Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
101 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Thorndike
|
"Animal Intelligence" monograph
cat boxes - rewards w/learning to push lever thought learning pattern for both animals/humans was trial-and-error, mechanistic |
|
Thorndike's Law of Effect
|
Responses followed by satisfaction tend to be repeated and discomfort tend not to be repeated.
|
|
Thorndike's Law of Exercise
|
A response repeated often in presence of particular stimulus will more likely be repeated in presence of that stimulus.
|
|
Thorndike's Law of Readiness
|
Organism must be ready to perform act befroe performing it could be satisfying
|
|
Transfer of training
|
specific not general
caused by similarity of concepts not intellectual faculties |
|
Thorndike's "identical elements"
|
transfer of learning increases as similarity of stimulus and response elements in training and performance environments increases
|
|
Who is considered the "father of behaviorism"
|
Watson
|
|
Watson's belief about learning
|
learning due to classical conditioning involving innate reflexes
-"radical behavioralism" |
|
Optimal time between CS and US for CR to occur?
|
.5 seconds, though optimal time depends on what behavior is being conditioned
|
|
CR is strongest and most rapidly acquired when _____ is used.
|
delayed procedure - CS before but overlaps US
|
|
CR is least likely to be acquired when ____ is used.
|
backward conditioning - US precedes CS.
|
|
"reinforcement" in classical conditioning vs. operant conditioning
|
classical - a signal reinforces an involuntary (natural) response
operant - reinforcement increases voluntary behavior |
|
spontaneous recovery
|
when an organism no longer responds to the CS but reappears later (evidence an extinguished response is not forgotton only suppressed)
|
|
stimulus generalization
|
response is elicited by similar stimulus (i.e. white rat vs. any white furry animal)
|
|
higher-order conditioning
|
Having a CS become a US for another stimulus.
Second CS is typically weaker. Pavlov could only achieve second-order, not third-order conditioning. |
|
sensory pre-conditioning
|
two CS's are paried during preconditioning sessions and both presented alone exhibit UR.
|
|
Pseudoconditioning
|
When the change in behavior is not conditioned to the stimuli, rather to the learning situation itself. (i.e. cues in entire room put together rather than loud noise elicits response)
|
|
experimental neurosis
|
a result of making difficult discriminations between stimuli
|
|
counter-conditioning
|
pairing an undesirable behavavior with an incompatible behavior to eliminate it. ex. systematic desensitization, assertiveness training, sensate focus
|
|
Author of systematic desensitization
|
Wolpe
|
|
Techniques based on classical extinction
|
flooding and implosive therapy
|
|
Flooding
|
Guthrie
a.k.a. deliberate exposure w/response prevention exposing individual to anxiety-provoking stimuli while preventing avoidance response |
|
graded exposure
|
a variation of flooding whhere the person is gradually exposed to aspects of the feared stimulus
- found as effective and instant exposure |
|
Which more effective: in-vivo flooding or imaginal flooding?
|
in-vivo
|
|
Which more effective: prolonged exposure or brief exposure?
|
prolonged
|
|
What has been found to be effective in tx of Agoraphobia and OCD?
|
in-vivo flooding or graded exposure
|
|
implosive vs. imaginal therapy
|
Stampfl
implosive involves a psychoanalytic as well as behavioral component. Imagery includes psychodynamic themes such as aggression, sexuality etc. |
|
Aversive conditioning
|
a noxious stimulus is paired with a behavior targeted for elimination so that avoidance response is elicited by targeted behavior, ex. antabuse.
**noxious stimulus is the US |
|
covert sensitization
|
aversive conditioning taking place through imagination, using unpleasant images.
-effective in paraphilias |
|
The principle underlying systematic desensitization's success?
|
exposure to feared stimulus or extinction, although developed on principles of counterconditioning
|
|
operant extinction
|
withdrawal of reinforcement from a previously reinforced behavior so that the behavior is decreased or eliminated.
|
|
response burst
|
phenomena of temporary increase in behavior that occurs when reinforcer is removed
|
|
behavioral contrast
|
when two behaviors are reinforced and one is extinguised, the second behavior increases
|
|
spontaneous recovery
|
responses increase after extinction without reinforcement (like classical conditioning)
|
|
primary vs. secondary reinforcers
|
primary - inherently valuable, i.e. food, water
secondary - allows one to acquire primary reinforcer, i.e. money |
|
generalized secondary reinforcers (generalized conditioned reinforcers)
|
A reinforcer that can allow one to acquire many different primary reinforcers, i.e. tokens or money can buy food, shelter, entertainment etc.
|
|
continuous reinforcement schedule
|
reinforcing every response
quick learning, but quick extinction |
|
Switching from continuous to intermittent reinforcement to increase resistance to extinction after behavior is learned is called what?
|
thinning
|
|
Fixed ratio vs. fixed interval schedule
|
fixed ratio - reinforcement after a fixed NUMBER of responses
fixed interval - reinforcement after fixed TIME period regardless of # of responses |
|
scallop effect
|
occurs during fixed interval schedules
|
|
Which intermittent schedule produces lowest rate of responding?
|
Fixed Interval, also lowest resistance to extinction
|
|
Variable ratio vs. variable interval
|
VR - reinforce after variable number of responses, ex. gambling.
VI - reinforcement after unpredictable amount of time, ex. pop quizzes |
|
Which intermittent schedule produces highest rate of responding?
|
Variable ratio, also highest resistance to extinction
|
|
Matching law
|
when given two+ opportunities for reinforcement, rate of each response is proportional to rate of reinforcement.
|
|
avoidance conditioning
|
Mowrer's two factor theory
combo of classical and operant conditioning, ex. claustrophobia -1)behavior is avoided through pairing of aversive stimuli w/event and 2) avoidance responses are negatively reinforced by termination of fear/anxiety when behavior is avoided |
|
Discriminative stimulus
|
environmental cue that a behavior will be reinforced
|
|
S-Delta stimulus
|
environmental cue that a behavior will not be reinforced
|
|
stimulus discrimination or stimulus control
|
when the presence of one stimulus but not another produces behavior
|
|
stimulus generalization
|
learning to respond to a similar but different stimulus
|
|
chaining
|
Explains acquisition of complex behaviors.
Each response in series acts as both a secondary reinforcer for previous response as well as discriminative stimulus for the next response in chain. |
|
response generalization
|
reinforcement increases similar responses
|
|
shaping
|
reinforcing closer and closer approximations of desired behavior
|
|
shaping vs. chaining
|
shaping's outcome is one specific, simple behavior while chaining's outcome is a series of several independent behaviors and each is important
|
|
adventitious reinforcement
|
accidental or coincidental pairing of response and reinforcement, ex. superstitious behavior.
|
|
Factors influence effectiveness of reinforcement
|
1. positive reinforcement available only after target behavior
2. Shortest interval 3. switch from continuous to intermittent 4. clarification of relationship 5. greater magnitude = greatest effectiveness (to a point then satiation occurs) |
|
Factors influence effectiveness of punishment
|
1. extreme and continual
2. sooner delievered 3. consistently applied 4. clarification of relationship and warning cue 5. reinforcing alternate behaviors 6. maximum intensity at outset (avoiding habituation, similar to tolerance) |
|
Effects of removing punishment
|
Behavior returns to baseline
At first reaches level higher than baseline |
|
Shaping often used in treating which disorder?
|
Autism, i.e. language development
|
|
Premack Principle
|
using a high probability behavior to reinforce a low probability behavior, ex. study first then watch tv
|
|
Time-out
|
secluding access to positive reinforcers
-a form of extinction -if isolation is aversive stimulus then also punishment |
|
overcorrection
|
correction of negative behavior while also repeated and exaggerated practice of appropriate behavior
|
|
response cost
|
negative punishment
removal of pre-specified reward when a behavior is performed, ex. removal of allowance |
|
Which punishment technique is most effective?
|
response cost
ex. when teaching sociopath response cost more effective then physical punishment or social disapproval |
|
DRO - differential reinforcement of other behaviors
|
operant extinction and positive reinforcement
non-reinforcement of target behavior while reinforcing all other behaviors |
|
contingency contracting
|
establishing a formal written contract that specifies target behaviors and the reinforcers/punishers contingent upon them
|
|
Factors influencing success of contingency contracts
|
1)informs both tx strategies as well as expected outcomes
2) explicit about rewards and sanctions 3) behaviors included can be monitored 4) contract elicits stmts of participation from client |
|
token economy
|
structured environment where tokens are used as reinforcers for targeted behaviors. can also include response cost
|
|
Kohler known for?
|
Gestalt psychologist
"a-ha!" experience or insight learning as a result of cognitive restructuring of environment |
|
Law of Closure
|
tendency to distort memory of a complete experience in order to experience it as finished
|
|
Zeigarnik Effect
|
tendency to remember incomplete tasks easire than complete tasks
|
|
Tolman known for?
|
latent learning and cognitive maps
|
|
latent learning
|
learning that occurs without reinforcement and does not immediately manifest itself in performance/behavior
|
|
Social learning theory
|
modeling, or the tendency to imitate others, accounts for most complex forms of learning
|
|
Bandura's research on modeling shows what?
|
1)high status models more likely imitated than low status
2)imitation more likely when perceived as similar to model 3)graded participant modeling > simple modeling/watching |
|
Harlow known for?
|
nature of task can be rewarding enough, intrinsic reward.
Also, "learning how to learn" or learning set/strategy |
|
Hull known for?
|
Drive reduction theory
|
|
Drive Reduction Theory
|
Learning is motivated by desires to reduce a drive (hunger, aggression, sex). ex. hungry rat runs father to food than satiated one
|
|
Miller and Dollard known for?
|
Research on learning aggressive behavior.
Approach-Avoidance Conflict |
|
Approach-Avoidance Conflict
|
Miller and Dollard theory
avoidance gradient is stronger than approach gradient (will run faster to avoid shock than to get food). |
|
imprinting
|
the very rapid attachment toward first moving object seen during "sensitive period" of development
-highly genetically organized |
|
Yerkes-Dodson Law
|
1) optimal performance = higher level arousal needed simple tasks, lower for complex task
2) Inverted U relationship, regardless of task difficulty |
|
Behavioral assessment steps
|
ABC model or functional analysis
Antecedents Behaviors Consequences |
|
Ebbinghaus known for?
|
first major studies of memory, using self as subject
|
|
multi-store model of memory
|
3 levels
1) sensory memory (2-3 sec) 2) short-term memory/primary memory(holding tank - 5-9 pieces of info) 3) long-term memory/secondary memory - unlimited capacity |
|
Primary memory
|
Short term memory (1st step to storage)
|
|
Secondary memory
|
long term memory (2nd step to storage)
|
|
chunking
|
grouping large amounts of info into smaller related units - increases amt of info that can be retained in STM
|
|
Name the components of long term memory
|
1) implicit or procedural - skills/conditioned responses, how to DO things
2) explicit or declarative - memory able to report or declare (not just do unconsciously as in implicit) Types of explicit/declarative memory: Semantic - language knowledge Episodic - event knowledge |
|
Serial position effect
|
when given a list of words, recall words frm beginning and end of list best
|
|
flashbulb memory
|
vivid, detailed memories of emotionally-charged events
-more accurate when of personal significance -fade over time |
|
anterograde amnesia
|
recall info prior to trauma but cannot retain any newly learned info
|
|
retrograde amnesia
|
failure to remember events prior to a particular trauma
|
|
Amnesia: neurologically impaired vs. others
|
neurologically impaired who have retrograde typically ALSO have anterograde amnesia.
Pseudodementia/psychogenic amnesics typicallly have retrograde but NOT anterograde |
|
Schema theory of memory
|
Memory tend to be filtered through schemas and may be biased to fit
|
|
method of loci
|
associating items with visual image
|
|
Eidetic imagery means what?
|
photographic memory
More common in children than adults |
|
What is most effective learning strategy for simple tasks?
|
Overlearning
|
|
What is best way to retain new information?
|
sleep following learning of new information (limits intereference)
|
|
% of sex abuse victims who later recalled abuse and factors distinguishing them?
|
Loftus, 19%
No factors found to distinguish those who repressed and those who remembered |
|
feature integration theory
|
focused visual attention allows us to perceive an object as a whole vs. meaningless features
|
|
Name Thorndike's 3 principal laws
|
effect, exercise, readiness
|