• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/55

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

55 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
s(1)(b) LPA 1925
Lease is a proprietary estate in land
Elements of a lease
Exclusive possession
For a term certain
At a rent
Street v Mountford 1985
Laid down characteristics of a lease
Exclusive possession
Tenant excluding everyone from the land.
Exclusive possession not exclusive occupation
Exceptions to exclusive possession
Facchini v Bryson
Facchini v Bryson exceptions
No intention to create legal relationship
Act of friendship
Service occupancy
No intention to create legal relations
Cobb v Lane
Heslop v Burns
Act of friendship
Marcroft Wagons Ltd v Smith
Service occupancy
Norris v Checksfield
Abbeyfield v Woods
Daily services in elderly home. No exclusive possession just occupation
Merchant v Charters
Bachelor flat. D had daily services so no exclusive possession, only licence
AG Securities v Vaughan
Requirement to share with stranger. 4 licences.
Aslan v Murphy
Told to leave house for 90 mins each day, told had to share small room, hardly any services provided from keeping key. Sham
Certainty of term
Certainty of commencement date
Certainty of duration
Both parties aware
Say v Smith
Lease will fail without a date of commencement
Lace v Chantler
Duration of war not certain
Ashburn Anstalt v Arnold
Rendered certain although no set date to end
Both parties know the events that would bring lease to end- reconstruction
Prudential Assurance Co v London Residuary Body
Overruled Ashburn, max duration must be certain from the outset
Lace v Chantler still good law
The payment of rent
Seen as consideration for a lease
Has to be paid for tenant protection under Rent Acts
s205 LPA 1955
Whether at a rent or not
Ashburn Anstalt v Arnold
Rent not needed
Lord Templeman in Street v Mountford was not stating that you cannot have lease without rent, it just shows indication.
Colchester BC v Smith
Licence, council allowed adverse possessor to stay without rent at own risk
Skipton Building Society v Clayton
Affirms Ashburn, rent not needed
Lease of 3 years or less
s53(2) Can be informal
s54(2) Can be oral/in writing
Take effect in possession
At best rent
Bind 3rd parties as OI under Schd3 para1
Take effect in possession
Long v Tower Hamlets BC
If not= a future lease and needs deed
if 3+ months in advance needs registering
Fitzkinston LLP v Penayi
At best rent
£4,000 was a 1/3 of market rent, no lease under 54(2)
Over 3 years lease
s52(1) Needs a deed
s1(2)LP(MP)A
Clear it is a deed
Signed + attested by both parties
Delivered
7+ years lease
S52(1) Needs a deed
s1(2) LP(MP)A
Needs to be registered
s.29+30 binds 3rd parties
Binds as OI under Schd3 para 1
Legal lease 7 years or less, oral 3 years or less
Equitable lease
s53(1)(b)
s2(1) LP(MP)A 1989- Contract
in writing
containing all terms
signed by each party
Equitable lease on 3rd party
Should be registered to be protected
If not could bind as OI under Schd3 para 2 if:
Proprietary interest
In actual occupation
Except if claimant fails to disclose
Walsh v Lonsdale
'Equity looks on that as done which ought to be done'
If there is a contract under S2(1) 1989 Act it is clear what parties intended..lease will exist
Express/implied Covenants
Propriety and contractual relationship
Tenants covenants
Not to alter
Use of premises
To pay rent
No nuisance
To not reconstruct
National carriers v Panalpina
Covenant to pay rent unless lease is frustrated.
20 months no access out of 10 years did not frustrate the lease.
Covenant not to create a nuisance
Can sue for breach of quiet enjoyment of land
Landlords covenants
Covenant to repair
To renew the lease
Quiet enjoyment
Not to derogate from grant
Covenant to repair/Covenant for quiet enjoyment. Soundproofing needed due to noise outside, however tenant takes property as finds it
Southwark LBC v Mills
Perera v Vandiya 1951
Cutting off electricity breach of quiet enjoyment
Lavender v Betts
Landlord removed all windows and doors, interfered with 'uninterrupted use of property' Breach of quiet enjoyment
Complaints for breach of quiet enjoyment must be
1- Based on action by landlord
2- After commencement of lease
Covenant to repair
Generally no obligation to do so unless in lease.
Liverpool CC v Irwin
Exception to covenant to repair
Common access areas in block of flats
Barnett v Lounova
Court implied repair obligation of a dwelling house
Went against many cases
Not to derogate from grant
Landlord lets for particular purpose then actions stop that purpose from happening
Port v Griffith
L sold property next to his to someone who also opened a wool shop. No derogation from grant simply more competition
Harmer v Jumbil
Landlord let adjourning land to a new tenant who built on it, and prevented claimant to continue to store explosives
Landlord and Tenant Covenants Act 1995
Leases created on or after 1st Jan 1996
s19 Landlord and tenant Act 1927
Requirement for reasonableness for not reassigning/subletting
If person can pay rent and observe covenants then should be consented
Remedies for tenant
Repudiation by fundamental breach
damages
injunction
specific performance
action for prevention of harassment
Chartered Trust v Davis
Shopping mall lease, tenant withheld rent due to nuisance. Lease repudiated.
Remedies for landlord
Specific performance
Failure to pay rent- forfeiture
Other covenants apart from rent-
s.146 LPA 1925 notice
Non payment of rent
Forfeiture
Serve a formal demand
Tenant can be allowed time to raise money

formal demand not needed where there is an express clause in lease stating one is not needed
where more than 6 months rent in arrears

2- proceedings in court
Other covenants apart from rent
S.146 LPA Act notice served by landlord:

specifies the breach
requires it to be remedied (if it can be)
requires tenant to pay compensation
Rugby School of Governors v Tannahill
Stigma attached to property as was used for a brothel. Cannot be remedied therefore s.146 notice does not need to require remedy