• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/37

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

37 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

How does the economy solve problems?

Classical or Keynesian approach

Classical

focuses on supply of the market

recessionary gap (classical)

economy is too small -> wages drop -> bus. profit increases -> bus expansion -> shift of supply curve to right, eliminates gap

inflationary gap (classical)

economy is too big -> wages rise -> bus profit decline -> bus reduce activities -> shift of supply curve to left, eliminates gap

five basic principles of classical

focuses attention on supply (production provides answers to problems) | market is central focus | govt has minor, minimal role (should not be involved) | marketplace should be flexible (price/wages should change) | marketplace is always balance (supply = demand, if not balanced, will do so on its own)

Seys law

supply creates its own demand

Keynesian approach

made by John Meynard Keynes, focuses on demand

Keynesian vs classical

Market is rigid (classical = flexible) | market won't solve its own problems (classical it does) | govt fixes problems (classical = no govt involvement) | demand comes from consumers and businesses)

determinants of consumer spending

key influence -> income
Past income -> current spending habits


income from last pay


confident from earning it


income you will earn

marginal perpencity to consume

how much you will spend & save from last paycheck


= change in comsumption / change in income

non income determinants

wealth, how much you borrow, future expectations, real current interest ratios

wealth effect

higher wealth, higher spending

average perpencity to consume

how much you would save/spend from all paychecks


= consumption / income

business spending

main goal -> profit
no profit -> no projects
earned profits -> money spent on projects

calculating benefit of a project

expected rate of return (company earnings) / amount of investment
compared to cost of project

cost of project

determined by real interest rates

what effects decision of a project

rate > cost -> project is done


cost > rate -> money is not spent


higher interest rate -> less is spent

what can change how you calculate rate of return

cost of acquisition, business taxes, tech changes in production, amount of capital goods available, planned inventory changes, expectations

reasons for unstable business spending

unstable = varies year to year


variability of company expectations | durability of equipment | irregulatory of development of new products | variability of profit (key source of investment money)

expenditure multiplier

magnified effect on GDP when money is spent


when $$ is earned, it is spent over and over again


= 1 / (1 - MPC) OR 1 / MPS

change in GDP

amount of spending * multiplier

expansion and decline of GDP

investment > savings = decline in inventory -> GDP expands
savings > investment = inventory growth -> GDP declines

equilibrium GDP

savings = investment


aggregate expenditures intersects 45 degree line

fiscal policy

too little demand = govt must pick up slack

two reactions to recessionary gap

increase govt spending
reduce taxes


both are discretionary fiscal policy

two reactions to GDP gap

(diff between potential and actual GDP)


GDP gap / expenditure multiplier = how much should be spent
GDP gap / tax multiplier = how much taxes should be cut

tax multiplier

MPC / 1 - MPC

automatic stabilizers OR nondiscretionary fiscal policies

govt expenditures that happen automatically
congress doesn't decide
unemployment benefits, changes in progress tax rates

criticism of got involvement

long time lag, decisions are political and not economic, state govt does the opposite of federal

crowding out effect

govt borrows money = higher interest rate (bus invest less)
defeats primary purpose of increased spending

budget deficit

govt spends more than it collects in a year

national debt

total money govt borrows over the past year that isn't paid back

3 reasons govt collects

recessions, military activities, undisciplined physical actions (govt cuts taxes, not spending)

ways to see national debt

actual # (18 trillion) | debt compared to GDP (ratio)

issues with national debt

bankruptcy (govt can go bankrupt but not likely)
must it be paid back? yes, but govt can refinance
does it put a burden on future generations? yes & no, depends what it is spent on

real effect of debt on ecnomy

more unequal income distribution, higher taxes (disincentives work/investment), loss of resources to other countries, crowding out effect

fixing GDP gap

GDP gap / expenditure multiplier