people oriented so they can make more decisions.
Servant leadership
Serve the people and others.
S2 leaders
High task and relationship (selling)
S3 leaders
High relationship and low task (participating)
S4 leader
Low relationship and low task (delegating)
Leader-Member exchange
In-group vs. out-group. "In" cirlce or not. More satisfied if "in" and not intimidated by managers
Transformational leaders
Like Starbucks, not scared to break the mold and inspire and excite followers.
Charismatic leadership
Steve Jobs. Have a persuasive ability and peculiar charisma. Passionately committed to insane projects, w/o regarding practicality of it. Hitler vs. Clinton example
Authentic leadership
"Ethical" leadership. Do what is right and moral. Surround by positive thoughts and emotions
Follower-ship
Emphasizes the followers individual responsibility and self control.
Effective followers
Active, responsible, and use critical thinking. Best for company because they practice self-mgmt and self responsibility. 2nd=committed to org and prides with themselves. 3=Put a lot in company. 4. Courageous, honest, and credible
Environment affect performance in the work place
True!
5 guidelines to BEST leadership and most recent
1. Leaders and orgs should appreciate unique attribures
2. No single best way to lead
3. Participative, active, and concern for others
4. Different leadership situations call for different styles and behaviors
5. Good leaders usually great followers