Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
21 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
What was the aim in mann et Als study |
To test police officers ability to distinguish truths and lies during police interviews with suspects |
|
|
Who were the participants in mann et Al |
99 Kent Police officers, 24 females and 75 males with the mean age of 34.3. 78 were detectives, 8 were trainers, 4 were traffic officers and the remaining 9 were uniformed reasoner officers |
|
|
What was the procedure for mann et Al |
Saw video clips of 14 suspects showing their head and torso. They were asked to identify whether the person was telling a truth or lie and how confident they were and asked to list the cues they had used |
|
|
How long did the clips vary in may et Al study? |
6-145 seconds - 54 clips in total |
|
|
What was the difference between the mean lie accuracy and truth accuracy in mann et Al study |
Lie accuracy: 66.2% Truth accuracy 63.6% |
|
|
What was the most frequently mentioned cue to lying was in mann et Al |
Gaze, second was movement, vagueness, contradiction in their stories and fidgeting were also mentioned |
|
|
What was step one in inbau study |
Direct confrontation |
|
|
What is step two in inbau study |
Chance of shift in blame |
|
|
What is step three in inbau study |
Never allowed to deny guilt |
|
|
What was step four in inbau study |
Ignoring any attempt of confession |
|
|
What was step five of inbau |
Reinforce sincerity, keeping good eye contact and using first names |
|
|
What was step six in inbau |
Move towards offering alternative - if the suspect cries, infer guilt |
|
|
What was step seven in inbau study |
Pose the 'alternative question' giving two choices what could be done, one being more social acceptable |
|
|
What was Step eight in inbau Study |
Get the suspect at admit guilt in front of witness |
|
|
What was step nine in inbau |
Document their admission and get them to sign a confession to avoid them retracting it later |
|
|
What was the aim in Gudjusson false confessions? |
To document a case of false confessions |
|
|
Who was the participant in Gudjusson false confessions |
17 year old who was convicted of killing and Sexual assault of 2 elderly women |
|
|
Who long was the interview in Gudjusson false confessions |
14 hours |
|
|
How many interviews were involved in Gudjusson false confessions |
3 |
|
|
What was the score given in Gudjusson suggestibility test |
10 |
|
|
What was the participants iq |
94 |
