Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
17 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Contingency theory description
|
-leader/match theory
-match leaders to appropriate situations -effectiveness depends on how well the leader's style fits the context -Fiedler's generalizations about which styles of leadership are best and worst are based on empirically grounded generalizations |
|
definition
|
-match leader's style to the right setting
-assessment based on a. leadership styles b. situational variables |
|
leadership styles
|
-task motivated (low LPC's): concerned with reaching goal
-relationship motivated (High LPC's): concerned with developing close interpersonal relationship |
|
leader style measurement scale (Fiedler)
|
least preferred co-worker (LPC) scale
high LPC's=relationship motivated low LPC's=task motivated |
|
situational variables : 3 factors
|
a. leader member relations
b. task structure c. position power |
|
leader member relations
|
-refers to the group atmosphere and the degree of confidence, loyalty, and attraction of followers for leader
-group atmosphere: good: high degree of sub. trust, liking, positive relationship bad: little or no trust, friction exists, unfriendly |
|
task structure
|
-concerns the degree to which requirements of a task are clear and spelled out
-high structure: a. rules/requirements are clearly stated and known b. path to accomplish has few alternatives c. task completion can be clearly demonstrated d. correct solutions exist |
|
task structure cont'd
|
-low structure:
a. rules/requirements are unclear/not stated b. path to accomplish has many alternatives c. task completion cannot be demonstrated/verified d. unlimited number of correct solutions exiest |
|
position power
|
-designates the amount of authority a lead has to reward or punish followers
-strong power: can hire, fire, give raises in rank or pay -weak power: no authority to hire, fire, or give raises |
|
situational variables : 3 factors
|
-determine the favorableness of various situations in organizations
-situations that are rated a. most favorable: good leader-follower relations, defined tasks, and strong leader position power b. least favorable: poor leader-follower relations, unstructured tasks, and weak leader position power c. moderately favorable: fall in between extremes |
|
reasons for leader mismatch ineffectiveness
|
-LPC style doesn't match situation which creates stress and anxiety
-under stress, leaders revert to less mature coping style learned in early development -leader's less mature coping style results in poor decision making and consequently negative work outcomes |
|
how contingency theory works
|
-by assessing the 3 situational variables, any organizational context can be placed in one of the 8 categories represented in the Contingency theory model
-after the nature of a situation is determined, the leader's style can be matched -overall scope: by measuring leader's LPC score and the 3 variables, it's possible to predict whether a leader will be effective |
|
how it works
|
-low LPC's (task)=1,2,3,and 8
-high LPC's (relationship)=4,5,6,and 7 -mid LPC's=1,2, and 3 -if style matches situation, leader will be effective and vice versa |
|
strengths
|
-empirical support: tested and found valid and reliable in explaining how to achieve effective leadership
-broadened understanding: broadened scope of leadership -predictive: provides info regarding type of leadership that will most likely be effective in particular contexts |
|
strengths
|
-not an all-or-nothing approach: leaders should not expect to be effective in every situation
-leadership profiles |
|
criticisms
|
-fails to explain why leaders with certain styles are more effective in some situations than others
-criticism of LPC scale validity, does not correlate well with other measurement tools -cumbersome to use in real world -doesn't explain what should be done with a leader/situation mismatch |
|
application
|
-answers many questions about leadership of individuals in various org.
-helpful in assisting upper management in making changes to lower level positions |