• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/17

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

17 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Argument construction
1) point is expressed
2) reasons are given

group of statements, one is said to follow from the others

construction:
-premises
|inference - relationship between them
-conclusion
-indicator words for conclusion and premises
Argument form
1. premise (1)
2. premise (2)
~~~~~~~~~~~~
3. conclusion

1)All humans are mortal
2) Socrates is human
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
3)Socrates is human
Enthymemes
an argument that is missing premises or conclusion
Principle of Charity
interpreting a speaker's statement to be rational and considering it's best, strongest possible interpretation
Requirements of good reasoning
1) Accurate information
2) Strong connection between premises and conclusion

good argument: one in which
-a) given the premises, the conclusion follows from them with either deductive validity or inductive strength, and
b) the premises are true
-DU and IS are two different standards of inferential strength
-(a) and (b) are logically independent from one another
deductive validity
An argument is deductively valid if and only if, given true premises, the conclusion necessarily follows

deduction
/ \
/ \
valid invalid

inductive strength
given the premises are true, the conclusion follows PROBABLY; it is more likely to be true then not

induction
/ \
/ \
strength weakness
True premises requirements
the premises must be true for the argument to be valid.
Deductive/Inductive diagram
Logical form: Syllogism
3 line argument consisting of :
(a) major premise
(b) minor premise
(c) conclusion

1) All A are B
2) All B are C
~~~~~~~~~~~
3) therefore, all A are C
Logical Form: Barbara
1) All A are B
2) All B are C
~~~~~~~~~~~
3) All A are C
Logical Form: Disjunctive Syllogism
argument using premises where there is an "either" option or "or"

1) A or B
2) Not A/ Not B
~~~~~~~~~~~~
3) B/A
Logical Form: Modus Ponens
conditional statement; "if...then" statement

1) If A then B
2) A
~~~~~~~~~~~
3) B
Logical Form: Modus Tollens
anticedent consequence
^ ^
1) If A then B
2) Not B
~~~~~~~~~~~
3) Not A
Fallacy of Denying the Anticedent
1) If A then B. true
2) Not A. true
~~~~~~~~~~
3) Not B.
true.
VALID
Fallacy of Affirming the Consequent
1) If A then B
2) B
~~~~~~~~~~~
3) A
Fallacy of Undistributed Middle
Don't know they are related
1) All A are B ------------/
2) All C are B----------/
~~~~~~~~~~~
3) All A are C