Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
18 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
3 determinants for interpersonal attraction
|
1) internaldeterminants of attraction --> the need to affiliate and the basic role ofaffect -
2) external determinants of attraction --> proximity andobservable characteristics, where you stand rel to others ex physicalattractiveness- 3) interactive determinants of attraction --> similarityand mutual liking - ex ifsomeone likes you, you like them back |
|
|
projective test
|
-test implicit need to affiliate ex thematic apperception test (TAT) --> ambiguous pics, project thoughts, needs, traits and etc
|
|
|
affect
|
current mood, feelings influence info processing, intensity and direction
|
|
|
affect effects attraction
|
association, indirect effect, pos/neg affect tags that person with that feeling, beleive they are the cause
|
|
|
4 reasons laughing influences attraction
|
1) laughterhelps strengthen bonds bw
2) sharing afunny experience increase changes of pos interaction bw indiv’s - 3) distraction from discomfort on having to interact with stranger - 4) having anexperience that’s dif from normal routine |
|
|
interpersonal attractiveness
|
--> the physical closeness bw 2 ppl, where they live,where they sit in class, where they work etc
-increase interpersonal attraction with closerproximity |
|
|
propinquity effect
|
smaller physical distance are related to increase changethat 2 ppl will come into repeated contact and exposure to each other, feel posaffect and dev mutual attraction - repeated exposure is key for proximity
|
|
|
repeated exposureeffect AKA mere exposure effect
|
finding that frequent contact with any mildly neg, neutralor pos stimuli results in increase pos evaluation of that stimuli
- increaseexposure = increase liking -repeated exposure effect is stronger when ppl are NOT awarethat exposure occurred |
|
|
observable characteristic
|
influence of past experiences, stereotypes, andattributions that don’t apply to that indiv, but still used in evaluating the indiv
-ex physical attractiveness, can arouse strong affect andovercome effects of proximity |
|
|
contrast effect
|
when we see attractive person and random person, we rateperson less attractive, (control: no attractive image beforehand)
|
|
|
physicalattractiveness stereotype
|
what is beautiful, is good, pos S is related to PA, attractive ppl have attractive traits
-- but PA is NOT associated with being more honest |
|
|
courtesy stigma
|
if you’re associated with an overweight person, you might bestigmitized as well
|
|
|
similar-dissimilar effect
|
similar ppl are judged as beingsmarter, informed, moral and better adjucted than dissimilar ppl
|
|
|
matching hypoT
|
form relationships with other ppl, based on our similarityto them (pos correlation)
|
|
|
3 ways to explain similar-dissimilar effect
|
1) balance theory
2) festinger's social comparison theory 3) evolutionary perspective (adaptive values) ppl programmed to hate ppl that are dif cuz adaptive in past |
|
|
balance theory
|
the relationships among (1) an indiv’s likingfor another person, (2) his A about a topic, (3) the other person's A about topic
1) balance--> liking plus agreement, = pos emotional state, like person - 2) imbalance--> liking plus disagreement = neg state and motivation to restore balance - restorecuz you like person - 3) nonbalance --> nonliking and agreement/disagreement = indifference - don’tcare so indiff |
|
|
Festinger’s social comparison theory
|
similar others provide consesnsual validation of 1’s belief
- compareour subjective views with an objective reality |
|
|
Affect-centred modelof attraction
|
our attraction is based on pos/neg affect and can be due toindirect/direct and enhanced with cognitive processing - initial dislike of indiv is due to affect (current mood)but justification (cognitive processing) of that affect is from cognitivefactors
|
