• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/17

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

17 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Contingency theory description
-leader/match theory
-match leaders to appropriate situations
-effectiveness depends on how well the leader's style fits the context
-Fiedler's generalizations about which styles of leadership are best and worst are based on empirically grounded generalizations
definition
-match leader's style to the right setting
-assessment based on
a. leadership styles
b. situational variables
leadership styles
-task motivated (low LPC's): concerned with reaching goal
-relationship motivated (High LPC's): concerned with developing close interpersonal relationship
leader style measurement scale (Fiedler)
least preferred co-worker (LPC) scale
high LPC's=relationship motivated
low LPC's=task motivated
situational variables : 3 factors
a. leader member relations
b. task structure
c. position power
leader member relations
-refers to the group atmosphere and the degree of confidence, loyalty, and attraction of followers for leader
-group atmosphere:
good: high degree of sub. trust, liking, positive relationship
bad: little or no trust, friction exists, unfriendly
task structure
-concerns the degree to which requirements of a task are clear and spelled out
-high structure:
a. rules/requirements are clearly stated and known
b. path to accomplish has few alternatives
c. task completion can be clearly demonstrated
d. correct solutions exist
task structure cont'd
-low structure:
a. rules/requirements are unclear/not stated
b. path to accomplish has many alternatives
c. task completion cannot be demonstrated/verified
d. unlimited number of correct solutions exiest
position power
-designates the amount of authority a lead has to reward or punish followers
-strong power: can hire, fire, give raises in rank or pay
-weak power: no authority to hire, fire, or give raises
situational variables : 3 factors
-determine the favorableness of various situations in organizations
-situations that are rated
a. most favorable: good leader-follower relations, defined tasks, and strong leader position power
b. least favorable: poor leader-follower relations, unstructured tasks, and weak leader position power
c. moderately favorable: fall in between extremes
reasons for leader mismatch ineffectiveness
-LPC style doesn't match situation which creates stress and anxiety
-under stress, leaders revert to less mature coping style learned in early development
-leader's less mature coping style results in poor decision making and consequently negative work outcomes
how contingency theory works
-by assessing the 3 situational variables, any organizational context can be placed in one of the 8 categories represented in the Contingency theory model
-after the nature of a situation is determined, the leader's style can be matched
-overall scope: by measuring leader's LPC score and the 3 variables, it's possible to predict whether a leader will be effective
how it works
-low LPC's (task)=1,2,3,and 8
-high LPC's (relationship)=4,5,6,and 7
-mid LPC's=1,2, and 3
-if style matches situation, leader will be effective and vice versa
strengths
-empirical support: tested and found valid and reliable in explaining how to achieve effective leadership
-broadened understanding: broadened scope of leadership
-predictive: provides info regarding type of leadership that will most likely be effective in particular contexts
strengths
-not an all-or-nothing approach: leaders should not expect to be effective in every situation
-leadership profiles
criticisms
-fails to explain why leaders with certain styles are more effective in some situations than others
-criticism of LPC scale validity, does not correlate well with other measurement tools
-cumbersome to use in real world
-doesn't explain what should be done with a leader/situation mismatch
application
-answers many questions about leadership of individuals in various org.
-helpful in assisting upper management in making changes to lower level positions