• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/60

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

60 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Linguistic Context

what has been said in the conversation prior to the utterance being interpreted


-pronouns (he, it_ and responses like 'yes' and 'no' depend on prior context

Situational Context

the context provided by the general situation

-important in face-to-face communication


-what is that? the mayor. rachel is tall (situational context)


Social Context

knowledge of the social roles and relationships between the participants in a conversation


-includes knowing what is appropriate to say in certain situations


-knowledge of both of these things helps provide context to utterances


--wouldn't say 'ya whatever' to the judge who is sentencing you

Conversational Maxims

Quality, Quantity, Manner, Relevance

Maxim of Quality

do not say what you believe to be false


do not say that for which you lack evidence


-conversations will not be successful if ppl spread falsehoods


-good evidence may vary by situational or social context

Maxim of Relevance

Be relevant


-listeners STRONGLY assume speakers are adhering to this maxim


-allows us to make inferences

Maxim of Quantity

-make your contribution as informative as required


-do not make your contribution more informative than is required


-amnt of detail required depends on situation

Maxim of Manner

-avoid obscurity, avoid ambiguity, be brief, be orderly


--how info is presented, not what info is presented


-listeners expect events to be retold in chronological order

Implication

Implying is sending a message without saying directly


-looking at watch implies lets hurry up

Inference

inference is a reasonable conclusion based on the set of circumstances


-one must infer the message of the implication


-one can infer without anyone implying anything


--wet roads might lead you to infer that it raining



Implicature

information suggested by, but not expressly contained in or entailed by, an utterance


-drawn by considering a wide range of info regarding the context, society and other useful things

Kinship Terms

method for linguistic anthropologists to determine cultural ideals in a given language


-in English, kinship terms are organized by


--gender (mother/father, sister/brother_


--generation( mother, grandmother)


--lineage (mother-son, aunt, nephew_


--blood vs marriage relations

Curse Words

reflect a society's values

Communicative Competence

ability to interact and communicate according to cultural norms

-politeness, speaker roles, turn-taking rules, greetings

Politeness

expected of normative linguistic strategies culturally agreed-upon to be appropriate in a given situation

--direct vs indirect


--close the door vs. would you mind closing the door


T/V: t when you are talking to someone you are confortable with


v when showing respect, formality, or there is a power differential


-honorifics

Face Theory

theory of politeness based on positive and negative face

Face Threatening Acts (FTAs)

speech acts that may threaten one's face

Positive Face

desire to be liked and valued by others

Negative Face

desire to be free from imposition and restraint

Positive Politeness

strategy to accommodate one's desire to be liked by others


--i know you packed an extra pen for your best friend

Negative Politeness

strategy to accommodate one's desire to not be bothered or have one's independence impeded upon


--you wouldn't happen to have a spare pen, would you?

Bald on record FTAs

no politeness or mitigation strategy is used


-give me a pen

Off-record FTA

indirect speech acts that avoid making explicit impositions on hearer


--I can't believe I forgot to bring my pen!

Dialects

when a group of people exhibit systematic differences from another group of people, they are said to be speaking different dialects


-distinction between language and a dialect is historical and political


--most languages will have a standard dialect


---reflects the preferences of groups in positions of power in the society

Languages

-system of communication characterized by a set of rules, and spoken by a group of speakers


-languages may have different varieties spoken by different groups of people

Mutual Intelligibility

if speakers of different dialects can understand each other, they are mutually intelligible


-if dialects are mutually intelligible, they are usually considered to be part of the same language

Accent

the phonological patterning of a dialect


-every dialect has an accent, although we only hear the accents of other dialects


--due to habituatioin

Prestige

attitudes towards different dialects simply reflect the different social status (prestige) of different groups of speakers


--if you think speakers of a dialect sound smart/rude/lazy its bc you think the group associated with it has that quality

Isogloss

boundary on a dialect map

--distinguish language varieties according to some characteristic


--when isoglosses coincide, you are probably dealing with different dialects


Social Influences on Variation

social factors affect speech through a subconscious desire to express solidarity with a certain group


-alternatively, speakers may speak differently as a rejection of the values of characteristics of antoher group

Socioeconomic Variation

rich and poor ppl have fairly different ways of speaking in the same society


--used as a way to categorize and separate ppl on the basis of socioeconomic status

Age Variation

young speakers usually lead linguistic innovation


---desire to be diff from older generation

Gender Variation

language varies as a function of gender


-dependent on biological sex


-socially constructed, performative difference


--not in term of syntax

Ethnic Variation

ethnic groups usually have non-standard dialects


--powerful marker of group belonging, telling ppl outside and inside that you are part of that group


--acceptance of dominant groups dialects

Language Contact

contact of two or more languages in a society


-through media or through social contact


--most countries have significant numbers of speakers of multiple languages

Borrowing

in contact situations, common for one language to borrow from another


--most common form of borrowing is lexical borrowing, the borrowing of words


--structural is also possible but less likely


-called loan words


--languages tend to borrow words for new concepts


-loanwords adapted to the phonology of the borrowing language

Adstratal Languages

when two languages have equal prestige

Substratum Language

the language of the less dominant group

Supertratum Language

the language with the higher prestige

Outcomes of Contact

-convergence occurs when two languages take on characteristic of each other and become more similar


-language shift can occur where one language moves towards the characteristics of another (sub/sup) relationship


-language shift can result in language death


--when community abandons native language in favor of another language



Pidgin Languages

groups of ppl who speak many languages need to communicate, a pidgin is established


--have grammar and rules, however considerably simpler than full languages



Creole Languages

arise when children are born into pidgin languages


-kids nativize the language and impose a greater degree of order and structure on the language


--full fledged language may arise from pidgin

Multilingualism

society as a whole features multiple languages

Code Switching

use of two or more languages in the same utterance


--spanglish


--relies on all parties knowing all the languages


-communicative purpose, social or political, facilitate communication

Diglossia

when speakers use different languages i different social settings


-englsish at school, russian at home

Characteristics of Pidgins

have simpler phonological structure


--more restriced phonotactic constraints


--frequently lack affixes or inflectional morphmes


--morphologically simple

Characteristics of Creoles

depend on source of language and pidgin precedeing it


--tend to exhibit simple morphological systems


--no longer classifies as a simple language though


--depend more on additional words to provide grammatical info

Language Relatedness

overtime, dialects may diverge to the point that they become different languages


-results in common ancestor


-words are semantically and phonologically similar across two languages, the language may be relates

Cognates

words with similar form and meaning that come from the same source are called cognates

Sound Change and Regularity

Phonological change change affects distribution of allophones and phonemes and may result in loss of phonemes


-english didnt have /v/ only /f/


-phonological change almost always regular


--usually changes in all words in a lexicon


--eventually spreads to whole language

Analogy and Morphological Change

refers to changes in morphology of language, does not occur across the whole system


-analogy: irregular forms are made more similar to more common forms


-forms become common bc many words have them

Semantic Extension

going from the specific to general


-coke can come to mean all soft drinks

Semantic Reduction

going from general to specific


-worm used to mean bug

Internal Reconstruction

seeks to investigate the previous states of a single language

Comparative Reconstruction

seeks to compare langauges in order to infer characteristics of their common ancestor


-need cognates from related lanugages


-determine which sounds correspond to each other in languages


-determine which sound might have plausibly led to different sounds in each language

Theories of language Acquisition

Theories proposed to explain how children are able to acquire such complicated systems

Innateness Hypothesis

suggests humans are innately predisposed to acquire language

-born with structural characteristics known as universal grammar


-language acquisition relies on innate human abilities


-enough to acquire sign language as well


-


Imitation Theory

-children learn a language by memorizing words and sentences

-imitation forms at least some part of acquisition


-explains why children learn language of their enviornment


-not xplain why children make erros


-also cannot account for how chilren are able to produce and understand new utterances


Active Construction of Grammar Theories

suggest children make up their own grammatical rules


-based on patterns they observe in language environment


-analyze the rule and implement it in their own speech


- overgeneralization like goed


-ruled can be modified and fine tuned as child gets older


--grammar will approach correct adult grammar

Connectionist Theories

-suggest language is acquired by developing neural connections in the brain


-language reinforced by experiences language


-type of connections and their strengths end up reflecting statistical information about the co-occurrence of linguistic elements


-