• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/9

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

9 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Latitudinal Diversity Gradients

Species diversity increases from poles to tropics


(North to South)




(S America tropical forest every 3km^2 300 species)


30-50 in a temperate forest



Why is their high species diversity in the tropics

No recent glaciations (no disturbance allowing diversity to continue)




Stable climate (allow more to specialize in specific area leading to low extinction rates)




High productivity (warmer and wetter climates lead to more resources)




niche conservatism



High vegetative (habitat) complexity

- more and distinctive resources (fruits, insects, plants)


- more possible habitats (=close packing of species) and specialization ("own little world")


- Vertical stratification: emergents, high and low canopies, shrubs, forest floors




Niche conservatism

Organisms stay in their areas (habitats) and won't move out even if an extinction frees up another area

Trophic Structure of Tropical Forest

Habitat complexity (Large variation and amounts of distinctive resources and habitats)




Leads to


Divergence/diversification of species


(Many different types of resources that can be used and so species can live in close proximity)




Leads to


microhabitats (due to the habitat diversity)


Have narrowly defined niches (narrow range of resources to use etc)


Many species (individuals) coexisting



Contradiction of Niche Conservatism




and how does it help explain the latitudinal species diversity gradient

Birds of a Southern origin follow niche conservatism




Birds of a Northern origin don't follow niche conservatism and some move to the south




Helps explain the diversity gradient since is shows there is more migration south than north

Why does this contradiction of niche conservatism exist

Tropical birds


Take longer to mature, live longer, have fewer offspring




Therefore have a lower basal metabolic rate




not equipped physiologically to handle the lower temperatures




Can't expand ranges to colder climates (the North)

What were the results for bird migration with the Panama Land Bridge Connection formation and what were previous hypothesises

Previous Hypothesis: Birds can fly so connection didn't change anything




Recent data: Bird migration changed in a similar way to mammals




Great American Interchange


Species interchanged but in an assymetrical ratio (more North America animals flourished in S America so that half of S America's mammals have origins in the North)

Late Pleistocene Origins Model explanation for species diverging

Glaciers occurred in the Late Pleistocene


Lead to species being pushed down


Isolation and Fragmentation


Speciation occurs


Later on when species went back they are different species (eg Western and Eastern versions of similar species)

Rejection of Late Pleistocene Origins Model and reasons why

Recent glaciation caused populations to decrease or go extinct, not cause a lot of speciation (Looking at when the diversions occurred, it only resulted in subspecies)




The limited ranges/distributions of species may be caused by:


- interspecific interactions


- Dependent/Resticted to a limited range of habitat/resource


- Can not cohabitat with closely related species (too similar in life style choices)


- having limited tolerances to climate etc


- chance