• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/35

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

35 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Diffusion of Innovations

-this theory says that behavior change is contagious


-system of facilitating behavior change in large populations


-4 key elements : innovation, communication channels, time, the social system

Genesis of DI

-Everett Rogers at Iowa State in the 1950s was interested in Diffusion Theory


-looked at Hybrid Seed Corn

Innovation (Elements of DI)

-an idea that is perceived as new by a population


Incremental - small improvement


Distinctive - significant improvement but no new technology


Breakthrough - new technology

Relative Advantage (Characteristics of DI)

-innovation must have significant appeal for people to make a change

Compatibility (Characteristics of DI)

-high compatibility means its consistent with the person's current belief


-most important and must be perceived as meeting a critical need

Complexity (Characteristics of DI)

-issue must be applicable because any level of frustration may erode the resolve to adopt the innovation

Trailability (Characteristics of DI)

-innovations that are cheap and reversible are more likely to be adopted

Observability (Characteristics of DI)

-innovations that are observable are more likely to be adopted

Communication Channels (Elements of DI)

-the means by which messages are transferred between individuals


Mass-Media Channels

-TV, radio, newspaper


Awareness Knowledge - leads people to know the innovation exists

Interpersonal Channels

-require face-to-face interaction between two or more individuals


Subjective Evaluation - person who adopted innovation can convey an opinion about the innovation

Innovation Decision Process

Knowledge - you have to be aware of innovation and learn to use it


Persuasion - forming positive attitude to innovation


Decision - accept/reject innovation


Implementation - initial adoption of innovation


Confirmation - making commitment to innovation

Innovators

-2.5%


-able to accept risk and depart from social norms


-the spark igniting a chain of adoption

Early Adopters

-13.5%


-hold central positions within their communication structures


-can ignite a diffusion effect

Early Majority

-34%


-take longer to adopt compared to previous 2


-truly marks the successful diffusion of innovation

Late Majority

-34%


-may require a long time to adopt


-reluctant and may not have access to info sources


-typically skeptical about change


Laggards

-16%


-extremely traditional and slow to accept change


-takes a long time to adopt

Rate of Adoption

-refers to the speed an innovation is adopted


-graph of # of adopters vs time yields an S-Curve


-usually the dependent variable among DI theory studies

Homophily (Social Systems - DI)

-similarity among group members


-innovations spread fast

Social Network (Social Systems - DI)

-a person-centered web of relationships


-to hasten diffusion one should create new networks


-provide friendship, advice and support

Change Agent (Social Systems - DI)

-person who influences an adopter's decision in a favorable way


-must be used to influence the decision

Opinion Leaders (Social Systems - DI)

-people who are influential in a community and sway beliefs of colleagues either in a positive or negative direction

Limitations of DI

-people are often knowledgeable about the issue and often tried the behavior so there are no real innovations


-public health is preventative and the individual has to adopt the idea today to avoid negative consequences

Individual-Blame Bias

-tendency to hold people responsible for their problems rather than the system they are a part of


-a limitation of DI

Genesis of Freirian Model

-Paulo Freire was a Brazilian philosopher who worked in the area of adult literacy


-his book Pedagogy of the Oppressed is one of the most cited books in education in Asia, Africa, and South America

Informal Education

-based on experimental learning and uses simple conversation and can take place in any setting

Popular Education

-is need based


-doesn't have a hierarchical relationship between learners and facilitators and builds on community knowledge

3 Phases of the Freirian Model

Phase 1 (Naming and Listening Stage)


- what is the problem


Phase 2 (Reflection and Dialogue Stage)


-how do we explain this situation?


Phase 3 (Action Phase)


-what can be done to change this situation?


A Practical way to apply the Freirian Model

-what do we see?


-what is really happening?


-how does the story relate to our lives?


-why did the person acquire the problem?


-how is it possible for them to become empowered?


-what can we do about it?

Dialogue (Constructs of Freirian Model)

-two way exchange between learners and educators


-an opportunity for 2 way communication

Conscientization (Constructs of Freirian Model)

-ID of underlying systemic forces of oppression


-working together as change agents


-personalizing the issue

Praxis (Constructs of the Freirian Model)

-reflective action or active reflection


-working on a specific project


-ties "Theory to Practice"/"Practice to Theory"

Transformation (Constructs of the Freirian Model)

-relationship that identifies one as a political and social being


-discussion on political and social implications of chosen issues

Critical Consciousness (Constructs of the Freirian Model)

-political organization of those adversely affected


-politically organizing those adversely affected

Limitations

-contorted manner of writing and obscurantism make interpretation of concepts difficult and measurement very complex


-Freire's viewpoints are considered too ideal


-Freire presents a circular logic and is repetitive


-model often domesticates people


-there are no neutral words but rather challenges to the social reality