• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/23

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

23 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Logically consistent
it is possible for all the members of the set to be true
logically inconsistent
it is not possible for all members of the set to be true
standard form
list of stated premises followed by the conclusion
deductive validity
an argument is deductively valid if and only if it is not possible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false
deductive soundness
an argument is sound if it is valid and the premises are all true
logically true
it is not possible for the sentence to be false
logically indeterminate
a sentence is logically indeterminate if and only if it is neither logically true nor logically false
logically equivalent
the members of a pair of sentences are logically equivalent if and only if it is not possible for one of the sentences to be true while the other is false
entailment
a set entails a sentence P of SL if and only if there is no tva under which each member of set is true but P is false
TF truth
true on every TVA
TF false
false on every TVA
TF indeterminacy
not TF true nor false
TF equivalence
sentences P and Q are TF equivalent iff there is no TVA on which P and Q have different truth values
a set is TF consistent if...
there is at least one TVA in which all members of the set are true
using a truth tree, a set is tf consistent if
there is at least one open branch
using a truth tree, a set is tf inconsistent if
it has a closed truth tree
P is tf false using a tree iff
set {P} has a closed truth tree
P is tf true using a tree iff
set {~P} has a closed true
P is tf indeterminate using a tree iff
neither {P} nor {~P} has a closed truth tree
If the truth tree for {P} is open, how does one find out if it is tf true or indeterminate
if there are 2^n recovered tvas, it is tf true. otherwise, it is tf indeterminate
P and Q are t.f. equivalent iff
{~(P≡Q)} has a closed tree
a set of sentences tf entails P iff
setU{~P} has a closed tree
An argument is TF valid if (using a tree)
the set consisting of the premises and the negation of the conclusion has a closed truth tree