• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/25

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

25 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
History of the 4th Amendment: General Warrants
Right of the king's soldiers to search in any suspected house or premises without notice or warning. US wanted a different set up, didn't want to imitate GB
Right of the People
"The People" are USPERs but for the 4th Amendment's sake, not: prisoners, federal employees, military personnel, company e-mail, students etc.
To be secure in their persons
to include wing span: secure in their body, physical body or anything attached to or hanging from body (purse, bag, wallet, briefcase)
To be secure in their houses
physical place you own, rent, live/reside. Extends to area immediately outside of house, known as
CA v. Greenwood
Part of "secure in their houses"
4th Amendment does not prohibit warantless search/seizure of trash outside house. BUT, FBI has a higher standard and must get a warrant/supervisor approval and also can not open tax records w/o prior permission from IRS
Can we see airspace over a property w/o a warrant?
YES: Open Fields Doctrine, fair game for FBI to look at, anything beyond curtilage
To be secure in their papers
Will, academic papers, documents, mail email, physical papers
To be secure in their chattel
Whatever you own that is not your "papers" property you own, excluding a car
Against unreasonable searches and seizures, what about security?
Need for security in a public situation outweighs people's right to 4th Amendment
REASONABLE searches:
TSA, searching @ public events, school environment for safety, government buildings, DUI checkpoints, border crossings
UNREASONABLE Searches
Any search that does not fall within the "reasonable" must have a warrant, unreasonable search is rendered reasonable with a warrant
Kyllo v. United States
Permits use of thermal devices to look through walls (with a warrant)
Terry v. Ohio established what exception to "unreasonable searches"
OH policeman saw 2 men casing a store, thinks a robbery is gonna happen. Frisks them and finds a gun. SC said cop had a right/ability, if life is in danger, to pat with a hand. Must be REASONABLE SUSPICION (more than a hunch)
Exigent circumstances established what exception to "unreasonable searches"
If police see a crime being committed, they don't need a warrant: "hot pursuit" pursuing a criminal who enters a house, don't need a warrant to enter.
Consent established what exception to "unreasonable searches"
Constitution says that a spouse could give consent but FBI policy says that we can't search if the person isn't there. APPARENT AUTHORITY: a repairman or child doesn't have, only people with authority can consent and can stop at anytime. Anything found 9in consensual search can be used.
Plain view established what exception to "unreasonable searches"
No warrant is needed if something is in plain view, but the police must know it's contraband/illegal. Must identify it (can use a commercially available camera)
Motor vehicle exception
LEO doesn't need warrant if he has ARTICULABLE PROBABLE CAUSE that there is evidence of a crime inside the car
Search v. seizure
Arrest is seizure
Seizure is when something is taken
Search is when something is looked at
Consequences of 4th Amendment Violation - Exclusionary Rule
All evidence obtained without a search warrant is not admissible at trial (there is an exeption)
Exception to Exclusionary Rule: Inevitable Discover
Police would have discovered it anyway, can be used at trial. Brewer v. Williams (Church case as well): Dead body admissable under theory of inevitable discovery
"Silver Platter Doctrine"
When a federal court proceeding goes afoul b/c evidence is inadmissible bc of 4th Amendment violation, can't be used by another court system (e.g. state court)
Fruit of the Poisonous Tree
Any evidence discovered that goes beyond the scope of a warrant - have valid warrant and exceed that scope, that's inadmissable in court
What is a search warrant? 4 characteristics:
1. Signed by a neutral judge or magistrate, states with specificity the area to be searched.
2. Affidavit by LEO, sworn, utilized to secure warrant, set forth probable cause to obtain it
3. Form of inventory to what was found
4. Warrant return: goes back to the court after the warrant's been completed.
"But Upon Probable Cause supported by Oath or Affirmation"
PROBABLE CAUSE (established by ILLINOIS V. GATES): Based on the TOTALITY OF CIRCUMSTANCES, a REASONABLE PERSON would conclude that a crime has occurred, is occurring, or is about to occur.
"And particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized"
Scope of the search: warrant must have scope of only what is needed in relation to crime, can't look in a drawer for a huge TV.