Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
23 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Retrieval Cue
|
Can be info in a sensory store or STS that automatically makes contact with matching info in LTS
-Any time info is generated in STS or enters a sensory store, that info acts as a retrieval cue -It will arouse matching info in LTS which, if sufficiently aroused, will become consciously available to person |
|
Factors that Effect Retrieval Cue's Effectivenss
(1)- Match of Cue Trace |
The extent to which the info in the cue matches the info in the memory trace
--The more the info in the cue matches the info in the target trace, the more likely the retrieval will be successfull |
|
State Dependent Remembering
|
Memory is better when a person is in the same physiological state at both the time of learning and retrieval
|
|
Factors that Effect Retrieval Cue's Effectiveness
(2)- |
The number of memories in LTS that match
--The more memory traces there are in LTS that match the cue, the more difficult it will be to activate any 1 of them |
|
Cue Overload
|
Involves a retrieval cue causing forgetting by matching too much competing info in memory
Explains: Proactive Interference Retroactive Interference |
|
Factors that Effect Retrieval Cue's Effectiveness
(3)- |
The number of memories a cue has already retrieved
--The more memories a cue has already retrieved the harder it will be to retrieve additional memories (eg) Trying to retrieve name of old friend & mistakenly retrieve wrong name-Even though you know names wrong, you'll have harder time retrieving correct name BROWN- When extraneous word was related but incorrect, the %correct decreased, RT increased - (Output Interference) |
|
3 Factors Effects
Anderson & Pichert |
-passage read - some subjects told to listen from perspective of burglar
-Subjects asked to write down as much of story as remembered--Then asked to recall again but from perspective of homebuyer--Increased ability to recall info that had not been previously remembered --Remembered more info after perspective shift-- |
|
3 Factors Effects
Craik & Birtwistle |
-read & immediately free recall 5 lists of 15 words each
-Each list had words from same conceptual cateogory--Recalled fewer words on each successive list --As more lists were memorized, retrieval cue matched more & more words & became more overloaded & less effective Experimental Condition: -last list was from different conceptual category-Recall of last list rebounded to level of 1st list--Use of retrieval cue that is not overloaded |
|
3 Factors Effects
Smith |
-list of 49 words-7 words from 7 categories-Use category name to recall words from that category
-The later in the recall period a cateogy cue was provided, the fewer words they could recall -Act of recalling info from study interfered with ability to recall additional words from list--> Output Interference-3rd retrieval factor-A cue is becoming less effective the more it is used |
|
Short Term Store
|
Equivalent to Consciousness
-Anything that a person is conscious of should therefore be in the STS -Info can enter consciousness by being sufficiently activated in LTS |
|
Revised Model of Memory
|
Because of close connection between Sensory Store & LTS and LTS & STS
STS is activated subset of info in LTS -STS contains same info in LTS only an aroused form (a)Info-visual, auditory... (b)Semantic |
|
Capacity of Short Term Store
|
Serial Position Curve to measure capacity
-performance in asymptote(middle) reflects info retrieved just from LTS -Recency (last) Region represents info from both STS and LTS Capacity of STS-subtracting memory performance based on asymptote from that based on recency region = 2 items Difficulty--Negative Recency |
|
Negative Recency Effect
|
When free recall is delayed so that memory is based entirely on retrieval from LTS, memory for the last few words is unusually low
Capacity of STS = 2-3 familiar units |
|
Units for Measuring Capacity of STS
|
CHUNKS-A unified representation in memory that results when a series of individual components have become associated together
-Can be formed when we repeatedly encounter a series of stimuli in close succession |
|
Glanzer & Razel (chunks)
|
Chunks were appropriate unit for measuring STS capacity
-Presented 15 familiar proverbs-Using recency effect found that STS Capacity=2.2 proverbs |
|
2 Fates of Info in STS
|
(1)Decay-when you stop paying attention to something its activation level decays in the LTS so you stop being conscious of it
(2)Displacement-new info bumps out existing info in consciousness |
|
Evidence for Displacement
|
Glanzer
-12 word lists-free recall -Just before recall,2 or 6 distracter words were presented at 2 or 6sec rate --# of words is more important than rate of presentation--Displacement is more important then decay |
|
Selective Attention & Schizophrenia
|
Helps protect us from having contents of STS displaced by new info
-Schizophrenics are highly susceptible to displacement -Distraction had small effect on pre-recency effect-Had Detrimental Effect on Schizophrenia |
|
Duration--STS
|
Info will stay in STS until:
(a)Stop paying attention to it so its level of activation decays (b)Encounters 2 or 3 other stimuli that displace the info |
|
Short Term Memory vs. Short Term Store
|
Short Term Memory is a strategy--Use it when we're trying to keep as much info as possible in a highly available state
-Not as fixed or rigid--More Flexible |
|
Characteristics of Short Term Memory
|
Uses both short term store & long term store
-Proactive interference is LTS phenomenon so we know LTS is involved |
|
STM Rehearsal - 2 Forms
|
Start learning rehearsal at 8yrs
(1)Maintenance--Involves rote repetition-Doesn't improve persons ability to recall info the longer its rehearsed-Primarily used with STM Task (2)Elaborative--Attends to meaning of stimulus-More active and effortful than maintenance-Benefits Long Term memory |
|
STM Capacity
|
Affected by age, practice with a test, and type of test
DIGIT SPAN--7-Varies with age CAPACITY--7 + or - 2 -Any technique that allows a person to increase the size of their chunks will raise digit span |