Reading...
Play button
Play button
Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
28 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
scholars refer to Luke and Acts as “Luke–Acts” because of a book by
|
Henry Joel Cadbury
|
|
|
see Luke and Acts as a kind of Greco-Roman biography and/or historical monograph
|
GENRE: Charles Talbert and David Aune
|
|
|
SPEECHES: 30% of Acts. Missionary speeches have same basic pattern.
|
Martin Dibelius vs. F.F. Bruce.
|
|
|
AUTHORSHIP: “we passages”
|
Martin Dibelius vs. Vernon K. Robbins vs. Jacques Dupont
|
|
|
GOD: controls history
|
Robert O’Toole
|
|
|
God keeps his promises
|
Darrell Bock
|
|
|
JESUS: somewhat more exalted in Acts than in the Gospel of Luke but naturally. Discussion of “absentee christology” and how Jesus saves.
|
C. D. F. Moule and Bock
|
|
|
HOLY SPIRIT: A person —inward, permanent, corporate, and universal (not outward, temporary, individual, and national).
|
Roger Stronstad
|
|
|
The Holy Spirit has gives the power for witness
|
Leo O’Reilly
|
|
|
Repentance, baptism, and reception of the Spirit go together
|
F.F. Bruce
|
|
|
FOUR THEOLOGY METHODS FOR ACTS:1) edits, 2) speeches, 3) “key texts,” and 4) themes. Luke IS a theologian.
|
Beverly Gaventa
|
|
|
Luke adressed the delayed parousia
|
Conzelamnn
|
|
|
the parousia could happen at any moment
|
Mattil
|
|
|
the ascension= the parousia in the present
|
Flender
|
|
|
Definite future parousia
|
Talbert and Gaventa
|
|
|
a mixed/two-stage end-times; “already–not yet.”
|
E. Earle Ellis
|
|
|
apostolic succession and “early catholicism.”
|
Käsemann
|
|
|
apostles are (only) important founders
|
Conzelmann
|
|
|
suspect Luke is a patriarchal sexist
|
Fiorenza & Tetlow
|
|
|
mission to Gentiles replaces to Israel
|
Ernst Haenchen
|
|
|
Mission to Gentiles supplements to Israel
|
Robert Brawley
|
|
|
to Gentiles completes to Israel.
|
Jacob Jervell
|
|
|
Luke never intended to write history
|
Richard Pervo
|
|
|
Luke writes just like other ancient historians
|
E. Plümacher
|
|
|
compares Acts to the rules of writing history given by ancient historians Dionysius and Lucian and finds Luke measures up and intended to tell truth.
|
W. C. van Unnik:
|
|
|
Luke’s preaches on top of the historical facts.
|
C. K. Barrett
|
|
|
skeptically separates tradition from redaction.
|
G. Lüdemann
|
|
|
evidence shows Acts to be accurate history
|
Colin Hemer:
|
